The Nipple-Areolar Complex: A Pictorial Review of Common and Uncommon Conditions

  • Kyu Soon KimEmail author


The nipple-areolar complex is evaluated as a separate region of the breast, and optimal clinical and diagnostic techniques are needed for best evaluation of the region because of the complicated anatomy and superficial location. In this chapter, we will discuss various diseases of nipple-areolar complex lesions, including Montgomery tubercles, nipple inversion, benign calcifications, inflammation, duct dilatations, intraductal papilloma, fibroadenomas, neurofibromatosis, dermatoses of the nipple, and breast malignancy. A comprehensive understanding of the anatomic variant and benign and malignant processes and the imaging features of each lesion are essential for accurate differentiation and diagnosis.


  1. 1.
    Kopans DB. Anatomy, histology, physiology, and pathology. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 3–27.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nicholson BT, Harvey JA, Cohen MA. Nipple-areolar complex: normal anatomy and benign and malignant processes. Radiographics. 2009;29(2):509–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Da Costa D, Taddese A, Cure ML, Gerson D, Poppiti R Jr, Esserman LE. Common and unusual diseases of the nipple-areolar complex. Radiographics. 2007;27(Suppl 1):S65–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kopans DB. Breast anatomy and basic histology, physiology, and pathology. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 7–43.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalbhen CL, Kezdi-Rogus PC, Dowling MP, Flisak ME. Mammography in the evaluation of nipple inversion. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(1):117–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kopans DB. Interpreting the mammogram. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 365–479.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim HS, Cha ES, Kim HH, Yoo JY. Spectrum of sonographic findings in superficial breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(5):663–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kopans DB. Breast ultrasound. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 555–605.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huynh PT, Parellada JA, de Paredes ES, Harvey J, Smith D, Holley L, Maxin M. Dilated duct pattern at mammography. Radiology. 1997;204(1):137–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cilotti A, Bagnolesi P, Napoli V, Lencioni R, Bartolozzi C. Solitary intraductal papilloma of the breast. An echographic study of 12 cases. Radiol Med. 1991;82(5):617–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ganesan S, Karthik G, Joshi M, Damodaran V. Ultrasound spectrum in intraductal papillary neoplasms of breast. Br J Radiol. 2006;79(946):843–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boonjunwetwat D, Prathombutr A. Imaging of benign papillary neoplasm of the breast: mammographic, galactographic and sonographic findings. J Med Assoc Thail. 2000;83(8):832–8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurtz AB, Goldberg BB. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonomammography correlated with pathology in 122 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140(2):369–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harper AP, Kelly-Fry E, Noe JS, Bies JR, Jackson VP. Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses. Radiology. 1983;146(3):731–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jackson VP, Rothschild PA, Kreipke DL, Mail JT, Holden RW. The spectrum of sonographic findings of fibroadenoma of the breast. Investig Radiol. 1986;21(1):34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Sloane JP. Benign processes-tumors. In: Tohno E, editor. Ultrasound diagnosis of breast diseases. 1st ed. Edinburgh; New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 76–91.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonographic appearance. Radiology. 1989;172(3):671–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adler DD. Ultrasound of benign breast conditions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1989;10(2):106–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Rubin CM, Butcher C, Royle GT, Theaker J. Ultrasonic attenuation in fibroadenoma of the breast. Clin Radiol. 1992;45(3):175–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murat A, Kansiz F, Kabakus N, Kazez A, Ozercan R. Neurofibroma of the breast in a boy with neurofibromatosis type 1. Clin Imaging. 2004;28(6):415–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gokalp G, Hakyemez B, Kizilkaya E, Haholu A. Myxoidneurofibromas of the breast: mammographical, sonographical and MRI appearances. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(958):e234–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reynolds DL Jr, Jacobson JA, Inampudi P, et al. Sonographic characteristics of peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(3):741–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lin J, Martel W. Cross-sectional imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: characteristic signs on CT, MR imaging, and sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(1):75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cordoliani F, Rybojad M, Verola O, Espié M. Dermatoses of the nipple and the areola. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol. 1995;43(1–2):82–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parlakgumus A, Yildirim S, Bolat FA, Caliskan K, Ezer A, Colakoglu T, Moray G. Dermatoses of the nipple. Can J Surg. 2009;52(2):160–1.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Iancu D, Nochomovitz LE. Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: presentation as a mass in the female nipple. Breast J. 2001;7(4):263–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Amamo G, Yajima M, Moroboshi Y, Kuriya Y, Ohuchi N. MRI accurately depicts underlying DCIS in a patient with Paget’s disease of the breast without palpable mass and mammography findings. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35:149–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lloyd J, Flanagan AM. Mammary and extramammary Paget’s disease. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:742–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Capobianco G, Spaliviero B, Dessole S, Cherchi PL, Marras V, Ambrosini G, Meloni F, Meloni GB. Paget’s disease of the nipple diagnosed by MRI. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274:316–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyEulji University HospitalDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations