Advertisement

Reasons for and Limits of the Referendum as a Mechanism to Declare the Secession of Part of a State

  • Francisco M. García CostaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this article I will analyze the use of the referendum in the processes of secession of part of a State. In the first chapter, in terms of general theory, I will explore the reasons for and limits of the use of the referendum in the processes of independence of part of a State or disappearance of a State because of the secession of a part of its territory. In that regard, I consider that the referendum is a necessary instrument to declare such a secession, but never enough, insofar as the independence of part of a State cannot be declared solely by means of a referendum. Several arguments support the need, given that this is essential, for a process in which Parliaments and citizens participate in a referendum. In my opinion, the Spanish Constitution of 1978 contains appropriate regulations for the secession of part of a State in which the use of the referendum fulfils all the democratic requirements. This is why the second and third chapters of this work focus on the examination of the constitutional Spanish regulation that, on the one hand, appears as a model contrary to the secession as consequence of a simple referendum and in which, on the other hand, the referendum is one of the phases of a longer process for the declaration of the secession.

Keywords

Constitutional law Spanish Constitution of 1978 Amendment Power to review 

References

  1. Aláez Corral B (2000) Los límites materiales a la reforma de la Constitución española de 1978. CEPC, Madrid, Spain, 433 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. Archive for the History of Economic ThoughtGoogle Scholar
  3. De Vega García P (1985) La reforma constitucional y la problemática del Poder constituyente. Tecnos, Madrid, Spain, 309 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Garrorena Morales A (2011) Derecho constitucional. Teoría de la Constitución y sistema de fuentes. CEPC, Madrid, Spain, 253 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Jellinek G (2000) Teoría General del Estado. Comares, Granada, Spain, 788 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Kelsen H (1979) Teoría General del Estado. Editora Nacional, Mexico D.F., Mexico, 709 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Ridao J (2014) El dret a decidir: la consulta sobre el futur politic de Catalunya. Institut d’Estudis Autonòmics, Barcelone, Spain, 325 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Rubio Llorente F (2009) Rigidez y apertura en la Constitución. In: VV.AA. La reforma constitucional. ¿Hacia un nuevo proceso constituyente? Actas de las XIV Jornadas de la Asociación de Letrados del Tribunal Constitucional. CEPC, Madrid, Spain, pp 14–37Google Scholar
  9. Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional 31/2010, 28 June. F.J. 12Google Scholar
  10. Standing Orders of the Congress, 10 February 1982Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Murcia, Faculty of LawMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations