Introduction: Rethinking the Boundaries of Conservation NGOs
As debates rage on about changes required to build a different future for the planet, the role of conservation nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) as the global watchdogs of sustainability is increasingly prominent, but also questioned, in the public sphere. Vigorous debates about the role and effects of conservation NGOs call for independent analysis and examination of contemporary challenges and solutions. This book aims to showcase and challenge some of the latest engagements between critical social science and conservation NGOs. The authors have sought to do this partly because they believe it to be fundamentally important. Through such engagements it is possible to learn more about the consequences and politics of conservation policy, the way in which organisations function, and the interactions between various epistemologies and epistemic communities. This is a productive and insightful area for both researchers and practitioners. The chapters that constitute this book showcase and debate some of the approaches that demonstrate these insights.
- Bateson, G. 1973. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution and Epistemology. London/Toronto: Paladin Granada Publishing.Google Scholar
- Chapin, M. 2004. A Challenge to Conservationists. World Watch Magazine, November/December 2004.Google Scholar
- Colchester, M. 2003. Salvaging Nature: Indigenous Peoples, Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation. Montevideo: World Rainforest Movement and Forest Peoples Programme.Google Scholar
- Ferraro, P.J., and S.K. Pattanayak. 2006. Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments. PLoS Biol 4 (4): e105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105.
- Kraft, M.E. 2001. Influence of American NGOs on Environmental Decisions and Policies: Evolution over Three Decades. In The Role of Environmental NGOs: Russian Challenges, American Lessons: Proceedings of a Workshop, 145–160. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. 2016. Anthropologists’ Encounters with NGOs: Critique, Collaboration, and Conflict. In Cultures of Doing Good: Anthropologists and NGOs, ed. A. Lashaw, C. Vannier, and S. Sampson. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
- MacDonald, K. 2003. IUCN: A History of Constraint. Text of an Address Given to the Permanent Workshop of the Centre for Philosophy of Law Higher Institute for Philosophy of the Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), Louvain-la-neuve.Google Scholar
- Matulis, B.S., and J.R. Moyer. 2016. Beyond Inclusive Conservation: The Value of Pluralism, the Need for Agonism, and the Case for Social Instrumentalism. Conservation Letters: n/a-n/a.Google Scholar
- Pyhälä, A., et al. 2016. Protected Areas in the Congo Basin: Failing Both People and Biodiversity? London: Rainforest Foundation UK.Google Scholar
- Ruysschaert D. 2013. Le rôle des organisations de conservation dans la construction et la mise en oeuvre de l’agenda international de conservation d’espèces emblématiques: le cas des orangs-outans de Sumatra. PhD Thesis, University of Toulouse. Available through: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00951940
- Winer, N., et al. 2007. Conservation, Protected Areas and Humanitarian Practice. Policy Matters 15: 232–240.Google Scholar