Performance Evaluation of Proposed Secured Minimum Delay Routing Protocol (SMDRP) in Vehicular Adhoc Network

  • V. Viswacheda Duduku
  • Ali Chekima
  • Jamal Ahmed Dargham
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 614)


In the present day research of vehicular Adhoc networks, the design of an efficient routing protocol providing high speed communications is a technical challenge for researchers in this area of study. A protocol that is secured, stable and reliable is an important aspect for the vehicular as hoc networks. The present day existing routing protocols designed for vehicular communications are not providing the required quality of service in VANETS and still research is going on for providing the full-fledged support for intra and inter vehicular communications. In our research we proposed a protocol called as Secured Minimum Delay Routing Protocol (SMDRP) by utilizing the clustering technique and location information using GPS. For the network performance we evaluated the different network parameters with protocols such as GPSR, CAGFP and GRUV using NS3 a network analyzing simulator. The simulation results show that SMDRP showed cost effective in terms of packet delivery ratio, throughput and end to end delay.




  1. 1.
    Dua, A., Kumar, N., Bawa, S.: A systematic review on routing protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc networks. Veh. Commun. 1(1), 33–52 (2014). Elsevier Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Singh, S., Kumari, P., Agrawal, S.: Comparative analysis of various routing protocols in VANET. In: ACCT 2015 Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies (ACCT), pp. 315–319 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biswas, S., Misic, J.: A cross-layer approach to Privacy-preserving authentication in WAVE-enabled VANETs. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 62(5), 2182–2192 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Memon, S., Kazi, H., Channa, M.I., Shaikh, M.A.: Performance evalution of manet’s reactive and proactive routing protocols in high speed vanet. Int. J. Mod. Commun. Technol. Res. (IJMCTR) 2(12), 20–25 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chowdhury, S.I., Lee, W.-I., Choi, Y.-S., Kee, G.-Y., Pyun, J.-Y.: Performance evaluation of reactive routing protocols in VANET. In: 17th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), Sutera Harbour Resort, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia, 2nd–5th October 2011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chai, R., Yang, B., Li, L., Sun, X., Chen, Q.: Clustering-based data transmission algorithms for VANET. In: 2013 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), pp. 1–6 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karp, B., Kung, H.T.: GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In: Proceedings of Sixth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, Boston, pp. 243–254 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zeadally, S., et al.: Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETS): status, results, and challenges. Telecommun. Syst. 50(4), 217–241 (2012). Zarza, H., Karimi, H., Mohammad, S., Hosseini, S.Y., Ataeian, H.R., Rostami, H.: CAGFP: context aware geocast forwarding protocol for inter-vehicle communicationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, G., Chen, W., Xu, Z., Liang, H., Mu, D., Gao, L.: Geocast routing in urban vehicular ad hoc networks. Comput. Inf. Sci. 208, 23–31 (2009). Studies in Computational Intelligence. SpringerGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Viswacheda Duduku
    • 1
  • Ali Chekima
    • 1
  • Jamal Ahmed Dargham
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Engineering Program, FKJUniversiti Malaysia SabahKota KinabaluMalaysia

Personalised recommendations