Advertisement

Following Nature’s Lead

  • Domenica Devine
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Leadership and Followership book series (PASTLEFO)

Abstract

Research into the shared leadership paradigm has been rich and varied. This chapter contributes to those conversations using the underlying concept of deep ecology and the science of ecosystems. Using the metaphors of ecological systems, the chapter explores patterns linking concepts of ecological systems and organizational systems together, questioning how shared leadership is reflected in the metaphors. This chapter focuses on four ecological principles: interconnectedness, porous boundaries, stability, and synergy. First, both biology and social systems exhibit intricate webs with both linear and non-linear pathways of connectivity. Second, both systems have diffuse boundaries, which allows for interconnections and for the movement of materials, energy, and organisms. Third, both healthy ecological and social systems tend to flow toward stability, a dynamic property supported by the foundations of resilience and resistance. Fourth, both systems rely on synergy as a means to success. Finally, I note that change is the thread that runs through them all. By looking at these ecological and organizational systems in parallel provides an opportunity to find new ways of thinking about the shared leadership paradigm that can provide practical as well as theoretical insight.

Keywords

Leadership Ecosystem Synergy Stability Open systems 

References

  1. Allen, K. E., Stelzner, S. P., & Wielkiewicz, R. M. (1998). The ecology of leadership: Adapting to the challenges of a changing world. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(2), 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, S. D., & Martiny, J. B. H. (2008). Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(Suppl. 1), 11512–11519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alznauer, M. (2015). Leading naturally: The evolutionary source code of leadership. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Ames, D. (2016, October 14). Whole Foods executive offers advice to Cal Poly students. The Tribune, p. 3A.Google Scholar
  5. Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Benyus, J. (2014). Conversation with Janine. Retrieved from http://biomimicry.net/about/biomimicry/conversation-with-janine/
  8. Boonstra, D. (2014). Hunting: Self-organization or leadership (Master’s thesis). Utrecht University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P. M., & Ellwart, T. (2011). Coordination in human and primate groups. Berlin, Germany/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems (1st ed.). New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  11. Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapin, F. S., & Whiteman, G. (1998). Sustainable development of the boreal forest: Interaction of ecological, social, and business feedbacks. Conservation Ecology. Retrieved from http://www.consecol.org/vol2/iss2/art12/
  13. Colarelli, S. M., & Arvey, R. D. (2015). The biological foundations of organizational behavior. Chicago/London, UK: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cole, K. C. (1985). Sympathetic vibrations: Reflections on physics as a way of life (1st ed.). New York: W. Morrow.Google Scholar
  15. Corning, P. A. (2003). Nature’s magic: Synergy in evolution and the fate of humankind. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Fine Licht, H. H., Boomsma, J. J., & Tunlid, A. (2014). Symbiotic adaptations in the fungal cultivar of leaf-cutting ants. Nature Communications, 5, 5675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunne, J., Williams, R. J., & Martinez, N. D. (2002). Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: Robustness increases with connectance. Ecology Letters, 5, 558–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frauenheim, E. (2016, May 16). Why Nike’s diversity disclosure is just the first step. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/05/16/nike-diversity-transparency/
  20. Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ho, M. W., & Ulanowicz, R. (2005). Sustainable systems as organisms? Biosystems, 82(1), 39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2005.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. How will an on-demand economy work? (2016). As Uber, Airbnb, and others grow, answering questions about employment and benefits becomes urgent. Newswise. Retrieved from http://www.newswise.com/articles/how-will-an-on-demand-economy-work
  23. Hunt, V., Layton, D., & Prince, S. (2015). Why diversity matters. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/why-diversity-matters
  24. King, A. J., Johnson, D. D. P., & Van Vugt, M. (2009). The origins and evolution of leadership. Current Biology, 19, R911–R916. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krall, F. R. (1994). Ecotone: Wayfaring on the margins. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  26. Küpers, W. (2007). Perspectives on integrating leadership and followership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(3), 3–30.Google Scholar
  27. Laszlo, A. (2008). Evolutionary ethics: Vision and values for a world of insurmountable opportunities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, Mexico.Google Scholar
  28. Laszlo, A. (2009). The nature of evolution. World Futures, 65, 204–221. doi: 10.1080/02604020802392112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laszlo, A. (2015). Living systems, seeing systems, being systems: Learning to be the system that we wish to see in the world. Spanda Journal, VI(1), 165–173.Google Scholar
  30. Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. (1991). Microcosmos: Four billion years of evolution from our microbial ancestors (1st Touchstone Ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  31. Næss, A. (2005). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. In A. Drengson (Ed.), The selected works of Arne Næss (pp. 2263–2269). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Oliver-Lalana, A. D. (2001). What I tell you three times is true: A pragmatic approach to redundancy in legal information. International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 15(2), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prigogine, I., Stengers, I., & Prigogine, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Toronto, ON/New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  34. Ren, D., Madsen, J. S., Sorensen, S. J., & Burmolle, M. (2015). High prevalence of biofilm synergy among bacterial soil isolates in cocultures indicates bacterial interspecific cooperation. The ISME Journal, 9(1), 81–89. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rose, S. P. R. (2003). Lifelines: Life beyond the gene. In Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rothman, J. (2016, February 29). Shut up and sit down: Why the leadership industry rules. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/02/29/our-dangerous-leadership-obsession
  37. Scheffer, M., Vergnon, R., van Nes, E. H., Cuppen, J. G. M., Peeters, E. T. H. M., Leijs, R., & Nilsson, A. N. (2015). The evolution of functionally redundant species: Evidence from beetles. PloS One, 10, e0137974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Senge, P. M. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world (1st ed.). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  39. Serres, M. (1995). Genesis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simard, S. W., & Durall, D. M. (2004). Mycorrhizal networks: A review of their extent, function, and importance. Canadian Journal of Botany, 82, 1140–1165. doi: 10.1139/b04-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Slabbekoorn, H., & den Boer-Visser, A. (2006). Cities change the songs of birds. Current Biology, 16, 2326–2331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, J. E., Gavrilets, S., Mulder, M. B., Hooper, P. L., El Mouden, C., Nettle, D., … Smith, E. A. (2016). Leadership in mammalian societies: Emergence, distribution, power, and payoff. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(1), 54–66.Google Scholar
  43. Suzuki, D. T., McKibben, B., & David Suzuki Foundation. (2014). The David Suzuki reader: A lifetime of ideas from a leading activist and thinker (Rev. ed.). Vancouver, BC: Greystone Books.Google Scholar
  44. Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83–104. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 181–198. doi: 10.1037/a0034531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wielkiewicz, R. M., & Stelzner, S. P. (2005). An ecological perspective on leadership theory, research, and practice. Review of General Psychology, 9, 326–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Domenica Devine
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Life SciencesAllan Hancock CollegeSanta MariaUSA

Personalised recommendations