Advertisement

Representation of World War II in Vietnam, China, and the USA: Political Ideologies in Secondary History Textbooks

Chapter
Part of the Intercultural Studies in Education book series (ISE)

Abstract

The study explored how ideologies are embedded in the secondary school history textbooks of three countries: the USA, China, and Vietnam, through the narratives of World War II. The study employed a combined qualitative method of ideological discourse analysis and narrative discourse analysis and gathered data from three textbook samples of the three countries. Findings illustrated that each country’s textbook sample was densely embedded with political ideologies, namely, democracy, socialism, and Marxism-Leninism. At the same time, three countries shared similar attempts to promote exceptionalism and nationalism through the textbooks they produced. The study concluded with implications for the teaching of world history in a global context.

Keywords

History textbook World history Political ideologies World War II 

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (1991). Textbooks: The international dimension. In M. W. Apple & L. K. Christian-Smith (Eds.), The politics of the textbook (pp. 242–258). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Apple, M. W. (1992). The text and cultural politics. Educational Researcher, 21(7), 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  4. Apple, M. W., & Christian-Smith, L. K. (1991). The politics of the textbook. In M. W. Apple & L. K. Christian-Smith (Eds.), The politics of the textbook (pp. 1–21). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, C. (2000). Cultural studies: Theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, R. B., Black, L., Krieger, L. S., Naylor, P. C., & Shabaka, D. I. (2012). Modern world history: Patterns of interaction. Orlando: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Bonus point policy for post-secondary exams. (2015). Higher-Ed recruitment information. Retrieved from http://www.thongtintuyensinh.vn/Cong-diem-uu-tien-va-diem-khuyen-khich-khi-xet-tot-nghiep-THPT_C272_D12044.htm
  8. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, N., & Da’Na, S. (2007). The Palestinian national authority: The politics of writing and interpreting curricula. In E. A. Doumato & G. Starrett (Eds.), Teaching Islam: Textbooks and religion in the Middle East (pp. 125–152). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. China’s Ministry of Education. (2006). Compulsory education law of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_2803/200907/49979.html
  11. Dimitriadis, G., Weis, L., & McCarthy, C. (2006). Introduction. In L. Weis, C. McCarthy, & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Ideology, curriculum, and the new sociology of education: Revisiting the work of Michael Apple (pp. 2–13). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Education Law of the People’s Republic of China of 1995, 45 Chinese Code. §§1-84. (2006).Google Scholar
  13. Faden, L. Y. (2015). Globalisation and history education: The United States and Canada. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Nation-building and history education in a global culture (pp. 51–65). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Foster, S., & Nicholls, J. (2005). America in World War II: An analysis of history textbooks from England, Japan, Sweden, and the United States. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 20(3), 214–233.Google Scholar
  15. Geertz, C. (2000). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Perseus Books Group. (Original work published 1973).Google Scholar
  16. Ginsburg, M. B., & Lindsay, B. (1995). Conceptualizing the political dimension in teacher education. In M. B. Ginsburg & B. Lindsay (Eds.), The political dimension in teacher education: Comparative perspectives on policy formation, socialization, and society (pp. 3–20). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gutek, G. L. (2014). Philosophical, ideological, and theoretical perspectives on education. London: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Hagai, S., Kitamura, Y., Ratha, K. V., & Brehm, W. C. (2017). Ideologies inside textbooks: Vietnamization and Re-Khmerization of political education in Cambodia during the 1980s. In M. J. Bellino & J. H. Williams (Eds.), (Re) constructing memory: Education, identity, and conflict (pp. 49–73). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Han, C. (2007). History education and ‘Asian’ values for an ‘Asian’ democracy: The case of Singapore. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(3), 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardwick, S. W., Marcus, R., & Isaak, M. (2010). Education and national identity in a comparative context. National Identities, 12(3), 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsiao, H. M. (2011). One colonialism, two memories: Representing Japanese colonialism in Taiwan and South Korea. In G. Shin & D. C. Sneider (Eds.), History textbooks and the wars in Asia: Divided memories (pp. 173–190). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. International Monetary Fund. (2016). World economic outlook database [Data base]. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/
  23. Janmaat, J., & Vickers, E. (2007). Education and identity formation in post-communist Europe and East Asia: Introduction. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(3), 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones, A. (2011). Toward pluralism?: The politics of history textbooks in South Korea, Taiwan, and China. In G. Shin & D. C. Sneider (Eds.), History textbooks and the wars in Asia: Divided memories (pp. 208–229). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Knain, E. (2001). Ideologies in school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LaSpina, J. A. (2003). Designing diversity: Globalisation, textbooks, and the stories of nations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(6), 667–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levesque, S. (2009). Thinking historically: Educating students for the 21st century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  28. Marino, M. P. (2011). High school world history textbooks: An analysis of content focus and chronological approaches. The History Teacher, 44(3), 421–446.Google Scholar
  29. Mitter, R. (2013). Forgotten Ally: China’s World War II, 1937–1945. London: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  30. Nicholls, J. (2006). Beyond the national and the transnational: Perspectives of WWII in U.S.A., Italian, Swedish, Japanese, and English school history textbooks. In S. J. Foster & K. A. Crawford (Eds.), What shall we tell the children? International perspectives on school history textbooks (pp. 89–112). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Ornstein, A. C. (1994). The textbook-driven curriculum. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(3), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Orr, J. J. (2001). The victim as hero: Ideologies of peace and national identity in postwar Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  33. Phillips, R. (1998). History teaching nationhood and the state: A study in educational politics. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  34. Pingel, F. (2006). Reform or conform: German reunification and its consequences for history schoolbooks and curricula. In J. Nicholls (Ed.), School history textbooks across cultures: International debates and perspectives (pp. 61–82). Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  35. Qun, G., & Wanjin, M. (2007). China’s new national curriculum reform: Innovation, challenges and strategies. Frontiers of Education in China, 2(4), 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shin, G. W., & Sneider, D. C. (2011). History textbooks and the wars in Asia: Divided memories. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Network for Education Information. (2008). Structure of U.S. education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/edlite-structure-us.html
  38. Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffner & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language and Peace. Amsterdam: Harwood.Google Scholar
  39. Vickers, E. (2006). Defining the boundaries of “Chineseness”: Tibet, Mongolia, Taiwan, and Hong Kong in mainland history textbooks. In S. J. Foster & K. Crawford (Eds.), What shall we tell the children?: International perspectives on school history textbooks (pp. 25–48). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Vietnam’s Ministry of Education. (1998). Education law. Retrieved from http://vbpl.vn/TW/Pages/vbpqen-toanvan.aspx?ItemID=1275&Keyword=education+law
  41. Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Zajda, J. (2015). Globalisation and the politics of education reforms: History education. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Nation-building and history education in a global culture (pp. 1–14). London: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chau Vu
    • 1
  1. 1.Louisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations