Advertisement

Nipple-Areolar Complex Ischemia: Management During Aesthetic Mammoplasties

  • Alberto Rancati
  • Claudio Angrigiani
  • Marcelo Irigo
  • Braulio Peralta
Chapter

Abstract

Partial or total nipple necrosis after aesthetic mammoplasty surgery can occur. Continuous nipple-areolar complex (NAC) checking and early identification of vascular compromise, followed by appropriate action, may help prevent total NAC loss. The authors describe the vascular anatomy of the breast, associated risk factors, preoperative information, vitality of the NAC during closure, NAC ischemia, intraoperative NAC perfusion evaluation, intraoperative NAC reperfusion and maneuvers, free NAC graft indications, when should a NAC free graft be considered, complications of free nipple grafting, postoperative care, wound care for NAC necrosis, protocol for sequelae treatment, can we predict NAC viability, and ICG intraoperative procedure.

References

  1. 1.
    Grotting JC, Neligan PC. Plastic surgery. In: Breast, vol. 5. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012. p. 247.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manahan MA, Buretta KJ, Chang D, Mithani SK, Mallalieu J, Shermak MA. An outcomes analysis of 2142 breast reduction procedures. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(3):289–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stolier AJ, Levine EA. Reducing the risk of nipple necrosis: technical observations in 340 nipple-sparing mastectomies. Breast J. 2013;19:173–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hofmann AK, Wuestner-Hofmann MC, Bassetto F, Scarpa C, Mazzoleni F. Breast reduction: modified “Lejour technique” in 500 large breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1095–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spear SL, Rottman SJ, Seiboth LA, Hannan CM. Breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:572–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Deventer PV, Page BJ, Graewe FR. The safety of pedicles in breast reduction and mastopexy procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2008;32:307–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Woods JE, Meland NB. Conservative management in full-thickness nipple-areolar necrosis after subcutaneous mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:258–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mojallal A, Comparin JP, Voulliaume D, Chichery A, Papalia I, Foyatier JL. Reduction mammaplasty using superior pedicle in macromastia. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005;50(2):118–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lugo LM, Prada M, Kohanzadeh S, Mesa JM, Long JN, de la Torre J. Surgical outcomes of gigantomastia breast reduction superomedial pedicle technique: a 12-year retrospective study. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(5):533–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Landau AG, Hudson DA. Choosing the superomedial pedicle for reduction mammaplasty in gigantomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:735–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hester TR Jr, Bostwick J 3rd, Miller L, Cunningham SJ. Breast reduction utilizing the maximally vascularized central breast pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:890–900.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wray RC, Luce EA. Treatment of impending nipple necrosis following reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;68:242–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masia J, Larranaga J, Clavero JA, Vives L, Pons G, Pons JM. The value of the multidetector row computed tomography for the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: our experience in 162 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60:29–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roth AC, Zook EG, Brown R, Zamboni WA. Nipple-areolar perfusion and reduction mammaplasty: correlation of laser Doppler readings with surgical complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:381–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cunningham L. The anatomy of the arteries and veins of the breast. J Surg Oncol. 1977;9(1):71–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Findlay EH. Ischemia of the nipple, areola, and skin flaps. In: Fisher J, Handel N, editors. Problems in breast surgery: a repair manual. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014. p. 493–5.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wueringer E, Tschabitscher M. New aspects of the topographical anatomy of the mammary gland regarding its neurovascular supply along a regular ligamentous suspension. Eur J Morphol. 2002;40:181–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hallock GG, Cusenz BJ. Salvage of the congested nipple during reduction mammoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg. 1986;10:143–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seamon MJ, Wobb J, Gaughan JP, Kulp H, Kamel I, Dempsey DT. The effects of intraoperative hypothermia on surgical site infection: an analysis of 524 trauma laparotomies. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):789–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’Dey DM, Prescher A, Pallua N. Vascular reliability of nipple-areola complex-bearing pedicles: an anatomical microdissection study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:292–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nahabedian MY, Mofid MM. Viability and sensation of the nipple-areolar complex after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49:24–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hammond DC, O’Connor EA, Knoll GM. The short-scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction technique in severe mammary hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:34–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lypka M, Rizvi M, Lapuerta L. The Graf/Biggs flap to increase upper pole projection in breast reductions with free nipple grafts. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2010;34:687–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steed DL. Debridement. Am J Surg. 2004;187(5A):71S–4S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang P, Nuveen EJ. Diagnosis and management of areolar ischemia. Am J Cosmet Surg. 2012;29(2):159–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ramundo J, Gray M. Collagenase for enzymatic debridement: a systematic review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009;36(6 Suppl):S4–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Knig M, Vanscheidt W, Augustin M, Kapp H. Enzymatic versus autolytic debridement of chronic leg ulcers: a prospective randomised trial. J Wound Care. 2005;14:320–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Colakoglu S, Khansa I, Curtis MS, Yueh JH, Ogunleye A, Haewyon C, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1428–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hallock GG. Salvage by tattooing of areolar complications following breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91:942–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nahai FR, Nahai F. Breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(1 Suppl):1–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wuringer E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J. Nerve and vessel sup plying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:1486–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Rancati
    • 1
  • Claudio Angrigiani
    • 2
  • Marcelo Irigo
    • 3
  • Braulio Peralta
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Oncoplastic Surgery, Instituto Oncologico Henry MooreUniversity of Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Department of Plastic SurgeryHospital SantojanniBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Department of Oculoplastic Surgery, Instituto Oncologico Henry MooreUniversity of Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.Instituto Oncologico Henry MooreUniversity of Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations