The Effect of See-Through Truck on Driver Monitoring Patterns and Responses to Critical Events in Truck Platooning

  • Bo Zhang
  • Ellen S. Wilschut
  • Dehlia M. C. Willemsen
  • Tom Alkim
  • Marieke H. Martens
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 597)

Abstract

Automated platooning of trucks has its beneficial effects on energy saving and traffic flow efficiency. The vehicles in a platoon, however, need to maintain an extremely short headway to achieve these goals, which will result in a heavily blocked front view for the driver in a following truck. Monitoring surrounding traffic environment and foreseeing upcoming hazardous situations becomes a difficult, yet safety-critical task. This exploratory study aims to investigate whether providing platoon drivers with additional visual information of the traffic environment can influence their monitoring pattern and increase awareness of the upcoming situation. 22 professional truck drivers participated in the driving simulator experiment, either following a see-through lead truck (i.e., with projection of forward scene attached to the rear of the lead truck), or a normal lead truck until the automation system failed unexpectedly in a critical situation. Results showed that when provided with front view projection, the participants spent 10% more time monitoring the road, and responded less severely to a critical situation, suggesting a positive effect of the “see-through” technology.

Keywords

Automated driving Truck platooning Human machine interaction Takeover Eye tracking Response time 

References

  1. 1.
    Bergenhem, C., Shladover, S., Coelingh, E., Englund, C., Tsugawa, S.: Overview of platooning systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress, 22–26 October, Vienna, Austria (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alam, A., Besselink, B., Turri, V., Mårtensson, J., Johansson, K.H.: Heavy-duty vehicle platooning for sustainable freight transportation: a cooperative method to enhance safety and efficiency. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 35(6), 34–56 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Martens, M.H., Van den Beukel, A.P.: The road to automated driving: dual mode and human factors considerations. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems-(ITSC), 16th International IEEE Conference, pp. 2262–2267 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. Automatica 19(6), 775–779 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mackworth, N.H.: The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1(1), 6–21 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Körber, M., Schneider, W., Zimmermann, M.: Vigilance, boredom proneness and detection time of a malfunction in partially automated driving. In: 2015 International Conference, Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), pp. 70–76 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Willemsen, D., Stuiver, A., Hogema, J.: Automated driving functions giving control back to the driver: a simulator study on driver state dependent strategies. In: 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), No. 15-0109 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olaverri-Monreal, C., Gomes, P., Fernandes, R., Vieira, F., Ferreira, M.: The see-through system: a VANET-enabled assistant for overtaking maneuvers. In: 2010 IEEE, Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 123–128 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gomes, P., Vieira, F., Ferreira, M.: The see-through system: from implementation to test-drive. In: 2012 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), pp. 40–47 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Belyaev, E., Vinel, A., Egiazarian, K., Koucheryavy, Y.: Power control in see-through overtaking assistance system. IEEE Commun. Lett. 17(3), 612–615 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patra, S., Arnanz, J.H., Calafate, C.T., Cano, J.C., Manzoni, P.: EYES: a novel overtaking assistance system for vehicular networks. In: International Conference on Ad-Hoc Networks and Wireless, pp. 375–389 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    ISO, E. 15007-1: 2002. Straßenfahrzeuge-Messung des Blickverhaltens von Fahrern bei Fahrzeugen mit Fahrerinformations-und Fahrerassistenzsystemen-Teil 1: Begriffe und Parameter. Europäisches Komitee für Normung (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K.: “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1938–1942, Sage CA: Los Angeles (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo Zhang
    • 1
  • Ellen S. Wilschut
    • 2
  • Dehlia M. C. Willemsen
    • 3
  • Tom Alkim
    • 4
  • Marieke H. Martens
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.TNO Human FactorsSoesterbergThe Netherlands
  3. 3.TNO Integrated Vehicle SafetyHelmondThe Netherlands
  4. 4.RijkswaterstaatUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations