Advertisement

Introducing Fundamental Concepts of Process Modeling Through Participatory Simulation

  • Stefan Oppl
  • Stijn Hoppenbrouwers
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 286)

Abstract

Due to the ubiquitous deployment of information systems in today’s organizational work settings, the importance of process modeling skills is undisputed not only for techno-centric roles in organizations, but also for more business-oriented positions. The ability to understand and shape work processes through modeling practices is important to actively contribute to information system design. How to facilitate the development of modeling skills for a non-technology-proficient target group has hardly been subject of research. We aim at addressing this issue with an experiential learning approach using participatory simulations of process models. By letting participants experience work processes and reflect on their underlying structure, we aim at facilitating the development of an abstract conceptual understanding, which can then be validated by actively experimenting with process modifications. In the present paper, we introduce the conceptual foundations of our approach, and describe the interactive system we have developed to facilitate the participatory simulation process. Initial findings from an exploratory study with the system indicate that it can support experiential learning processes.

Keywords

Experiential learning Interactive process simulation Business process modeling education 

References

  1. 1.
    Fayoumi, A., Loucopoulos, P.: Conceptual modeling for the design of intelligent and emergent information systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 59, 174–194 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Korhonen, J.J., Kaidalova, J.: Enterprise modeling facilitating business and IT alignment along the social dimension: stakeholder intentions for model-based communication and coordination. In: Proceeding of Business Informatics (CBI) (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Recker, J.C., Reijers, H.A., van de Wouw, S.G.: Process model comprehension: the effects of cognitive abilities, learning style, and strategy. CAIS 34, 199–222 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frederiks, P.J.M., van der Weide, T.P.: Information modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants. Data Knowl. Eng. 58, 4–20 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Front, A., Rieu, D., Santorum, M., Movahedian, F.: A participative end-user method for multi-perspective business process elicitation and improvement. In: SoSyM, pp. 1–24 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Antunes, P., Simões, D., Carriço, L., Pino, J.A.: An end-user approach to business process modeling. J. Network Comput. Appl. 36, 1466–1479 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aghaee, S., Pautasso, C.: End-user development of mashups with naturalmash. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25, 414–432 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dasgupta, S., Resnick, M.: Engaging novices in programming, experimenting, and learning with data. ACM Inroads 5, 72–75 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morris, W.T.: On the art of modeling. Manage. Sci. 13, B-707–B-717 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stewart, G., Rosemann, M.: Process modeling: a teaching approach for developing generic skills in IT students. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACIS, pp. 20–27 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Recker, J.C., Rosemann, M.: Teaching business process modelling: experiences and recommendations. CAIS 25, 32 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ravesteyn, P., Versendaal, J.: Design and implementation of business process management curriculum: a case in dutch higher education. In: Reynolds, N., Turcsányi-Szabó, M. (eds.) KCKS 2010. IFIPAICT, vol. 324, pp. 310–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15378-5_30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bider, I., Henkel, M., Kowalski, S., Perjons, E.: Technology enhanced learning of modeling skills in the field of information systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th IADIS (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Powell, S.: The teachers’ forum: six key modeling heuristics. Interfaces 25, 114 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Powell, S.G., Willemain, T.R.: How novices formulate models. Part I: qualitative insights and implications for teaching. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58, 983–995 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Desel, J.: Teaching system modeling, simulation and validation. In: Proceeding of the 32nd Conference on Winter Simulation (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buur, J., Ankenbrand, B., Mitchell, R.: Participatory business modelling. CoDesign 9, 55–71 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thatcher, D.C.: Promoting learning through games and simulations. Simul. Gaming 21, 262–273 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., Ben-Ari, M.: Learning computer science concepts with scratch. Comput. Sci. Educ. 23, 239–264 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aghaee, S., Pautasso, C., De Angeli, A.: Natural end-user development of web mashups. In: Proceeding of VL/HCC 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sedrakyan, G., Snoeck, M., Poelmans, S.: Assessing the effectiveness of feedback enabled simulation in teaching conceptual modeling. Comput. Educ. 78, 367–382 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Repenning, A., Ioannidou, A.: What makes end-user development tick? 13 design guidelines. In: Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) End User Development. HCI, vol. 9, pp. 51–85. Springer, Netherlands (2010). doi: 10.1007/1-4020-5386-X_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smeds, R.: Simulation for accelerated learning and development in industrial management. Prod. Plann. Control 14, 107–110 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clancey, W.J., Sachs, P., Sierhuis, M., van Hoof, R.: Brahms: simulating practice for work systems design. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 49, 831–865 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smedt, J., Weerdt, J., Serral, E., Vanthienen, J.: Gamification of declarative process models for learning and model verification. In: Reichert, M., Reijers, Hajo A. (eds.) BPM 2015. LNBIP, vol. 256, pp. 432–443. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oppl, S.: Business process elaboration through virtual enactment. In: Proceedings of S-BPM ONE 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fleischmann, A., Stary, C.: Whom to talk to? A stakeholder perspective on business process development. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 11, 125–150 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., Ross, G.: The role of tutoring in problem solving. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 17, 89–100 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dennen, V.P.: Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. Handbook Res. Educ. Commun. Technol. 2, 813–828 (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Oppl, S., Hoppenbrouwers, S.: Scaffolding Stakeholder-Centric Enterprise Model Articulation. In: The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. pp. 133–147. Springer (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ellson, J., Gansner, E., Koutsofios, L., North, S.C., Woodhull, G.: Graphviz—open source graph drawing tools. In: Presented at the International Symposium on Graph Drawing (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Software ScienceRadboud UniversityNijmegenNetherlands
  2. 2.Department of Business Information Systems – Communications EngineeringJohannes Kepler University LinzLinzAustria
  3. 3.Model-Based IS GroupHAN University of Applied SciencesArnhemNetherlands

Personalised recommendations