Advertisement

Is the Québec Secession Movement Dead? Perspectives After Canada’s 2015 Federal Election

  • Julián Castro-ReaEmail author
  • Jessica Weller
Chapter

Abstract

Recent superficial analyses argue that the decline in support for nationalist parties in Québec is an expression of the fact that separation of that province from Canada is a political issue that is declining and will eventually disappear. However, reality in the field shows a whole different story. Sovereigntist parties (Parti Québécois, Bloc Québécois) retain a core constituency no matter what, and support for sovereignty has remained strong in the province. More importantly, opinion polls on sovereignty remain consistent with a cyclical pattern, affected by political events of the time.

This article shows that support for the sovereignty option in Québec depends on two main variables: the strategies that are adopted by parties and organizations in favour of sovereignty, and the policies put forward by the federal government, changing the institutional environment within which the debate takes place. Federal policies have so far been more successful than sovereigntist strategies, and this has affected mostly organizations favouring sovereignty rather than the independence option itself.

Evidence to test this hypothesis is gathered by analyzing the political developments related to the debate occurred after the 1995 referendum; expressed in federal reforms, voting patterns and opinion polls. The article substantiates the prediction that the sovereignty option in Québec is well and alive, so another referendum on the issue is likely if sovereigntist organizations manage to refine their message and the federal government shows inflexibility in accommodating the Francophone province’s claims for recognition and respect for its autonomy.

Keywords

Canadian politics Québec sovereignty Independence movement Separation referendum 

References

  1. Bleiberg J (2015) Québec separatism isn’t dead — but it’s fighting for relevance. Vice News. September 24Google Scholar
  2. Boisvert Y (2015) Hard questions for Duceppe, and the Bloc Québécois. The Globe and Mail, June 11Google Scholar
  3. Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat. “Conferences.” Available online. http://www.scics.gc.ca/english/conferences.asp?x=1
  4. CBC News (2011) Layton stirs controversy with referendum comments. CBC News Montreal, May 26. Available online http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/layton-stirs-controversy-with-referendum-comments-1.1008593
  5. Changefoot N, Cullen B (2011) Why is Québec separatism off the agenda? Reducing the national unity crisis in the neoliberal era. Can J Polit Sci 44(4):769–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Den Tandt M (2014) Call in the undertaker, Québec sovereignty is dead. National Post, April 4.Google Scholar
  7. Dion S (1999) Straight Talk: On Canadian Unity. McGill-Queen’s University Press, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  8. Dion S (2015) The Canadian distinctiveness regarding referendums: the experience of federal and self-determination referendums. In: Notes for an address to the conference Referendum Democracy in Plurinational States, Université Laval, Québec City, October 29Google Scholar
  9. Direction générale des élections du Québec (A) “Référendums au Québec”, available online https://www.electionsquebec.qc.ca/francais/provincial/resultats-electoraux/referendums.php
  10. Direction générale des élections du Québec (B) “Élection générales”. Available online https://www.electionsquebec.qc.ca/francais/provincial/resultats-electoraux/elections-generales.php
  11. Elections Canada. “Past Elections.” Available online http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=ele&dir=pas&document=index&lang=e
  12. Jeffery B (2015) Abandoning Québec: The National-Unity Agenda. In: Dismantling Canada. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal, pp 303–323Google Scholar
  13. Kymlicka W, Raviot J-R (1997) Living together: international aspects of federal systems. Can Foreign Policy 5(1), Fall: 1–49Google Scholar
  14. Léger. “Publications.” Available online. http://leger360.com/fr-ca/ressources
  15. Ministère des Relations internationales et de la Francophonie. “Québec-Canada agreement on UNESCO.” Available online. http://www.mrif.gouv.qc.ca/fr/relations-du-quebec/organisations-et-forums/representation-unesco/accord-unesco
  16. National Post Staff (2012) Angelo Persichilli resigns as Stephen Harper’s communications director. National Post. March 30. Available online. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/angelo-persichilli-resigns-as-stephen-harpers-communications-director
  17. Parliament of Canada (2008) Speech from the Throne to open the First Session Fortieth Parliament of Canada. November 18. Available online. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2008/gg/SO1-1-2008E.pdf
  18. Parliament of Canada (A). “Electoral Results By Province or Territory.” Available online http://www.parl.gc.ca/parlinfo/compilations/electionsandridings/ResultsProvince.aspx
  19. Patriquin M, Wells P (2014) The Epic Collapse of Québec Separatism. Maclean’s. April 11Google Scholar
  20. Pelletier R (2014) Les relations fédérales-provinciales sous le gouvernment Harper: de l’ouverture à l’unilatéralisme. In: Castro-Rea J, Boily F (eds) Le fédéralisme selon Harper : la place du Québec dans le Canada conservateur. Les Presses de l’Université Laval, Ste. FoyGoogle Scholar
  21. Perreaux L (2015) Québec sovereignty movement has faltered without Jacques Parizeau. The Globe and Mail. June 2Google Scholar
  22. Radio-Canada Staff (2017) Québec Solidaire et Option Nationale unissent leurs destinées. Available online https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1059784/fusion-partis-souverainete-quebec-solidaire-option-nationale
  23. Rocher F (2014) Self-determination and the use of referendums: the case of Québec. Int J Polit Cult Soc 27(1):25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor C (1992) Multiculturalism and ‘the politics of recognition’: an essay. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  25. Vongdouangchanh B (2015) Remembering the Québec referendum, 20 years later. The Hill Times, October 30Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations