AHFE 2017: Advances in Communication of Design pp 13-23 | Cite as
Directing Untrained Users’ Attention Using Simple Sound Patterns
Abstract
In this work, we show how simple sound patterns can be used to direct a person’s attention towards specific locations, when the sound is emitted from a single, fixed position. In interaction design, this is an effect most often achieved using visual ques, such as animations or flashing lights. Using sound instead is useful in situations where visual ques are undesirable or unfeasible. We designed two experiments with a total of n = 45 respondents. 10 different sound patterns were composed with inspiration from previous studies and used as stimuli. The results showed significant differences (p = 0.05) for directing the gaze upwards and downwards and trends for left-right. The composed sounds require no prior training, or knowledge of cultural references (contrary to e.g. earcons and auditory icons) by the respondents and can thus be regarded as universal in nature.
Keywords
Human factors Interaction design Auditory displays Sound design Directing attentionNotes
Acknowledgements
We received financial support for this work from Aalborg University and Innovation Fund Denmark, through the Danish Infinit network. Musician Keld Bauman composed and rendered the D-sounds for us. Bang and Olufsen A/S provided the loudspeakers and amplifiers used in the experiment. Finally, we thank all our respondents for lending us their ears and time.
References
- 1.Pratt, C.C.: The Spatial Character of High and Low Tones. Journal of Experimental Psychol. 13, 278–285 (1930)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Blauert, B.: Spatial Hearing – The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1997). Revised editionGoogle Scholar
- 3.Roffler, S.K., Butler, R.A.: Factors that influence the localization of sound in the vertical plane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43(6), 1255–1259 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Mudd, S.A.: Spatial stereotypes of four dimensions of pure tone. J. Exp. Psychol. 66(4), 347–352 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Simon, J.R., Mewaldt, S.P., Acosta Jr., E., Hu, J.-M.: Processing auditory information of two population stereotypes. J. Appl. Psychol. 61(3), 354–358 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Walker, B.N., Ehrenstein, A.: Pitch and pitch change interact in auditory displays. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 6(1), 15–30 (2000)Google Scholar
- 7.Walker, R.: The effects of culture, environment, age, and musical training on choices of visual metaphors for sound. Percept. Psychophys. 42(5), 491–502 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Gaver, W.W.: Auditory icons: using sound in computer interfaces. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, 167–177 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Gaver, W.W.: The SonicFinder, an interface that uses auditory icons. Hum. Comput. Interact. 4, 67–94 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Blattner, M., Sumikawa, D., Greenberg, R.: Earcons and icons: their structure and common design principles. Hum.-Comput. Interaction 4(1), 11–44 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Brewster, S.A., Wright, P.C., Edwards, A.D.N.: A detailed investigation into the effectiveness of earcons. In: Kramer, G. (ed.) Auditory Display, pp. 471–498. Addison-Wesley, New York (1994)Google Scholar
- 12.Gaver, W.W.: Auditory Interfaces. Handbook of human-computer interaction (1997)Google Scholar