Abstract
To improve a robot’s performance at a given task, or to respond to changing requirements, shape adaptation can be beneficial. To efficiently explore complex behaviors, diverse morphologies must be generated and implemented. For continuous and autonomous design optimization, the robot has furthermore to be able to assess its own performance and in turn generate and implement adapted morphological designs. Here, we present the morphological adaptation of physical robotic agents to a locomotion task. The robots are automatically assembled by a robotic manipulator from elementary modules and the assembly process of each agent is encoded in a genotype. The genotypes of a robot population are optimized using an evolutionary algorithm based on real-world performance feedback. In the experiments, 500 genotypes were evaluated. To develop rich behavioral diversity, shape variations are beneficial. Analysis of the results highlights the influence of the fabrication constraints on shape diversity, which impose limitations especially for larger structures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Brodbeck, L., Iida, F.: An extendible reconfigurable robot based on hot melt adhesives. Auton. Robots 39(1), 87–100 (2015). doi:10.1007/s10514-015-9428-1
Brodbeck, L., Hauser, S., Iida, F.: Morphological evolution of physical robots through model-free phenotype development. PLoS ONE 10(6), e0128,444 (2015). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128444
Kuehn, T., Rieffel, J.: Automatically designing and printing 3-D objects with EvoFab 0.2. Artif. Life 13, 372–378 (2012). doi:10.7551/978-0-262-31050-5-ch049
Kurokawa, H., Tomita, K., Kamimura, A., Kokaji, S., Hasuo, T., Murata, S.: Distributed self-reconfiguration of M-TRAN III modular robotic system. Int. J. Robot. Res. 27(3–4), 373–386 (2008). doi:10.1177/0278364907085560
Lichtensteiger, L., Eggenberger, P.: Evolving the morphology of a compound eye on a robot. In: Third European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots, pp. 127–134 (1999). doi:10.1109/EURBOT.1999.827631
Neubert, J., Lipson, H.: Soldercubes: a self-soldering self-reconfiguring modular robot system. Auton. Robots (2015). doi:10.1007/s10514-015-9441-4
Nurzaman, S.G., Culha, U., Brodbeck, L., Wang, L., Iida, F.: Active sensing system with in situ adjustable sensor morphology. PLoS ONE 8(12), e84,090 (2013). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084090
Peet, R.K.: The measurement of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5, 285–307 (1974)
Peng, Z., Genewein, T., Braun, D.A.: Assessing randomness and complexity in human motion trajectories through analysis of symbolic sequences. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8(168) (2014). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00168
Pfeifer, R., Lungarella, M., Iida, F.: Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science 318(5853), 1088–1093 (2007). doi:10.1126/science.1145803
Revzen, S., Bhoite, M., Macasieb, A., Yim, M.: Structure synthesis on-the-fly in a modular robot. pp. 4797–4802 (2011). doi:10.1109/IROS.2011.6094575
Sproewitz, A., Moeckel, R., Vespignani, M., Bonardi, S., Ijspeert, A.: Roombots: a hardware perspective on 3D self-reconfiguration and locomotion with a homogeneous modular robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 62(7), 1016–1033 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.robot.2013.08.011
Wang, L., Iida, F.: Physical connection and disconnection control based on hot melt adhesives. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 18(4), 1397–1409 (2013). doi:10.1109/TMECH.2012.2202558
Wang, L., Brodbeck, L., Iida, F.: Mechanics and energetics in tool manufacture and use: a synthetic approach. J. R. Soc. Interface 11(100) (2014). doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0827
Weel, B., Crosato, E., Heinerman, J., Haasdijk, E., Eiben, A.: A robotic ecosystem with evolvable minds and bodies. pp. 165–172 (2014). doi:10.1109/ICES.2014.7008736
Yim, M., Shen, W.M., Salemi, B., Rus, D., Moll, M., Lipson, H., Klavins, E., Chirikjian, G.: Modular self-reconfigurable robot systems [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14(1), 43–52 (2007). doi:10.1109/MRA.2007.339623
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brodbeck, L., Hauser, S., Iida, F. (2018). Robotic Invention: Challenges and Perspectives for Model-Free Design Optimization of Dynamic Locomotion Robots. In: Bicchi, A., Burgard, W. (eds) Robotics Research. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60916-4_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60916-4_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60915-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60916-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)