HomeAssist: An Assisted Living Platform for Aging in Place Based on an Interdisciplinary Approach

  • Charles Consel
  • Lucile Dupuy
  • Hélène Sauzéon
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 590)


This paper presents HomeAssist: an assisted living platform aims to support aging in place. This platform was designed using a human-centered approach. It offers assistive services, addressing the main aspects of daily life: activities of daily living, home and user safety, and social participation. HomeAssist introduces key novel features: (1) it covers multiple aspects of daily life, addressing a variety of needs of older adults; (2) it provides customization mechanisms, adapting assistance to the user’s abilities while preventing autonomy losses; (3) it relies on context awareness, delivering timely assistance; and, (4) it revolves around a unified user interface to achieve usability.

All these features play a key role towards achieving high acceptance of HomeAssist and supporting autonomy effectively, as shown by our field study.


Human Factors Aging in place Pervasive computing Field study 


  1. 1.
    Rashidi, P., Mihailidis, A.: A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 17(3), 579–590 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czaja, S.J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A., Sharit, J.: Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychol. Aging 21(2), 333–352 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, K., Chan, A.: A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology 10(1), 1–12 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, K., Chan, A.H.S.: Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics 57(5), 635–652 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peek, S.T.M., Wouters, E.J.M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K.G., Boeije, H.R., Vrijhoef, H.J.M.: Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 83(4), 235–248 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J.: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Queirós, A., Silva, A., Alvarelhão, J., Rocha, N.P., Teixeira, A.: Usability, accessibility and ambient-assisted living: a systematic literature review. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 14(1), 57–66 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reeder, B., Meyer, E., Lazar, A., Chaudhuri, S., Thompson, H.J., Demiris, G.: Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 82(7), 565–579 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morrow, D.G., Rogers, W.A.: Environmental support: an integrative framework. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 50(4), 589–613 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aguilova, L., Sauzéon, H., Balland, E., Consel, C., N’Kaoua, B.: Grille AGGIR et aide à la spécification des besoins des personnes âgées en perte d’autonomie. Rev. Neurol. 170(3), 216–221 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dupuy, L., Sauzéon, H., Consel, C.: Perceived needs for assistive technologies in older adults and their caregivers. In: ACM WomENcourage 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caroux, L., Consel, C., Dupuy, L., Sauzéon, H.: Verification of daily activities of older adults: a simple, non-intrusive, low-cost approach. In: ACM ASSETS 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bouisson, J.: Routinization preferences, anxiety, and depression in an elderly french sample. J. Aging Stud. 16(3), 295–302 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Consel, C., Dupuy, L., Sauzéon, H.: A unifying notification system to scale up assistive services. In: ACM ASSETS 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Mensch and Computer, pp. 187–196. Vieweg + Teubner Verlag (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dupuy, L., Consel, C., Sauzéon, H.: Self determination-based design to achieve acceptance of assisted living technologies for older adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 508–521 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wehmeyer, M.L.: Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Res. Pract. Persons Severe Disabil. 30(3), 113–120 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., McHugh, P.R.: Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12(3), 189–198 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lawton, M., Brody, E.: Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9, 179–186 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fried, L.P., Tangen, C.M., Walston, J., Newman, A.B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., Seeman, T., Tracy, R., Kop, W.J., Burke, G., et al.: Frailty in older adults evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 56(3), M146–M157 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ekelund, C., Eklund, K.: Longitudinal effects on self-determination in the RCT “Continuum of care for frail elderly people”. Qual. Ageing Older Adults 16(3), 165–176 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dupuy, L., Froger, C., Consel, C., Sauzéon, H.: Evaluation of everyday functioning benefits from a long-term use of an assisted living platform for aging in place: a pilot field study amongst frail community-dwelling older adults and their caregivers (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Consel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lucile Dupuy
    • 2
  • Hélène Sauzéon
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Bordeaux Institute of TechnologyTalenceFrance
  2. 2.InriaTalenceFrance
  3. 3.University of BordeauxTalenceFrance

Personalised recommendations