Advertisement

Three-Dimensional Nipple-Areola Tattooing

  • Joseph A. Ricci
  • Eric G. Halvorson
Chapter

Abstract

The technique of three-dimensional (3D) nipple-areola complex (NAC) tattooing is a significant advance in obtaining improved esthetic results for women undergoing breast reconstruction. The application of 3D techniques or “realism” in tattoo artistry has significant potential to improve the esthetic outcomes of reconstructive surgery. Traditional coloring techniques for NAC tattooing ignore the artistic principles of light and shadow to create depth on a two-dimensional surface. The method presented in this article is essentially the inverse of traditional technique and results in a more realistic and 3D reconstruction that can appear better than surgical methods. When combined with surgical nipple reconstruction in appropriate patients, excellent results can be achieved. Overall, plastic surgeons have just begun to explore the possible applications of medical tattoos in plastic surgery that may allow us to enhance the esthetic results of not only breast reconstruction but other areas alike.

References

  1. 1.
    Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:232–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winocour S, Saksena A, Oh C, Wu PS, Laungani A, Baltzer H, Saint-Cyr M. A systematic review of comparison of autologous, allogeneic, and synthetic augmentation grafts in nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:14e–23e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhong T, Antony A, Cordeiro P. Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:591–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richter DF, Reichenberger MA, Faymonville C. Comparison of the nipple projection after reconstruction with three different methods. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2004;36:374–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boccola MA, Savage J, Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Milner C, Rahdon R, Whitaker IS. Surgical correction and reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex: current review of techniques. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010;26:589–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:457–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halvorson EG, Cormican M, West ME, Myers V. Three-dimensional nipple-areola tattooing: a new technique with superior results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1073–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spear SL, Arias J. Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35:232–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Myers V. Vinnie Myers Tattoos. Available at: www.vinniemyers.com. Accessed 15 June 2016.
  11. 11.
    Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:239–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Project PI. 3D nipple areolar tattooing. www.pinkinkproject.com. Accessed 12 June 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations