Misreading the Conservation Landscape

  • Kent H. Redford
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability book series (PSAS)


The social sciences are often seen as being in opposition to conservation and the practise of conservationists. Yet, social scientists have made important contributions to conservation and could make even more if they are willing to use perceptive, insightful tools as a means of both improving the practise of conservation and sharpening social science’s critique of conservation ideas and practises. This chapter provides two profiles: (1) the ways in which this author thinks social science work has already improved conservation practise and (2) a set of generalisations made by some social scientists about the practise of conservation that are incorrect or incomplete. I argue that a more careful application of social science tools and approaches could begin an active and informed exploration of the diversity of values, histories, institutions, politics and approaches in conservation. This would facilitate the sharpening of social science’s critique of conservation ideas and practises and, through these, improve the practise of conservation.



I would like to thank my social science friends and colleagues who have taught me so much but are not responsible for what I have learned: Bill Adams, Allyn Stearman, Katrina Brandon, Arun Agrawal, Bill Balee, Peter Brosius, Marcus Colchester, Steve Sanderson, Anna Tsing and Paige West. For perceptive and often critical, but always useful comments, I would like to thank Arun Agrawal, Nigel Dudley, Mike Mascia, Dan Miller, John Robinson, Steve Sanderson and Meredith Welch Devine. I also would like to thank the constructive engagement of three reviewers.


  1. Agrawal, A., and C.C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and Disen Chantment: The Role of Covmmunity in Natural Resource Conservation. World Development 27: 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brosius, J.P. 2006. Common Ground Between Anthropology and Conservation Biology. Conservation Biology 20: 683–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chape, S., M. Spalding, and M. Jenkins, eds. 2008. The World’s Protected Areas: Status, Values and Prospects in the 21st Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dudley, N., ed. 2008. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  5. Dudley, N., J.D. Parrish, K.H. Redford, and S. Stolton. 2010. The Revised IUCN Protected Area Management Categories: The Debate and Ways Forward. Oryx 44: 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fairhead, J., and M. Leach. 1996. Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harorn, H.G., Y.D. Bradle, C. Pohl, R. Stephan, and U. Wiesmann. 2006. Implications of Transdisciplinarity for Sustainability Research. Ecological Economics 60: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenkins, C.N., and L. Joppa. 2009. Expansion of the Global Terrestrial Protected Area System. Biological Conservation 142: 2166–2174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mascia, M.B., J.P. Brosius, T.A. Dobson, B.C. Forbes, L. Horowitz, M.A. Mckean, and N.J. Turner. 2003. Conservation and the Social Sciences. Conservation Biology 17: 649–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mcclanahan, T.R., J.E. Cinner, N.A.J. Grham, T.M. Daw, J. Maina, S.M. Stead, et al. 2009. Identifying Reefs of Hope and Hopeful Actions: Contextualizing Environmental, Ecological, and Social Parameters to Respond Effectively to Climate Change. Conservation Biology 23: 662–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 2017. Frequently asked questions about Italian protected areas. Accessed 3 July 2017.
  12. Peterson, R.B., D. Russll, P. West, and J.P. Brosius. 2008. Seeing (and Doing) Conservation Through Cultural Lenses. Environmental Management 45: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reyers, B., D.J. Roux, R.M. Cowling, A.E. Ginburg, J.L. Nel, and P. O’Farrell. 2010. Conservation Planning as a Transdisciplinary Process. Conservation Biology 24: 957–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kent H. Redford
    • 1
  1. 1.Archipelago ConsultingPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations