Advertisement

Effects of Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series (OHSAS) Standard: A Study on Core Competencies Building and Organizational Learning

  • Ebo Kwegyir-Afful
  • Emma Kwegyir-Afful
  • Richard Addo-Tenkorang
  • Jussi Kantola
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 594)

Abstract

Promoting the human factor of every organization is an important component that needs to be continuously up held to build employee competencies. Ultimately, this strengthens the competitiveness and sustainability of the operations within the organization. The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of occupational health and safety management system (OHSAS 18001-2007) and learning in organizations to building its core competencies. This case study was carried out by the Evolute web based research tool in four factories between May and August 2015. Results indicated that, the acquisition of OHSAS 18001:2007 standard improves employee work output as well as increases knowledge capacity. Thus, an appreciable level of occupational health and safety management system, practice and environment has positive employee effect and that, organizational learning can be facilitated by top management commitment and leadership. However, the need for an increase in tacit knowledge disbursement among employees was realized needed.

Keywords

Occupational health and safety Safety culture Organizational learning Knowledge management Knowledge creation and core competences building 

References

  1. 1.
    Morrison, A., Bergin-Seers, S.: Pro-growth small businesses: learning architecture. J. Manag. Dev. 21(5), 388–400 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu, W., et al.: The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: an organizational learning perspective. Sci. Direct 146, 346–358 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brian, B., Gerhart, B.: The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: progress and prospects. Acad. Manag. J. 39(4), 779–801 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nonaka, I.: Noboru: SECI, Ba and leadership: a united model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Plann. 33(4), 5–34 (2000). ElsevierMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J., Vázquez-Ordás, C.: Safety climate in OHSAS 18001-certified organizations: antecedents and consequences of safety behaviour. Sciencedirect 45, 745–758 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    OHSAS 18001:2007: OHSAS Project Group. Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems and Requirements. ISO:BSI, London (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO45001: A new International Standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems. BSI, London (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nonaka, I., Krogh, G.V.: Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: perspective: controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. 20(3), 635–652 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Örtenblad, A.: On differences between organizational learning and learning organization: the learning organization. Emerald Insight 8(3), 125–133 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    King, W.: Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning: Annals of Information Systems. Springer, Pittsburgh (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Senge, P.: The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday a division of Random House, Inc., New York (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Girard, N.: Knowledge at the boundary between science and society: a review of the use of farmers’ knowledge in agricultural development. J. Knowl. Manag. 19(5), 949–967 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Dell, C., Hubert, C.: The New Edge in Knowledge: How Knowledge Management is Changing the Way We Do Business. Wiley, Hoboken (2011). ISBN 978-0-470-91739-8Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Becerra-Fernandez, I., Sabherwal, R.: Knowledge Management: Systems and Processes. Armonk, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    King, W.R.: An integrated architecture for the effective knowledge organization. J. Knowl. Manag. 12(2), 1367–1380 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Porkka, L., Mäkinen, P.E., Vanharanta, H.: Safety culture research in a Finnish large-scale industrial park. J. Chem. Eng. Trans. 31(1), 361–366 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Markopoulos, E. et al.: Teamwork in Safety Culture on a Practical Occupational Level in Four Different European Union Member States (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kantola, J.: Organizational Resource Management – Theories, Methodologies and Applications, p. 138. CRC Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kwegyir-Afful, E.: Effects of occupational health and safety assessment series standard and organizational learning on core competencies building. Master’s thesis, Tritonia UVA, Vaasa (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nonaka, I., TakeucYhi, H.: The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Littlejohn, A., Milligan, C., Margaryan, A.: Charting collective knowledge: supporting self-regulated learning in the workplace. J. Workplace Learn. 3(24), 226–238 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ebo Kwegyir-Afful
    • 1
  • Emma Kwegyir-Afful
    • 2
  • Richard Addo-Tenkorang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jussi Kantola
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Department of ProductionUniversity of VaasaVaasaFinland
  2. 2.Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health & Clinical NutritionUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
  3. 3.Botswana International University of Science and Technology (BIUST)PalapyeBotswana

Personalised recommendations