Advertisement

Success and Multiculturalism in Finnish Schools

  • Heidi Layne
  • Fred Dervin
  • Rita Johnson Longfor
Chapter

Abstract

Layne et al. problematize the dreams and opportunities that immigrant students in Finland are offered for their future careers. The authors focus on the perceptions and roles of school staff (teachers, study counselors, principals and school psychologists) in these matters by applying Ahmed’s organizational antiracism theory. They also adopt a critical race theory methodology and a reflexive constructivist approach. Their empirical data consists of interviews and observation notes relating to elementary, lower secondary and upper secondary school staff. In order to provide counter-narratives, the authors use Finnish newspaper articles published on the success of immigrants and voices from two teachers with an immigrant background. Layne et al.’s aim was to increase understandings in Finland of the structures supporting the academic and social success of immigrant children and young people in education.

Keywords

Finnish education School staff Critical race theory Immigrant children Multicultural dialogues 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2006). Doing diversity work in higher education in Australia. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(6), 745–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alemanji, A. A. (2016). Is there such a thing…?: A study of antiracism education in Finland. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Andreotti, V., & Pashby, K. (2013). Digital democracy and global citizenship education: Mutually compatible or mutually complicit? The Educational Forum, i First.  10.1080/00131725.2013.822043
  5. Breidenback, J., & Nyiri, P. (2009). Seeing culture everywhere: From genocide to consumer habits. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom. A pedagogy for learning and teaching? Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dervin, F. (2012). La meilleure éducation au monde? Contre-enquête sur la Finlande. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  8. Dervin, F. (2015). Towards post-intercultural teacher education: Analysing ‘extreme’ intercultural dialogue to reconstruct interculturality. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dervin, F., Paatela-Nieminen, M., Kuoppala, K., & Riitaoja, A.-L. (2012). Multicultural education in Finland – Renewed intercultural competences to the rescue? International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(3), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcia, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harju-Luukkainen, H., Nissinen, K., Sulkunen, S., Suni, M., & Vettenranta, J. (2014). Avaimet osaamiseen ja tulevaisuuteen. Selvitys maahanmuuttajataustaisten nuorten osaamisesta ja siihen liittyvistä taustatekijöistä PISA 2012-tutkimuksessa. Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos, Jyväskylän yliopisto.Google Scholar
  13. Helsingin Sanomat. (2015a, June 24). Ulkomaalaistaustaisia tyttöjä ohjataan lähihoitajaksi, vaikka rahkeet riittäisivät lääkäriksi. HS: Kaupunki. http://www.hs.fi/kaupunki/a1434855331878
  14. Helsingin Sanomat. (2015b, August). Maahanmuuttajaoppilaiden koulumenestys kantaväestöä heikompaa. HS: Kotimaa. http://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/a1439862511831
  15. Holiday, A. (2010). Intercultural communication. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. ICEF Monitor. (2016). Finland introduces university tuition fees for non-EU students. http://monitor.icef.com/2016/01/finland-introduces-university-tuition-fees-for-non-eu-students/
  17. Itkonen, T., Talib, M., & Dervin, F. (2015). ‘Not all of us Finns communicate the same way either’: Teachers’ perceptions of interculturality in upper secondary vocational education and training. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 67(3), 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kilpi-Jakonen, E. (2012). Does Finnish educational equality extend to children of immigrants? Examining national origin, gender and the relative importance of parental resources. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2(2), 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumpulainen, T. (Ed.). (2014). Koulutuksen tilastollinen vuosikirja. Koulutuksen seurantaraportit. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.Google Scholar
  20. Kvale, S. (1996). An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  21. Layne, H. (2016). Contact zones in (Finnish) intercultural education. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston opettajankoulutuslaitos, Tutkimuksia. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/165072.Google Scholar
  22. Layne, H., & Lipponen, L. (2016). Student teachers in the contact zone: Developing critical intercultural “teacherhood” in kindergarten teacher education. Globalisation, Societies and Education Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14(1), 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leonardo, Z. (2009). Race, whiteness, and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. López, L. M., & Tápanes, V. (2011). Latino children attending a two-way immersion program in the United States: A comparative case analysis. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(2), 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. NCBE. (2014). National core curriculum for basic education in Finland. Porvoo: Finnish National Board of Education.Google Scholar
  26. NCBE. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education in Finland. Porvoo: Finnish National Board of Education.Google Scholar
  27. Paatela-Nieminen, M., & Itkonen, I. (2016). Reading the world as texts: Intertextuality in theory and practice for (art) education. In T. Itkonen & F. Dervin (Eds.), Silent partners in multicultural education (pp. 3–27). Charlotte, NC: Info Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Phillips, A. (2007). Multiculturalism without culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Puwar, N. (2004). Space invaders: Race, gender and bodies out of place. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  30. Race, R. (2015). Multiculturalism and education. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  31. Riitaoja, A.-L. (2013). Toiseuksien rakentuminen koulussa. Tutkimus opetussuunnitelmista ja kahden helsinkiläisen koulun arjesta [Constructing otherness in school: A study of curriculum texts and everyday life of two primary schools in Helsinki]. PhD dissertation, Helsingin yliopisto, Tutkimuksia 346.Google Scholar
  32. Sahlberg, P., & Hargreaves, A. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schatz, M., Dervin, F., & Popovic, A. (2015). From PISA to national branding: Exploring Finnish education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education.  10.1080/01596306.2015.1066311
  34. Solorzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). A Critical race counterstory of race, racism, and affirmative action. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Souto, A.-M. (2011). Arkipäivän rasismi koulussa. Etnografinen tutkimus suomalais-ja maahanmuttajanuorten ryhmäsuhteista. [Everyday racism in school. An ethno- graphic study of group relations between Finnish and immigrant youths] Nuorisotutkimusseura, julkaisuja 110: Helsinki.Google Scholar
  36. Tuori, S. (2009). The politics of multicultural encounters: Feminist postcolonial perspectives. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Viiki Teacher Training School. (n.d.). Website. http://www.vink.helsinki.fi/index.php?del=0&d=911

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heidi Layne
    • 1
  • Fred Dervin
    • 1
  • Rita Johnson Longfor
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations