From Ecological Informatics to the Generation of Ecological Knowledge: Long-Term Research in the English Lake District

  • S. C. Maberly
  • D. Ciar
  • J. A. Elliott
  • I. D. Jones
  • C. S. Reynolds
  • S. J. Thackeray
  • I. J. Winfield


Lakes are highly connected systems that are affected by a hierarchy of stressors operating at different scales, making them particularly sensitive to anthropogenic perturbation. Traditionally, lakes are studied as a whole system ‘from physics to fish’ and long-term monitoring programmes were initiated on this basis, some starting over a century ago. This chapter describes the long-term monitoring programme on the Cumbrian lakes, UK, how it is operated and how its scientific value is increased by combining it with additional activities. Case-studies are presented on the advances long-term research has made to testing ecological theory and understanding teleconnexions and phenology. Automatic high-frequency measurements are an important complementary approach that has been made possible by technological revolutions in computing, and telecommunications. They provide a window into the true dynamic nature of lakes that cannot be achieved by manual sampling. The large volume of data produced can now be quality controlled and analysed by bespoke software that has been developed in recent years by a global network of lake and data scientists. Finally, lake models constructed using the insights from monitoring, as well as experiments, are powerful ways to identify knowledge gaps and allow forecasts to be made of future responses to environmental change or management intervention. As other approaches become incorporated into lake research, such as Earth Observation and citizen science, the scale of knowledge about the system will increase, improving our ability to provide robust scientific advice for the sustainable management of these fragile, but important ecosystems.



We are grateful to the many individuals (too numerous to name here) who have participated in collecting the data and to the Freshwater Biological Association for its invaluable historical role in the production of the early long-term data. We dedicate this chapter to the late JWG Lund (1912–2015) and ED Le Cren (1922–2011) who were instrumental in starting much of the long-term research in Cumbria. This research, carried out today by CEH, is supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council.


  1. Allen KR (1935) The food and migration of the perch (Perca fluviatilis) in Windermere. J Anim Ecol 4:264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson A, Harmer RA, Widdicombe CE et al (2015) Questioning the role of phenology shifts and trophic mismatching in a planktonic food web. Prog Oceanogr 137:498–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell VA, George DG, Moore RJ et al (2006) Using a 1-D mixing model to simulate the vertical flux of heat and oxygen in a lake subject to episodic mixing. Ecol Model 190:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernhardt J, Elliott JA, Jones ID (2008) Modelling the effects on phytoplankton communities of changing mixed depth and background extinction coefficient on three contrasting lakes in the English Lake District. Freshw Biol 53:2573–2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkhead T (2014) Stormy outlook for long-term ecology studies. Nature 514:405–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bucke D, Cawley G, Craig J et al (1979) Further studies of an epizootic of perch Perca fluviatilis L., of uncertain aetiology. J Fish Dis 2:297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canfield DE, Brown CD, Bachmann RW et al (2002) Volunteer lake monitoring: testing the reliability of data collected by the Florida LAKEWATCH program. Lake Reservoir Manage 18:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Compton M, Barnaghi P, Bermudez L et al (2012) The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. J Web Semant 17:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conover H, Berthiau G, Botts M et al (2010) Using sensor web protocols for environmental data acquisition and management. Ecol Inform 5:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craig JF, Fletcher JM, Winfield IJ (2015) Insights into percid population and community biology and ecology from a 70 year (1943 to 2013) study of perch Perca fluviatilis in Windermere, U.K. In: Couture P, Pyle G (eds) Biology of Perch. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 148–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davison W, Hill M, Woof C et al (1994) Continuous measurement of stream pH. Evaluation of procedures and comparison of resulting hydrogen ion budgets with those from flow-weighted integrating samplers. Water Res 28:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliott JA (2010) The seasonal sensitivity of Cyanobacteria and other phytoplankton to changes in flushing rate and water temperature. Glob Chang Biol 16:864–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott JA (2012) Predicting the impact of changing nutrient load and temperature on the phytoplankton of England’s largest lake, Windermere. Freshw Biol 57:400–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliott JA, Bell VA (2011) Predicting the potential long-term influence of climate change on vendace (Coregonus albula) habitat in Bassenthwaite Lake, U.K. Freshw Biol 56:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott JA, Reynolds CS (2010) Modelling phytoplankton dynamics in freshwaters: affirmation of the PROTECH approach to simulation. Freshw Rev 3:75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliott JA, Thackeray SJ (2004) The simulation of phytoplankton in shallow and deep lakes using PROTECH. Ecol Model 178:357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliott JA, Irish AE, Reynolds CS et al (2000a) Modelling freshwater phytoplankton communities: an exercise in validation. Ecol Model 128:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliott JM, Hurley MA, Maberly SC (2000b) The emergence period of sea trout fry in a Lake District stream correlates with the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Fish Biol 56:208–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elliott JA, Jones ID, Thackeray SJ (2006) Testing the sensitivity of phytoplankton communities to changes in water temperature and nutrient load, in a temperate lake. Hydrobiologia 559:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farman JC, Gardiner BG, Shanklin JD (1985) Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction. Nature 315:207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feuchtmayr H, Thackeray SJ, Jones ID et al (2012) Spring phytoplankton phenology - are patterns and drivers of change consistent among lakes in the same climatological region? Freshw Biol 57:331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foley B, Jones ID, Maberly SC et al (2012) Long-term changes in oxygen depletion in a small temperate lake: effects of climate change and eutrophication. Freshw Biol 57:278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frempong E (1983) Diel aspects of the thermal structure and energy budget of a small English lake. Freshw Biol 13:89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fretwell SD, Lucas HLJ (1969) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. 1. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. George DG (2002) Regional-scale influences on the long-term dynamics of lake plankton. In: PJlB W, Thomas DN, Reynolds CS (eds) Phytoplankton productivity: carbon assimilation in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 265–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. George DG, Taylor AH (1995) UK lake plankton and the Gulf Stream. Nature 378:139–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. George DG, Maberly SC, Hewitt DP (2004) The influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation on the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of four lakes in the English Lake District. Freshw Biol 49:760–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. George DG, Bell VA, Parker J et al (2006) Using a 1-D mixing model to assess the potential impact of year-to-year changes in weather on the habitat of vendace (Coregonus albula) in Bassenthwaite Lake, Cumbria. Freshw Biol 51:1407–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hänfling B, Lawson Handley L, Read DS et al (2016) Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods. Mol Ecol 25:3101–3119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hateley J, Clabburn P, Drastik V et al (2013) Standardisation of hydroacoustic techniques for fish in fresh waters. In: Papadakis JS, Bjorno L (eds) Proceedings of the first underwater acoustics conference. FORTH Institute of Applied & Computational Mathematics, Heraklin, Greece, pp 1595–1600Google Scholar
  31. Haugen TO, Winfield IJ, Vollestad LA et al (2006) The ideal free pike: 50 years of fitness-maximizing dispersal in Windermere. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:2917–2924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heaney SI, Lund JWG, Canter HM et al (1988) Population dynamics of Ceratium spp. in three English lakes, 1945-1985. Hydrobiologia 161:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hurrell JW (1995) Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269:676–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014. Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessmnet report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Jennings E, Jones SE, Arvola L et al (2012) Effects of weather-related episodic events in lakes: an analysis based on high-frequency data. Freshw Biol 57:589–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones ID, Winfield IJ, Carse F (2008) Assessment of long-term changes in habitat availability for Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) in a temperate lake using oxygen profiles and hydroacoustic surveys. Freshw Biol 53:393–402Google Scholar
  37. Kipling C (1972) The commercial fisheries of Windermere. Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society 72: 156–204Google Scholar
  38. Lack TJ, Lund JWG (1974) Observations and experiments on phytoplankton of Blelham Tarn, English Lake District- Experimental tubes. Freshw Biol 4:399–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lampert W, McCauley E, Manly BFJ (2003) Trade-offs in the vertical distribution of zooplankton: ideal free distribution with costs? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:765–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Le Cren D (2001) The Windermere perch and pike project: an historical review. Freshw Forum 15:3–34Google Scholar
  41. Liboriussen L, Landkildehus F, Meerhoff M et al (2005) Global warming: design of a flow-through shallow lake mesocosm climate experiment. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 3:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lottig NR, Wagner T, Henry EN et al (2014) Long-term citizen-collected data reveal geographical patterns and temporal trends in lake water clarity. PLoS One 9:e95769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maberly SC (1996) Diel, episodic and seasonal changes in pH and concentrations of inorganic carbon in a productive lake. Freshw Biol 35:579–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maberly SC, Elliott JA (2012) Insights from long-term studies in the Windermere catchment: external stressors, internal interactions and the structure and function of lake ecosystems. Freshw Biol 57:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mackereth FJH, Heron J, Talling JF (1978) Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication: 1–120Google Scholar
  46. Meis S, Thackeray SJ, Jones ID (2009) Effects of recent climate change on phytoplankton phenology in a temperate lake. Freshw Biol 54:1888–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mills JA, Teplitsky C, Arroyo B et al (2015) Archiving primary data: solutions for long-term studies. Trends Ecol Evol 30:581–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mills JA, Teplitsky C, Arroyo B et al (2016) Solutions for archiving data in long-term studies: a reply to Whitlock et al. Trends Ecol Evol 31:85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moss B (2012) Cogs in the endless machine: lakes, climate change and nutrient cycles: a review. Sci Total Environ 434:130–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nisbet E (2007) Earth monitoring: cinderella science. Nature 450:789–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Norton L, Elliott JA, Maberly SC et al (2012) Using models to bridge the gap between land use and algal blooms: an example from the Loweswater catchment, UK. Environ Model Softw 36:64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ohlberger J, Langangen O, Edeline E et al (2011) Stage-specific biomass overcompensation by juveniles in response to increased adult mortality in a wild fish population. Ecology 92:2175–2182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ohlberger J, Thackeray SJ, Winfield IJ et al (2014) When phenology matters: age-size truncation alters population response to trophic mismatch. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281:20140938. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0938 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paxton CGM, Winfield IJ, Fletcher JM et al (2004) Biotic and abiotic influences on the recruitment of male perch in Windermere, UK. J Fish Biol 65:1622–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pearsall WH, Pennington P (1947) Ecological history of the English Lake District. J Ecol 34:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pickering AD (2001) Windermere: restoring the health of England’s largest lake. Freshwater Biological Association, KendalGoogle Scholar
  57. Read JS, Hamilton DP, Jones ID et al (2011) Derivation of lake mixing and stratification indices from high-resolution lake buoy data. Environ Model Softw 26:1325–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reynolds CS (1989) Physical determinants of phytoplankton succession. In: Sommer U (ed) Plankton ecology: succession in plankton communities. Springer, New York, pp 9–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reynolds CS (1990) Temporal scales of variability in pelagic environments and the response of phytoplankton. Freshw Biol 23:25–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reynolds CS (1997) Successional development, energetics and diversity in planktonic communities. In: Abe T, Levin SR, Higashi M (eds) Biodiversity: an ecological perspective. Springer, New York, pp 167–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reynolds CS, Thompson JM, Ferguson AJD et al (1982) Loss processes in the population dynamics of phytoplankton maintained in closed systems. J Plankton Res 4:561–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reynolds CS, Wiseman SW, Godfrey BM et al (1983) Some effects of artificial mxing on the dynamics of phytoplankton populations in large limnetic enclosures. J Plankton Res 5:203–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reynolds CS, Irish AE, Elliott JA (2001) The ecological basis for simulating phytoplankton responses to environmental change (PROTECH). Ecol Model 140:271–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reynolds CS, Maberly SC, Parker JE et al (2012) Forty years of monitoring water quality in Grasmere (English Lake District): separating the effects of enrichment by treated sewage and hydraulic flushing on phytoplankton ecology. Freshw Biol 57:384–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roy HE, Preston CD, Roy DB (2015) Fifty years of the Biological Records Centre. Biol J Linn Soc 115:469–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sand-Jensen K (1997) The origin of the Freshwater Biological Laboratory. In: Sand-Jensen K, Pedersen O (eds) Freshwater Biology Priorities and development in Danish Research. G.E.C. Gad, Copenhagen, pp 9–15Google Scholar
  67. Schindler DW (1990) Experimental pertubrations of whole lakes as test of hypotheses concerning ecosystem structure and function. Oikos 57:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shepherd TD, Litvak MK (2004) Density-dependent habitat selection and the ideal free distribution in marine fish spatial dynamics: considerations and cautions. Fish Fish 5:141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Solomon CT, Bruesewitz DA, Richardson DC et al (2013) Ecosystem respiration: drivers of daily variability and background respiration in lakes around the globe. Limnol Oceanogr 58:849–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Straile D (2000) Meteorological forcing of plankton dynamics in a large and deep continental European lake. Oecologia 122:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Strong C, Maberly SC (2011) The influence of atmospheric wave dynamics on interannual variation in the surface temperature of lakes in the English Lake District. Glob Chang Biol 17:2013–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Talling JF (1993) Comparative seasonal changes, and interannual variability and stability, in a 26-year record of total phytoplankton biomass in 4 English lake basins. Hydrobiologia 268:65–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Talling JF (1999) Some English lakes as diverse and active ecosystems: a factual summary and source book. Freshwater Biological Association, KendalGoogle Scholar
  74. Talling JF (2008) The developmental history of inland-water science. Freshw Rev 1:119–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. ten Brink H, Mazumdar AKA, Huddart J et al (2015) Do intraspecific or interspecific interactions determine responses to predators feeding on a shared size-structured prey community? J Anim Ecol 84:414–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thackeray SJ, Jones ID, Maberly SC (2008) Long-term change in the phenology of spring phytoplankton: species-specific responses to nutrient enrichment and climatic change. J Ecol 96:523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thackeray SJ, Sparks TH, Frederiksen M et al (2010) Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments. Glob Chang Biol 16:3304–3313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thackeray SJ, Henrys PA, Jones ID et al (2012) Eight decades of phenological change for a freshwater cladoceran: what are the consequences of our definition of seasonal timing? Freshw Biol 57:345–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Thackeray SJ, Henrys PA, Feuchtmayr H et al (2013) Food web de-synchronization in England’s largest lake: an assessment based on multiple phenological metrics. Glob Chang Biol 19:3568–3580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thorncroft CD, Hoskins BJ, McIntyre MF (1993) Two paradigms of baroclinic-wave life-cycle behaviour. Q J R Meteorol Soc 119:17–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Trolle D, Hamilton DP, Hipsey MR et al (2012) A community-based framework for aquatic ecosystem models. Hydrobiologia 683:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Whitlock MC, Bronstein JL, Bruna EM et al (2016) A balanced data archiving policy for long-term studies. Trends Ecol Evol 31:84–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Williamson CE, Dodds W, Kratz TK et al (2008) Lakes and streams as sentinels of environmental change in terrestrial and atmospheric processes. Front Ecol Environ 6:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Winfield IJ, Fletcher JM, James JB (2007) Seasonal variability in the abundance of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)) recorded using hydroacoustics in Windermere, UK and its implications for survey design. Ecol Freshw Fish 16:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Winfield IJ, Fletcher JM, James JB (2008a) The Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) populations of Windermere, UK: population trends associated with eutrophication, climate change and increased abundance of roach (Rutilus rutilus). Environ Biol Fish 83:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Winfield IJ, James JB, Fletcher JM (2008b) Northern pike (Esox lucius) in a warming lake: changes in population size and individual condition in relation to prey abundance. Hydrobiologia 601:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Winfield IJ, Fletcher JM, James JB (2012) Long-term changes in the diet of pike (Esox lucius), the top aquatic predator in a changing Windermere. Freshwater Biol 57:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Woolway RI, Jones ID, Hamilton DP et al (2015) Automated calculation of surface energy fluxes with high-frequency lake buoy data. Environ Model Softw 70:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Woolway RI, Jones ID, Maberly SC et al (2016) Diel surface temperature range scales with lake size. PLoS One 11:e0152466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Worthington EB (1942) The Windermere perch fishery, and possibilities of its expansion. Fishing Gazette, 3 Jan 1942Google Scholar
  91. Worthington EB (1950) An experiment with populations of fish in Windermere, 1939-48. Proc Zool Soc London 120:113–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wuest A, Piepke G, Van Senden DC (2000) Turbulent kinetic energy balance as a tool for estimating vertical diffusivity in wind-forced stratified waters. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1388–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. C. Maberly
    • 1
  • D. Ciar
    • 1
  • J. A. Elliott
    • 1
  • I. D. Jones
    • 1
  • C. S. Reynolds
    • 1
  • S. J. Thackeray
    • 1
  • I. J. Winfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment CentreLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations