Improved Performance of Materials pp 197-206 | Cite as
Computational Evaluation of Transverse Thermal Conductivity of Natural Fiber Composites
Abstract
The finite element analysis is used to investigate the sensitivity of the effective transverse thermal conductivity of polymeric composites reinforced with Manila hemp fibers in terms of their degree of saturation. It is predicted that the hierarchical structure of the fiber bundle will highly magnify the rate of water absorption and in consequence, the effective transverse thermal conductivity of the composite is altered. This influence is quantized in terms of the volume fraction of the fiber bundle and the lumen to produce a homogenized representative continuum. It was found that increasing the fiber volume fraction in a dry medium results in a decrease in the thermal conductivity whereas an increase of conductivity will be evident in a wet condition. Furthermore, the increase in the volume fraction of the lumen enhances the thermal conductivity by retaining more water during saturation which supports the developed hypothesis.
Keywords
Thermal conductivity Finite element method User subroutine Water content MoistureReferences
- 1.Assarar M, Scida D, El Mahi A, Poilâne C, Ayad R (2011) Influence of water ageing on mechanical properties and damage events of two reinforced composite materials: flax–fibres and glass–fibres. Mater Des 32(2):788–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Athijayamani A, Thiruchitrambalam M, Natarajan U, Pazhanivel B (2009) Effect of moisture absorption on the mechanical properties of randomly oriented natural fibers/polyester hybrid composite. Mater Sci Eng, A 517(1–2):344–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Behzad T, Sain M (2007) Measurement and prediction of thermal conductivity for hemp fiber reinforced composites. Polym Eng Sci 47(7):977–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Célino A, Freour S, Jacquemin F, Casari P (2014) The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: a review. Front Chem 1:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Chow CPL, Xing XS, Li RKY (2007) Moisture absorption studies of sisal fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol 67(2):306–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Dhakal H, Zhang Z, Richardson M (2007) Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol 67(7–8):1674–1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 37(11):1552–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fiedler T, Hosseini S, Belova IV, Murch GE, Öchsner A (2009) A refined finite element analysis on the thermal conductivity of perforated hollow sphere structures. Comput Mater Sci 47(2):314–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Islam MR, Pramila A (1999) Thermal conductivity of fiber reinforced composites by the fem. J Compos Mater 33(18):1699–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Javanbakht Z, Öchsner A (2017) Advanced finite element simulation with MSC Marc: application of user subroutines. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Javanbakht Z, Hall W, Öchsner A (2016a) Automatized estimation of the effective thermal conductivity of carbon fiber reinforced composite materials. Defect Diffus Forum 370:177–183Google Scholar
- 12.Javanbakht Z, Hall W, Öchsner A (2016b) Finite element evaluation of effective thermal conductivity of short carbon nano tubes: a comparative study. Defect Diffus Forum 372:208–214Google Scholar
- 13.Kalaprasad G, Pradeep P, Mathew G, Pavithran C, Thomas S (2000) Thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity analyses of low-density polyethylene composites reinforced with sisal, glass and intimately mixed sisal/glass fibres. Compos Sci Technol 60(16):2967–2977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Li X, Tabil LG, Oguocha IN, Panigrahi S (2008) Thermal diffusivity, thermal conductivity, and specific heat of flax fiber–hdpe biocomposites at processing temperatures. Compos Sci Technol 68(7–8):1753–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Liu K, Takagi H, Yang Z (2011) Evaluation of transverse thermal conductivity of manila hemp fiber in solid region using theoretical method and finite element method. Mater Des 32(8–9):4586–4589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Liu K, Takagi H, Osugi R, Yang Z (2012) Effect of lumen size on the effective transverse thermal conductivity of unidirectional natural fiber composites. Compos Sci Technol 72(5):633–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Mangal R, Saxena NS, Sreekala MS, Thomas S, Singh K (2003) Thermal properties of pineapple leaf fiber reinforced composites. Mater Sci Eng, A 339(1–2):281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Öchsner A (2016) Computational statics and dynamics: an introduction based on the finite element method. Springer, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Öchsner A, Merkel M (2013) One-dimensional finite elements: an introduction to the FE method. Springer, Berlin and HeidelbergCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 20.Placet V (2009) Characterization of the thermo-mechanical behaviour of hemp fibres intended for the manufacturing of high performance composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 40(8):1111–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Rakovsky SK (2014) Analytical tools and industrial applications for chemical processes and polymeric materials. Apple Academic Press, Point PleasantGoogle Scholar
- 22.Rauwendaal C (2014) Polymer extrusion, 5th edn. Hanser Publications and Hanser Publication, Munich and CincinnatiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Schirp A, Wolcott MP (2007) Influence of fungal decay and moisture absorption on mechanical properties of extruded wood-plastic composites. Wood Fiber Sci 37(4):643–652Google Scholar
- 24.Shah DU, Bock MCD, Mulligan H, Ramage MH (2016) Thermal conductivity of engineered bamboo composites. J Mater Sci 51(6):2991–3002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Singh RP, Heldman DR (2014) Introduction to food engineering, 5th edn. Food science and technology international series. Elsevier Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wang H, Xiao Y, Qin QH (2016) 2D hierarchical heat transfer computational model of natural fiber bundle reinforced composite. Scientia Iranica Trans B, Mech Eng 23(1):268Google Scholar