Advertisement

Federalism and Democratic Quality: The Contribution of Territorial Pluralism to Constitutional Democracy

  • Francisco Balaguer CallejónEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This paper has analysed how federalism or territorial pluralism can contribute to increase the quality of democracy and the freedom of the citizenry by favouring political pluralism and the control of power. Political pluralism and territorial pluralism are based on two different logics. Political pluralism indicates the moment of diversity, in which the alternatives that reflect the confrontation of interests and values inherent to all democratic societies are expressed and channelled. Territorial pluralism, in contrast, represents the moment of unity via the defence of the interests of the territory that are claimed against higher instances (the European Union for the Member States, the States for the territorial bodies). At present we can talk about a structural weakness of political pluralism at a European level, and the weakness of territorial pluralism at the infra-state level, which are nothing more than a manifestation of the same phenomenon: the strength and centrality of the State, which is projected in European politics in defence of national interests and reduces the impact of territorial interests in national politics. Rebalancing the excessive presence of the State at European and territorial level requires a revitalisation of internal territorial pluralism and the strengthening of political pluralism in the still incipient European public space.

However, despite the fact that the excessive prominence of the national State continues to distort a balanced relationship between territorial pluralism and political pluralism at the various levels of government, the existence of this diversity of spaces or levels is an extremely positive factor from the point of view of the control of power and the quality of democracy. The explanation of this effect can be found in the fact that the tension between territorial pluralism and political pluralism operates differently when transferred to a distinct public space. In this way, the territorial pluralism of the infra-state level could favour political pluralism at a supranational level by incorporating voices distinct to those of the Member states, (which tend to monopolise the European decision-making process) into the public debate. In the same vein, the opening up of supranational regulatory processes to the internal territorial level of States could contribute to the strengthening of internal territorial pluralism at state level.

Keywords

Political pluralism Territorial pluralism Supranational integration Federalism Democracy 

References

  1. Balaguer Callejón F (2008) El Tratado de Lisboa en el Diván. Una reflexión sobre constitucionalidad, estatalidad y Unión Europea. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional núm. 83, mayo-agostoGoogle Scholar
  2. Balaguer Callejón F (2010) A divisão territorial do poder num contexto supranacional. O exemplo da Espanha na União Europeia. In: Tavares AR, Sarlet IW, Leite GS (eds) Estado Constitucional e Organização do Poder. Editora Saraiva, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  3. Balaguer Callejón F (2011) Diritto e giustizia nell’ordinamento costituzionale europeo. In: Cantaro A (ed) Giustizia e diritto nella scienza giuridica contemporanea. G. Giappichelli Editore, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  4. Balaguer Callejón F (2012a) El final de una época dorada. Una reflexión sobre la crisis económica y el declive del Derecho constitucional nacional. In: Estudos em Homenagem ao Professor Doutor José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho (ed) Constituição e Estado: entre Teoria e Dogmática, vol II. Coimbra Editora, Coimbra, pp 99–122Google Scholar
  5. Balaguer Callejón F (2012b) Crisi economica e crisi costituzionale in Europa. In: Costituzione, globalizzazione e tradizione giuridica europea, a cura de Biagio Andò e Fausto Vecchio. CEDAM, Padova, pp 333–352. also published in KorEuropa núm. 1/2012Google Scholar
  6. Balaguer Callejón F (2012c) La crisi costituzionale in Europa. In: The European Crisis. Interpretations and Answers, a cura di Stelio Mangiameli. Giuffrè editore, Milano, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  7. Balaguer Callejón F (2013a) Crise économique et crise constitutionnelle en Europe. Constitutions, avril-juin 2013Google Scholar
  8. Balaguer Callejón F (2013b) Crisis económica y crisis constitucional en Europa. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional núm. 98, mayo-agosto de 2013Google Scholar
  9. Balaguer Callejón F (2013c) Division of powers, distribution of competences, and configuration of public spheres in the autonomous state integrated in Europe. In: Basaguren AL, Epifanio LES (eds) The ways of federalism and the horizons of the Spanish state of autonomies. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Balaguer Callejón F (2013d) European identity, citizenship and the model of integration. In: Citizenship and solidarity in the European Union: from the charter of fundamental rights to the crisis, the state of the art. PIE Peter Lang SA. Éditions scientifiques internationales, Bruxelles, pp 311–323. also published in Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Bd. 62, 2014Google Scholar
  11. Balaguer Callejón F (2014) Autonomia finanziaria e pluralismo territoriale in Spagna nel contesto della crisi economica. In: Il federalismo fiscale in Europaa cura di Silvio Gambino. Dott. A. Giuffrè Editore, Milano, pp 73–111Google Scholar
  12. Lanchester F (2012) La integración europea y la herencia del federalismo alemán. ReDCE núm. 17, Enero-Junio. http://www.ugr.es/~redce/REDCE17/articulos/13_LANCHESTER.htm
  13. Ridola P (2005) La parlamentarización de las estructuras institucionales de la Unión Europea entre democracia representativa y democracia participativa. ReDCE núm. 3, Enero-Junio. http://www.ugr.es/~redce/ReDCE3/02paoloridola.htm

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations