Towards Modeling of Finger Motions in Virtual Reality Environment

  • Sven NõmmEmail author
  • Aaro Toomela
  • Jaroslav Kulikov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10324)


Virtual reality environment with incomplete immersion is used in this paper, as a tool to alter environment, or to be more precise to alter perception of the environment, such that learning of some primitive fine motor activities would be required. Fine motor exercises and tests are not new in neurology and psychology. Nevertheless, their digitalization appeared to be a challenging task and up to now did not become widely accepted by practicing specialists. The present research has three distinctive novel components. First, is the way to use virtual reality environment. Namely absence of 3D glasses, changes of the objects properties and absence of the haptic feedback are used to persuade one to learn. Second, the methodology used to analyze motions and positions of fingers. In addition to commonly used methods, set of parameters describing motion during certain time interval is proposed. Third is the types of tests and exercises used to perform the studies. Within the present studies simple tasks of repositioning virtual cubes are used. Achieved results clearly demonstrate that proposed environment requires one to learn simple motor actions and proposed technique is able to distinguish motions in different stages of training.


Fine motor functions Learning process Modeling 


  1. 1.
    Caro, K., Beltrán, J., Martínez-García, A.I., Soto-Mendoza, V.: ExerCaveRoom: a technological room for supporting gross and fine motor coordination of children with developmental disorders. In: Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, PervasiveHealth 2016, pp. 313–317. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), Brussels (2016).
  2. 2.
    Drotar, P., Mekyska, J., Rektorova, I., Masarova, L., Smekal, Z., Faundez-Zanuy, M.: Evaluation of handwriting kinematics and pressure for differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Artif. Intell. Med. 67, 39–46 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lu, W., Tong, Z., Chu, J.: Dynamic hand gesture recognition with leap motion controller. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 23(9), 1188–1192 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lupu, R.G., Botezatu, N., Ungureanu, F., Ignat, D., Moldoveanu, A.: Virtual reality based stroke recovery for upper limbs using leap motion. In: 2016 20th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), pp. 295–299, October 2016Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luria, A.R.: Higher Cortical Functions in Man. Springer, New York (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marquardt, C., Mai, N.: A computational procedure for movement analysis in handwriting. J. Neurosci. Methods 52(1), 39–45 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nomm, S., Bardos, K., Masarov, I., Kozhenkina, J., Toomela, A., Toomsoo, T.: Recognition and analysis of the contours drawn during the Poppelreuter’s test. In: 2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), pp. 170–175, December 2016Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nomm, S., Toomela, A., Borushko, J.: Alternative approach to model changes of human motor functions. In: 2013 European Modelling Symposium (EMS), pp. 169–174, November 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nomm, S., Toomela, A., Kozhenkina, J., Toomsoo, T.: Quantitative analysis in the digital Luria’s alternating series tests. In: 2016 14th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), pp. 1–6, November 2016Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nõmm, S., Toomela, A.: An alternative approach to measure quantity and smoothness of the human limb motions. Est. J. Eng. 19(4), 298–308 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nomm, S., Toomela, A., Vaske, M., Uvarov, D., Taba, P.: An alternative approach to distinguish movements of Parkinson disease patients. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(19), 272–276 (2016). (In: 13th IFAC Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems HMS 2016, Kyoto, Japan, 30 August–2 September 2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tammik, V., Toomela, A.: Relationships between visual figure discrimination, verbal abilities, and gender. Perception 42(9), 971–984 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weichert, F., Bachmann, D., Rudak, B., Fisseler, D.: Analysis of the accuracy and robustness of the leap motion controller. Sensors 13(5), 6380–6393 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Software ScienceTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia
  2. 2.School of Natural Sciences and HealthTallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations