NETYS 2017: Networked Systems pp 69-85 | Cite as

Convergence of Even Simpler Robots without Position Information

  • Debasish Pattanayak
  • Kaushik Mondal
  • Partha Sarathi Mandal
  • Stefan Schmid
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10299)

Abstract

The design of distributed gathering and convergence algorithms for tiny robots has recently received much attention. In particular, it has been shown that the convergence problem, that is, the problem of moving robots close to each other (i.e., inside an area of some maximum size, where the position of the area is not fixed beforehand), can even be solved for very weak, oblivious robots: robots which cannot maintain state from one round to the next. The oblivious robot model is hence attractive from a self-stabilization perspective, where the state is subject to adversarial manipulation. However, to the best of our knowledge, all existing robot convergence protocols rely on the assumption that robots, despite being “weak”, can measure distances.

We in this paper initiate the study of convergence protocols for even simpler robots, called monoculus robots: robots which cannot measure distances. In particular, we introduce two natural models which relax the assumptions on the robots’ cognitive capabilities: (1) a Locality Detection (\(\mathscr {LD}\)) model in which a robot can only detect whether another robot is closer than a given constant distance or not, (2) an Orthogonal Line Agreement (\(\mathscr {OLA}\)) model in which robots only agree on a pair of orthogonal lines (say North-South and West-East, but without knowing which is which).

The problem turns out to be non-trivial, as simple strategies like median and angle bisection can easily increase the distances among robots (e.g., the area of the enclosing convex hull) over time. Our main contribution is deterministic self-stabilizing convergence algorithms for these two models. We also show that in some sense, the assumptions made in our models are minimal: by relaxing the assumptions on the monoculus robots further, we run into impossibility results.

Keywords

Convergence Weak robots Oblivious mobile robots Asynchronous Distributed algorithm 

References

  1. 1.
    Cohen, R., Peleg, D.: Convergence properties of the gravitational algorithm in asynchronous robot systems. SIAM J. Comput. 34(6), 1516–1528 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, R., Peleg, D.: Convergence of autonomous mobile robots with inaccurate sensors and movements. SIAM J. Comput. 38(1), 276–302 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wolfram Mathematica Documentation: BoxWhiskerChart (2010). http://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/BoxWhiskerChart.html
  4. 4.
    Dolev, S.: Self-stabilization. MIT press, Cambridge (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flocchini, P., Prencipe, G., Santoro, N., Widmayer, P.: Distributed coordination of a set of autonomous mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 480–485 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flocchini, P., Prencipe, G., Santoro, N., Widmayer, P.: Hard tasks for weak robots: the role of common knowledge in pattern formation by autonomous mobile robots. ISAAC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1741, pp. 93–102. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). doi: 10.1007/3-540-46632-0_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flocchini, P., Prencipe, G., Santoro, N., Widmayer, P.: Gathering of asynchronous robots with limited visibility. Theor. Comput. Sci. 337(1–3), 147–168 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gilbert, S., Lynch, N., Mitra, S., Nolte, T.: Self-stabilizing robot formations over unreliable networks. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 4(3), 17:1–17:29 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Izumi, T., Souissi, S., Katayama, Y., Inuzuka, N., Défago, X., Wada, K., Yamashita, M.: The gathering problem for two oblivious robots with unreliable compasses. SIAM J. Comput. 41(1), 26–46 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prencipe, G.: Impossibility of gathering by a set of autonomous mobile robots. Theor. Comput. Sci. 384(2–3), 222–231 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Souissi, S., Défago, X., Yamashita, M.: Using eventually consistent compasses to gather memory-less mobile robots with limited visibility. TAAS 4(1), 9:1–9:27 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sugihara, K., Suzuki, I.: Distributed algorithms for formation of geometric patterns with many mobile robots. J. Rob. Syst. 13(3), 127–139 (1996)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suzuki, I., Yamashita, M.: Distributed anonymous mobile robots: formation of geometric patterns. SIAM J. Comput. 28(4), 1347–1363 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debasish Pattanayak
    • 1
  • Kaushik Mondal
    • 1
  • Partha Sarathi Mandal
    • 1
  • Stefan Schmid
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  3. 3.TU BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations