In Search of Balance: The Challenge of Generating Balanced Latin Rectangles

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10335)

Abstract

Spatially Balanced Latin Squares are combinatorial structures of great importance for experimental design. From a computational perspective they present a challenging problem and there is a need for efficient methods to generate them. Motivated by a real-world application, we consider a natural extension to this problem, balanced Latin Rectangles. Balanced Latin Rectangles appear to be even more defiant than balanced Latin Squares, to such an extent that perfect balance may not be feasible for Latin rectangles. Nonetheless, for real applications, it is still valuable to have well balanced Latin rectangles. In this work, we study some of the properties of balanced Latin rectangles, prove the nonexistence of perfect balance for an infinite family of sizes, and present several methods to generate the most balanced solutions.

Keywords

Latin Rectangles Experimental design Local search Constraint satisfaction problem Mixed-integer programming 

References

  1. 1.
    Ermon, S., Gomes, C.P., Sabharwal, A., Selman, B.: Low-density parity constraints for hashing-based discrete integration. In: Proceedings of the 31th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2014, Beijing, China, 21–26 June 2014, pp. 271–279 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fahle, T., Schamberger, S., Sellmann, M.: Symmetry breaking. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) CP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2239, pp. 93–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). doi:10.1007/3-540-45578-7_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gent, I.P., Smith, B.M.: Symmetry breaking in constraint programming. In: Proceedings of ECAI-2000, pp. 599–603. IOS Press (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gomes, C., Sellmann, M., Van ES, C., Van Es, H.: The challenge of generating spatially balanced scientific experiment designs. In: Régin, J.-C., Rueher, M. (eds.) CPAIOR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3011, pp. 387–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24664-0_28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gomes, C.P., Hoffmann, J., Sabharwal, A., Selman, B.: Short XORs for model counting: from theory to practice. In: Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.A. (eds.) SAT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4501, pp. 100–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72788-0_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gomes, C.P., Sabharwal, A., Selman, B.: Model counting: a new strategy for obtaining good bounds. In: Proceedings, The Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Eighteenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 16–20 July 2006, pp. 54–61 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gomes, C.P., Sellmann, M.: Streamlined constraint reasoning. In: Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2004, 10th International Conference, CP 2004, Toronto, Canada, 27 September–1 October 2004, Proceedings, pp. 274–289 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gomes, C.P., van Hoeve, W.J., Sabharwal, A., Selman, B.: Counting CSP solutions using generalized XOR constraints. In: AAAI, pp. 204–209 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Hentenryck, P., Michel, L.: Differentiable invariants. In: Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2006, 12th International Conference, CP 2006, Nantes, France, 25–29 September 2006, Proceedings, pp. 604–619 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le Bras, R., Gomes, C.P., Selman, B.: From streamlined combinatorial search to efficient constructive procedures. In: AAAI (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Le Bras, R., Perrault, A., Gomes, C.: Polynomial time construction for spatially balanced Latin squares (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rossi, F., Van Beek, P., Walsh, T.: Handbook of Constraint Programming. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith, C., Gomes, C., Fernandez, C.: Streamlining local search for spatially balanced Latin squares. In: IJCAI, vol. 5, pp. 1539–1541. Citeseer (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Es, H., Van Es, C.: Spatial nature of randomization and its effect on the outcome of field experiments. Agron. J. 85(2), 420–428 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Applied MathematicsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations