An Integrative Literature Review: What Are the Barriers that Stop Organisations from Learning the Lessons Highlighted in Serious Incident Investigations?
It has been suggested that we have moved into an adaptive age of safety and that one of the key accident prevention strategies in this age is that of ‘organisational learning’. Effective safety management in this age requires organisations to investigate and learn from (major/serious) incidents. This paper aims to outline some of the most significant barriers to organisational learning following major events, through an integrative review, by reviewing the current literature around incident reporting. This review identified five key themes in the published literature, and a gap between knowledge and actual practice in industry. As a community of safety professionals there is much we can do to close this gap, through empirical studies aimed to further understanding and break down some of these learning barriers.
KeywordsIncident investigation Accident investigation Organisational learning Integrative review
- 1.Akselsson, R., Jacobsson, A., Borjesson, M., Ek, A., Enander, A.: Efficient and effective learning for safety from incidents. Work 41, 3216–3222 (2012)Google Scholar
- 2.Borys, D., Else, D., Leggett, S.: The fifth age of safety: the adaptive age. J. Health Saf. Res. Pract. 1(1), 19–27 (2009)Google Scholar
- 4.Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP): 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. Public Health Resource Unit, Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
- 13.Pillay, M., Borys, D., Else, D., Tuck, M.: Safety culture and resilience engineering: theory and application in improving gold mining safety. In: Dominy, S. (ed.) Gravity Gold 2010, 129–140. AusIMM, Melbourne (2010)Google Scholar
- 14.Pillay, M., Jefferies, M.C.: A revised framework for managing construction health and safety risks based on ISO31000. In: Behm, M., Ciaran, M. (eds.) Proceedings COBW099: Benefitting Workers and Society Through Inherently Safe(r) Construction, pp. 467–477, CIB (2015)Google Scholar