The Charm of Salient Issues? Parties’ Strategic Behavior in Press Releases

  • Caroline Dalmus
  • Regula Hänggli
  • Laurent Bernhard


During election campaigns political actors strategically choose issues to focus on. Besides highlighting issues over which a party exerts issue ownership, they may also engage with issues highly salient in the media. The present chapter analyses under which conditions parties prefer focusing on the issues they own, and in which cases they rather pay attention to issues on the media agenda. A content analysis of press releases and newspaper coverage in Switzerland, Germany, France and Great Britain during national election campaigns shows that issue ownership matters across countries and explains quite well the parties’ issue selection strategies. However, exogenous events like crisis, scandals or catastrophes motivate to follow up on news coverage, even at the cost of owned issues.


  1. Abbe, O. G., Goodliffe, J., & Patterson, K. D. (2003). Agenda setting in congressional elections: The impact of issues and campaigns on voting behavior. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 419–430. doi: 10.1177/106591290305600404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1994). Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues-the joint effects of advertising and news coverage in campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(3), 335–357. doi: 10.1086/269431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bélanger, E., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 477–491. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandenburg, H. (2002). Who follows whom? The impact of parties on media agenda formation in the 1997 British general elections campaign. Harvard Journal of Press and Politics, 7(3), 34–54.Google Scholar
  6. Brandenburg, H. (2004). Manipulating the dimensions. A comparative study of campaign effects on media agenda formation. Paper prepared for ECPR joint sessions, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  7. Brettschneider, F. (2004). Agenda-setting, agenda-cutting, agenda-surfing. Themenmanagement bei der Bundestagswahl 2002. In H. Oberreuter (Ed.), Der versäumte Wechsel (pp. 9–34). München: Olzog.Google Scholar
  8. Boydstun, A. E., Bevan, S., & Thomas, H. F. (2014). The importance of attention diversity and how to measure it. Policy Studies Journal, 42(2), 173–196. doi: 10.1111/psj.12055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budge, I., & Farlie, D. J. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London and Boston: G. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. Dalmus, C., Hänggli, R., & Bernhard, L. (2016). Issue competition between parties across communication channels: An empirical analysis of the 2011 Swiss federal elections. NCCR Democracy working paper, 93.Google Scholar
  11. Dalton, R., Beck, P., Huckfeldt, R., & Koetzle, W. (1998). A test of the media-centred agenda-setting: Newspaper content and public interests in a presidential election. Political Communication, 15, 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Müller, W. C., & Winkler, A. K. (2014). How parties compete for votes: A test of saliency theory. European Journal of Political Research, 53, 57–76. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elmelund-Praestekaer, C. (2011). Mapping parties’ issue agenda in different channels of campaign ommunication: A wild goose chase? Javnost-the Public, 18(1), 37–51. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2011.11009050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geiss, S. (2011). Agenda builder oder agenda surfer? Eine Analyse der Thematisierungsmacht der Onlinekommunikation am Beispiel des Podcasts “Angela Merkel—die Kanzlerin direkt”. In J. F. M. Haschke, André Michael (Ed.), Politik - Deutsch, Deutsch - Politik: Aktuelle Trends und Forschungsergebnisse (pp. 133–156). Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
  15. Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media influence: When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40, 663–677. doi: 10.1017/S0007123410000037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haselmayer, M., Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. (2017). Partisan bias in message selection: Media gatekeeping of party press releases. Political Communication, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1265619.
  17. Helbling, M., & Tresch, A. (2011). Measuring party positions and issue salience from media coverage: Discussing and cross-validating new indicators. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 174–183. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helfer, L., & Van Aelst, P. (2016). What makes party messages fit for reporting? An experimental study of journalistic news selection. Political Communication, 33(1), 59–77. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2014.969464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Just, M. R., Crigler, A. N., Alger, D. E., Cook, T. E., Kern, M., & West, D. M. (1996). Crosstalk, citizen, candidates and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kepplinger, H. M., & Habermeier, J. (1995). The impact of key eventson the presentation of reality. European Journal of Communication, 10(3), 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lachat, R. (2014). Issue ownership and the vote: The effects of associative and competence ownership on issue voting. Swiss Political Science Review, 20(4), 727–740. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Norris, P., Curtice, J., Sanders, D., Scammell, M., & Semetko, H. A. (1999). On message. Communicating the campaign. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. doi: 10.2307/2111797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Petrocik, J. R., Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2003). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 599–626.Google Scholar
  26. Robertson, D. B. (1976). A theory of party competition. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Seeberg, H. B. (2016). How stable is political parties’ issue ownership? A cross-time, cross-national analysis. Political Studies, 1–18. doi: 10.1177/0032321716650224.
  28. Sides, J. (2006). The origins of campaign agendas. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 407–436. doi: 10.1017/S0007123406000226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sigelman, L., & Buell, E. H. (2004). Avoidance or engagement? Issue convergence in US presidential campaigns, 1960–2000. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 650–661. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00093.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tresch, A., Lefevere, J., & Walgrave, S. (2015). ‘Steal me if you can!’ The impact of campaign messages on associative issue ownership. Party Politics, 21(2), 198–208. doi: 10.1177/1354068812472576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tresch, A., Lefevere, J., & Walgrave, S. (2017). How parties’ issue emphasis strategies vary across communication channels: The 2009 regional election campaign in Belgium. Acta Politica, 1–23. doi  10.1057/s41269-016-0036-7.
  32. Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. (2014). Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics, 37(5), 1019–1045. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.911483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2007). Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Issue-party identifications in Belgium, 1991–2005. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(1), 37–67. doi: 10.1177/1081180X06297572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2016). Information and arena: The dual function of the news media for political elites. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 496–518. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walgrave, S., Tresch, A., & Lefevere, J. (2015). The conceptualisation and measurement of issue ownership. West European Politics, 38(4), 778–796. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline Dalmus
    • 1
  • Regula Hänggli
    • 1
  • Laurent Bernhard
    • 2
  1. 1.University of FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations