Aqua- and Mariculture Management: A Holistic Perspective on Best Practices

  • Marc H. TaylorEmail author
  • Lotta C. Kluger


This chapter presents an overview of some of the main issues facing the development of aqua- and mariculture, and provides a framework for improving sustainability from socio-economic and ecological perspectives. We review present global trends in productivity and the institutional and legal frameworks that may affect policy and trade in the coming years. Focus is placed on summarizing recent trends in socio-ecological approaches, such as the “Ecosystem Approach to Aquaculture”, which emphasizes development within the constraints of ecosystem functioning and social well-being. A framework of best practices for long-term sustainability is proposed, which is comprised of steps involving risk assessment, monitoring, and adaptive management. From this holistic perspective, we discuss the future prospects for aquaculture development in terms of its promise of improved food security, nutrition and income.


Sustainable development Ecosystem approach Aquaculture management 


  1. Alongi DM (2002) Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environ Conserv 29:331–349. doi: 10.1017/S0376892902000231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey C (2008) Human dimensions of an ecosystem approach to aquaculture. In: Soto D, Aguilar-Manjarrez J, Hishamunda N (eds) Building an ecosystem approach to aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 37–46Google Scholar
  3. Carver CEA, Mallet AL (1990) Estimating the carrying capacity of a coastal inlet for mussel culture. Aquaculture 88:39–53. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(90)90317-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castellanos-Galindo G, Baos R, Zapata L, (2016) Mariculture-induced introduction of cobia Rachycentron canadum (Linnaeus, 1766), a large predatory fish, in the Tropical Eastern Pacific. BioInvasions Records 5(1):55–58Google Scholar
  5. Christensen V, Pauly D (1993) Flow characteristics of aquatic ecosystems. In: Christensen V, Pauly D (eds) Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, pp 338–352Google Scholar
  6. Churchill R, Owen D (2010) The EC Common fisheries policy. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cicin-Sain B, Belfiore S (2005) Linking marine protected areas to integrated coastal and ocean management: A review of theory and practice. Ocean Coast Manage 48:847–868. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark JR, Garcia SM, Caddy JF (1992) Integrated management of coastal zones. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  9. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Maeem S, O’Neill R, Paruelo J, Raskin R, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa-Pierce BA (2002) Ecology as the paradigm for the future of aquaculture. In: Costa-Pierce BA (ed) Ecological aquaculture: the evolution of the Blue revolution. Blackwell Science Ltd., OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cromey CJ, Nickell TD, Black KD (2002) DEPOMOD — modelling the deposition and biological effects of waste solids from marine cage farms. Aquaculture 214:211–239. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00368-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dame RF, Prins TC (1998) Bivalve carrying capacity in coastal ecosystems. Aquat Ecol 31:409–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Environmental Justice Foundation (2003) Risky business: vietnamese shrimp aquaculture—impacts and improvements. Environmental Justice Foundation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Espinoza P, Bertrand A (2008) Revisiting Peruvian anchovy (Engraulis ringens) trophodynamics provides a new vision of the Humboldt Current system. Prog Oceanogr 79:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EU Commission (1999) Towards a European Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) Strategy: General principles and policy optionsGoogle Scholar
  16. EU Commission (2002) A strategy for the sustainable development of European aquaculture: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European ParliamentGoogle Scholar
  17. EU Commission (2012) Blue Growth: Opportunities for marine and maritime sustainable growth: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  18. EU Commission (2013) Strategic Guidelines for the sustainable development of EU aquaculture: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (2008a) Building an ecosystem approach to aquaculture. FAO/Universitat de les Illes Balears Expert Workshop, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 7–11 May 2007Google Scholar
  21. FAO (2008b) Understanding and applying risk analysis in aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. FAO (2014) The State of world fisheries and aquaculture: opportunities and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  23. FAO (2016) Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics: Global capture production 1950–2014 (FishStatJ). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferreira JG, Grant J, Verner-Jeffreys DW, Taylor NGH (2013) Modeling frameworks for determination of carrying capacity for aquaculture. In: Christou P, Savin R, Costa-Pierce BA, Misztal I, Whitelaw B (eds) Sustainable food production. Springer, New York, pp 417–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferreira JG, Hawkins AJS, Bricker SB (2007) Management of productivity, environmental effects and profitability of shellfish aquaculture—the Farm Aquaculture Resource Management (FARM) model. Aquaculture 264:160–174. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferreira JG, Sequeira A, Hawkins AJS, Newton A, Nickell TD, Pastres R, Forte J, Bodoy A, Bricker SB (2009) Analysis of coastal and offshore aquaculture: application of the FARM model to multiple systems and shellfish species. Aquaculture 292:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Folke C, Kautsky N (1991) Ecological economic principles for aquaculture development. In: Cowey CB, Cho CY (eds) Nutritional strategies and aquaculture wastes. University of Guelph Press, Guelph, ON, pp 207–222Google Scholar
  28. Folke C, Kautsky N (1992) Aquaculture with its environment: prospects for sustainability. Ocean Coast Manag 17:5–24. doi: 10.1016/0964-5691(92)90059-T CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Folke C, Kautsky N, Berg H, Jannson A, Troell M (1998) The ecological footprint concept for sustainable seafood production: a review. Ecol Appl 8:63–71. doi: 10.2307/2641363. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fréon P, Sueiro JC, Iriarte F et al (2014) Harvesting for food versus feed: a review of Peruvian fisheries in a global context. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24:381–398. doi: 10.1007/s11160-013-9336-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fry JP, Love DC, Shukla A, Lee RM (2014) Offshore finfish aquaculture in the United States: an examination of federal laws that could be used to address environmental and occupational public health risks. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:11964–11985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111111964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. García SM, Zerbi A, Aliaume C et al (eds) (2003) The ecosystem approach to fisheries: issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  33. Geček S, Legović T (2010) Towards carrying capacity assessment for aquaculture in the Bolinao Bay, Philippines: a numerical study of tidal circulation. Ecol Model 221:1394–1412. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. GESAMP (1991) Reducing environmental impacts of coastal aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  35. GESAMP (2008) Assessment and communication of environmental risks in coastal aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  36. Goodland R (1997) Environmental sustainability in agriculture: diet matters. Ecol Econ 23:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gowing JW, Tuong TP, Hoanh CT (2006) Land and water management in coastal zones: dealing with agriculture-aquaculture-fishery conflicts. In: Hoanh CT, Tuong TP, Gowing JW, Hardy B (eds) Environmental livelihoods in tropical coastal zones: managing agriculture-fishery-aquaculture conflicts. CABI Publishing, London, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  38. Hamilton S (2013) Assessing the role of commercial aquaculture in displacing mangrove forest. Bull Mar Sci 89:585–601. doi: 10.5343/bms.2012.1069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Hovik S, Stokke KB (2007) Balancing aquaculture with other coastal interests: A study of regional planning as a tool for ICZM in Norway. Ocean Coast Manag 50:887–904. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2007.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Inglis GJ, Hayden BJ, Ross AH (2000) An overview of factors affecting the carrying capacity of coastal embayments for mussel culture. NIWA Client Report CHC00/69, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  42. Jonell M, Phillips M, Rönnbäck P, Troell M (2013) Eco-certification of farmed seafood: will it make a difference? Ambio 42:659–674. doi: 10.1007/s13280-013-0409-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kluger LC, Taylor MH, Mendo J et al (2016) Carrying capacity simulations as a tool for ecosystem-based management of a scallop aquaculture system. Ecol Model 331:44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Korn M (1996) The dike-pond concept: sustainable agriculture and nutrient recycling in China. Ambio 25:6–13Google Scholar
  45. Krause G, Brugere C, Diedrich A et al (2015) A revolution without people? Closing the people–policy gap in aquaculture development. Aquaculture 447:44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MAP (2012) The ICZM process—a roadmap towards coastal sustainabilityGoogle Scholar
  47. McCleave J, Xiongzhi X, Huasheng H (2003) Lessons learned from “decentralized” ICM: an analysis of Canada’s Atlantic Coastal Action Program and China’s Xiamen ICM Program. Ocean Coast Manag 46:59–76. doi: 10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00121-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKindsey CW, Thetmeyer H, Landry T, Silvert W (2006) Review of recent carrying capacity models for bivalve culture and recommendations for research and management. Aquaculture 261:451–462. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.06.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mendo J, Wolff M, Mendo T, Ysla L (2016) Scallop fishery and culture in Peru. In: Shumway SE, Parsons GJ (eds) Scallops: biology, ecology, aquaculture, and fisheries. Elsevier Science Ltd, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  50. NOAA (2015) Marine aquaculture strategic plan: 2016–2020. NOAA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  51. Odum EP, Odum HT (1959) Fundamentals of ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  52. Pauly D, Christensen V (1995) Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374:255–257. doi: 10.1038/374255a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Phillips JM, Harlan AD, Krumhar KC et al (1978) Studies of potential biological components of closed life support systems for large space habitats: research and technology development requirements, costs, priorities and terrestrial impacts. NASA Ames Research Center, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  54. Pikitch EK, Santora C, Babcock EA et al (2004) Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science 305:346–347. doi: 10.1126/science.1098222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pillay TVR, Kutty MN (2005) Aquaculture: principles and practices. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  56. Powers A, Smith O (2008) Emerging ocean uses. In: Baur DC, Eichenberg T, Sutton M (eds) Ocean and coastal law and policy. American Bar Association. American Bar Association, Chicago, pp 443–476Google Scholar
  57. Pullin RS, Froese R, Pauly D (2007) Indicators for the sustainability of aquaculture. In: Bert TM (ed) Ecological and genetic implications of aquaculture activities. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rees WE, Wackernagel M (1994) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: measuring the natural capital requirements of the human economy. In: Jansson A, Hammer M, Folke C, Costanza R (eds) Investing in natural capital: the ecological economics approach to sustainability. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 223–248Google Scholar
  59. Ross LG, Telfer TC, Falconer L et al (2013) Carrying capacities and site selection within the ecosystem approach to aquaculture. In: Ross LG, Telfer TC, Falconer L, Soto D (eds), Site selection and carrying capacities for inland and coastal aquaculture, Rome, FAO, pp 19–46Google Scholar
  60. Shelby B, Heberlein TA et al (1987) Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Oregon State University Press, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  61. Smaal AC, Prins TC, Dankers N, Ball B (1998) Minimum requirements for modelling bivalve carrying capacity. Aquat Ecol 31:423–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stead SM, Burnell G, Goulletquer P (2002) Aquaculture and its role in Integrated Coastal Zone Management. Aquac Int 10:447–468. doi: 10.1023/A:1023926421723. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stigebrandt A (2011) Carrying capacity: general principles of model construction. Aquac Res 42:41–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02674.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stigebrandt A, Aure J, Ervik A, Hansen PK (2004) Regulating the local environmental impact of intensive marine fish farming: III. A model for estimation of the holding capacity in the Modelling-Ongrowing fish farm-Monitoring system. Aquaculture 234:239–261. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.11.029. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tacon AGJ, Metian M (2008) Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: Trends and future prospects. Aquaculture 285:146–158. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tacon AGJ, Metian M, Turchini GM, De Silva SS (2010) Responsible aquaculture and trophic level implications to global fish supply. Rev Fish Sci 18:94–105. doi: 10.1080/10641260903325680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tam J, Taylor MH, Blaskovic V et al (2008) Trophic modeling of the Northern Humboldt Current Ecosystem, Part I: Comparing trophic linkages under La Niña and El Niño conditions. Prog Oceanogr 79:352–365. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2008.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Taylor MH, Wolff M, Mendo J, Yamashiro C (2008) Changes in trophic flow structure of Independence Bay (Peru) over an ENSO cycle. Prog Oceanogr 79:336–351. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2008.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Toufique KA, Gregory R (2008) Common waters and private lands: Distributional impacts of floodplain aquaculture in Bangladesh. Food Policy 33:587–594. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wackernagel M, Rees W (1998) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola IslandGoogle Scholar
  71. Walters C (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. Macmillan Publishing Company, LaxenburgGoogle Scholar
  72. Walters C (1997) Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conserv Ecol 1:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weise AM, Cromey CJ, Callier MD et al (2009) Shellfish-DEPOMOD: modelling the biodeposition from suspended shellfish aquaculture and assessing benthic effects. Aquaculture 288:239–253. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ytrestøyl T, Aas TS, Åsgård T (2015) Utilisation of feed resources in production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway. Aquaculture 448:365–374. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ytrestøyl T, Aas TS, Berge GM et al (2011) Resource utilisation and eco-efficiency of Norwegian salmon farming in 2010. Nofima, TromsoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thünen Institute of Sea FisheriesHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Leibniz Center for Tropical Marine ResearchBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations