Advertisement

Nipple-Areola Complex Replantation After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction

  • Raphael Wirth
  • Andrej Banic
  • Dominique Erni
Chapter

Abstract

Traditionally, the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is resected during mastectomy. The NAC determinates aesthetic outcome after breast reconstruction, and a natural-looking NAC can barely be reconstructed with other tissues. The aim was to assess the oncological safety as well as morbidity and aesthetic outcome after replantation of the NAC. Retrospective analysis of 85 patients receiving 88 mastectomies and IBR was conducted. NAC (n = 29) or the nipple alone (n = 23) was replanted 7 days (median, range 2–10 days) after IBR in 49 patients. Malignant involvement of the subareolar tissue was found in eight cases (9.1%). In 69% and 26% of the cases, total or partial necrosis occurred if the entire NAC or only the nipple were replanted, respectively (P <0.01). Depigmentation was seen in 52%, and corrective surgery was done in 11 out of 52 NAC or nipple replantations. Local recurrence and isolated regional lymph node metastasis were observed in one single case each. It can be concluded that the replantation of the NAC in IBR is oncologically safe. However, the long-term aesthetic outcome of NAC replantation is not satisfying, which advocates replanting the nipple alone.

References

  1. 1.
    McCormick B, Wrigth J, Cordiero P. Breast reconstruction combined with radiation therapy: long-term risks and factors related to decision making. Cancer J. 2008;14:264–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hudson DA, Skoll PJ. Single-stage, autologous breast restoration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1163–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Sclafani L, Buchanan C, Fey JV, Disa JJ, Mehrara BJ, Cordeiro PG. Breast cancer recurrence following prosthetic, postmastectomy reconstruction: incidence, detection, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:381–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlson GW, Styblo TM, Lyles RH, Bostwick J, Murray DR, Staley CA, Wood WC. Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:108–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, Ames FC, Wang BG, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL. Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing mastectomy and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:421–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simmons RM, Fish SK, Gayle L, La Trenta GS, Swistel A, Christos P, Osborne MP. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:676–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:1048–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andersen JA, Gram JB, Pallesen RM. Involvement of the nipple and areola in breast cancer. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;15:39–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perry RG, Cochran TC, Wolfort FG. When is there nipple involvement in carcinoma of the breast? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59:535–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Menon RS, van Geel AN. Cancer of the breast with nipple involvement. Br J Cancer. 1989;59:81–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ziswiler-Gietz J, Makrodimou M, Harder Y, Banic A, Erni D. Outcome analysis of breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008;138:114–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areolar reconstructions: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:457–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, Peters S, Shestak A, Kim J. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:780–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hudson DA, Dent DM, Lazarus D. One-stage immediate breast and nipple-areolar reconstruction with autologous tissue I: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg. 2000;45:471–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, King V, Osborne M. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:165–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb G, Singletary SE. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:609–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Banerjee A, Gupta S, Bhattacharya N. Preservation of the nipple-areola complex in breast cancer – a clinicopathological assessment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1195–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, Lambasa S, Petrovecki M, Stanec Z. Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:240–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, Kroll SS, Ames FC, Ross MI, Feig BW, Singletary SE. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:620–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Greenway RM, Schlossberg L, Dooley WC. Fifteen-year series of skin-sparing mastectomy for stage 0 to 2 breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;190:933–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meretoja TJ, von Smitten KAJ, Leidenius MH, Svarvar C, Heikkilä PS, Jahkola TA. Local recurrence of stage 1 and 2 breast cancer after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in a 15-years series. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:1142–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, Müller H, Küchenmeister I, Makovitzky J, Kundt G, Friese K. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncological safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hikino H, Kodama K, Yasui K, Ozaki N, Nagaoka S, Miura H. Intracystic adenomyoepithelioma of the breast—case report and review. Breast Cancer. 2007;14:429–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Patani N, Mokbel K. Oncological and aesthetic considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:391–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WIRTH Plastische ChirurgieBiel-BienneSwitzerland
  2. 2.BANIC Plastische ChirurgieBernSwitzerland
  3. 3.Plastische Chirurgie ErniKüssnacht am RigiSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations