Advertisement

Agency at Work pp 141-159 | Cite as

Proactive Employees: The Relationship Between Work-Related Reflection and Innovative Work Behaviour

  • Gerhard MessmannEmail author
  • Regina H. Mulder
Chapter
Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL, volume 20)

Abstract

This chapter addresses the role of work-related reflection as a facilitator of innovative work behaviour. We approached this issue by carrying out a synthesis of findings from one qualitative and three quantitative studies involving samples of vocational education teachers, secondary education teachers, and employees of a production company. In accordance with our synthesis, we suggest that workrelated reflection, including innovation-specific reflection and reflection during daily work, is a powerful driver for proactive behaviours including innovative work behaviour and, thus, for organisational and professional development.

Keywords

Innovative work behaviour Work-related reflection Professional development Organisational development Proactive employees 

References

  1. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. doi: 10.1177/0149206314527128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baartman, L. K. J., & De Bruijn, E. (2011). Integrating knowledge, skills and attitudes: Conceptualising learning processes towards vocational competence. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boud, D. (2006). Creating the space for reflection at work. In D. Boud, P. Cressey, & P. Docherty (Eds.), Productive reflection at work: Learning for changing organizations (pp. 158–169). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H., Niesen, W., & Van Hootegem, G. (2014). On the relation of job insecurity, job autonomy, innovative work behaviour and the mediating effect of work engagement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(3), 318–330. doi: 10.1111/caim.12079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorenbosch, L., Van Engen, M. L., & Verhagen, M. (2005). On-the-job innovation: The impact of job design and human resource management through production ownership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 129–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8691.2005.00333.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellström, P.-E. (1997). The many meanings of occupational competence and qualification. Journal of European Industrial Training, 21(6/7), 266–273. doi: 10.1108/03090599710171567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felstead, A., Fuller, A., Unwin, L., Ashton, D., Butler, P., & Lee, T. (2005). Surveying the scene: Learning metaphors, survey design and the workplace context. Journal of Education and Work, 18(4), 359–383. doi: 10.1080/13639080500327857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harteis, C., & Goller, M. (2014). New skills for new jobs: Work agency as a necessary condition for successful lifelong learning. In S. Billett, T. Halttunen, & M. Koivisto (Eds.), Promoting, assessing, recognizing and certifying lifelong learning: International perspectives and practices (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hetzner, S., Heid, H., & Gruber, H. (2012). Change at work and professional learning: How readiness to change, self-determination and personal initiative affect individual learning through reflection. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 539–555. doi: 10.1007/s10212-011-0094-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hetzner, S., Heid, H., & Gruber, H. (2015). Using workplace changes as learning opportunities. Antecedents to reflection in professional work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(1), 34–50. doi: 10.1108/JWL_12-2013-0108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Høyrup, S. (2004). Reflection as a core process in organisational learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 442–454. doi: 10.1108/13665620410566414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. doi: 10.1348/096317900167038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. A. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129–145. doi: 10.1002/job.242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169–211.Google Scholar
  18. Kauffeld, S., Grote, S., & Henschel, A. (2007). Das Kompetenz-Reflexions-Inventar (KRI) [The competence-reflection inventory]. In J. Erpenbeck & L. v. Rosenstiel (Eds.), Handbuch Kompetenzmessung (2nd ed., pp. 337–347). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  19. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy. American Psychologist, 52(1), 57–66. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leicher, V., & Mulder, R. H. (2016). Team learning, team performance and safe team climate in elder care nursing. Team Performance Management, 22(7/8), 399–214. doi: 10.1108/TPM-04-2016-0017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present, and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marinova, D., & Phillimore, J. (2003). Models of innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 44–53). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marianne van Woerkom, (2016) The Concept of Critical Reflection and Its Implications for Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources 6 (2):178-192Google Scholar
  25. Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2011). Innovative work behaviour in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed. Vocations and Learning, 4(1), 63–84. doi: 10.1007/s12186-010-9049-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2012). Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Human Resource Development International, 15(1), 43–59. doi: 10.1080/13678868.2011.646894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2014). Exploring the role of target specificity in the facilitation of vocational teachers’ innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 80–101. doi: 10.1111/joop.12035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2015a). Reflection as a facilitator of teachers’ innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(2), 125–137. doi: 10.1111/ijtd.12052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2015b). Conditions for apprentices’ learning activities at work. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 67(4), 578–596. doi: 10.1080/13636820.2015.1094745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Messmann, G., Mulder, R. H., & Gruber, H. (2010). Relations between vocational teachers’ characteristics of professionalism and their innovative work behaviour. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
  31. Mulder, R. H. (2013). Exploring feedback incidents, their characteristics and the informal learning activities that emanate from them. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(1), 49–71. doi: 10.1108/03090591311293284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. doi: 10.1177/0149206308321554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raemdonck, I., Gijbels, D., & Van Groen, W. (2014). The influence of job characteristics and self-directed learning orientation on workplace learning. International Journal of Training and Development, 18(3), 188–203. doi: 10.1111/ijtd.12028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. doi: 10.2307/256701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Woerkom, M. (2004). The concept of critical reflection and its implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6, 178–192. doi: 10.1177/1523422304263328.
  37. West, M. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Product development teams (Vol. 5, pp. 1–29). Stamford: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  38. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4(1), 15–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Educational ScienceUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations