Incorporating Stability of Mode Choice into an Agent-Based Travel Demand Model
Agent-based modelling is a promising technique, which allows to combine the advantages of different approaches to travel demand modelling. Agent-based modelling provides a framework that allows to easily substitute individual submodels. This paper shows, using the example of mobiTopp, how stability of mode choice can be integrated into an agent-based travel demand model. This has been achieved by replacing the submodel for mode choice by an extended variant, which takes stability of mode choice into account. The improved model reproduces this stability, as measured by two indicators based on mode usage and mobility styles, quite well.
KeywordsMode Choice Travel Behaviour Travel Demand Multinomial Logit Model Mode Usage
This work has been supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under grant No. VO 1791/4-1.
- 1.Adamowicz, W.L.: Habit formation and variety seeking in a discrete choice model of recreation demand. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 19(1), 19–31 (1994)Google Scholar
- 2.Arentze, T.A., Ettema, D., Timmermans, H.J.: Location choice in the context of multi-day activity-travel patterns: model development and empirical results. Transp. A: Transp. Sci. 9(2), 107–123 (2013)Google Scholar
- 3.Beckman, R.J., Baggerly, K.A., McKay, M.D.: Creating synthetic baseline populations. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 30(6), 415–429 (1996)Google Scholar
- 8.Heilig, M., Mallig, N., Schröder, O., Kagerbauer, M., Vortisch, P.: Implementation of free-floating and station-based carsharing in an agent-based travel demand model. Travel Behav. Soc. (2017). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.02.002
- 10.Hilgert, T., Heilig, M., Kagerbauer, M., Vortisch, P.: Modeling week activity schedules for travel demand models. In: 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, January 2017Google Scholar
- 13.Mallig, N., Vortisch, P.: Measuring stability of mode choice behavior. In: TRB 96th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, No. 17–01942, Accepted for Publication in Transportation Research Record, January 2017Google Scholar
- 14.Mueller, K., Axhausen, K.: Hierarchical IPF: generating a synthetic population for Switzerland. In: ERSA Conference Papers. European Regional Science Association (2011)Google Scholar
- 15.Outwater, M., Charlton, B.: The San Francisco model in practice: validation, testing, and application. In: Paper and Presentation for the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Innovations in Travel Demand Modeling Conference (2006)Google Scholar
- 18.Vij, A., Carrel, A., Walker, J.L.: Incorporating the influence of latent modal preferences on travel mode choice behavior. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 54, 164–178 (2013)Google Scholar
- 19.Yáñez, M.F., Cherchi, E., Ortúzar, J.D.D., Heydecker, B.G.: Inertia and shock effects on mode choice panel data: implications of the transantiago implementation. In: The 12th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Jaipur, India, 13–18 December 2009Google Scholar