Advertisement

Knowledge Building Conceptualisation within Smart Constructivist Learning Systems

  • Farshad Badie
Chapter
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 70)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the meeting of Constructivism (as a learning theory) and Smart Learning and, thus, theorises Smart Constructivist Learning. The main field of research is Smart Learning Environments. Relying on the phenomena of ‘meaning construction’ and ‘meaningful understanding production’ in the framework of smart constructivism, we will focus on analysing Smart Constructivist Knowledge Building. Accordingly, we will analyse Learning-and-Constructing-Together as a smart constructivist model of learning. The outcomes of this chapter could support the developments of smart learning strategies.

Keywords

Smart learning Constructivism Meaning Understanding Knowledge building Collaborative learning Philosophy of education 

References

  1. 1.
    Chi, M.T.H.: Conceptual Change within and across ontological categories: examples from learning and discovery in science. In: Giere, R.N. (ed.) Cognitive Models of Science, vol. 15, Minnesota studies in the Philosophy of Science, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 129–186 (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Limon, M.: Conceptual Change in history. In: Limon, M., Mason, L. (eds.) Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice, pp. 259–289. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watkins, C., Carnell, E., Lodge, C., Wagner, P., Whalley, C.: Effective Learning, National School Improvement Network (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Badie, F.: Concept representation analysis in the context of human-machine interactions. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on e-Society (pp. 55–62), International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS), Algarve, Portugal (2016a)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Badie, F.: Towards concept understanding relying on conceptualisation in constructivist learning. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, pp. 292–296, International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS), Mannheim, Germany (2016b)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Piaget, J.: Origins of Intelligence in the Child. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1936)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Piaget, J., Cook, M.T.: The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International University Press, New York, NY (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Badie, F.: A conceptual framework for knowledge creation based on constructed meanings within mentor-learner conversations. In: Smart Education and e-Learning 2016, Springer International Publishing. Volume 59 of the series Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, pp. 167–177 (2016c)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Uskov, L.V., Howlett, J.R., Jain, C.L. (ed.) Smart Education and e-Learning 2016. Springer International Publishing (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Uskov, V.L., Bakken, J.P., Pandey, A., Singh, U., Yalamanchili, M., Penumatsa, A.: Smart University Taxonomy: Features, Components, Systems, Smart Education and e-Learning 2016. Springer International Publishing (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Badie, F.: A semantic basis for meaning construction in constructivist interactions. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, pp. 369–376. International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS), Greater Dublin, Ireland (2015a)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Badie, F.: Towards a semantics-based framework for meaning construction in constructivist interactions. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, pp. 7995–8002. International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED), Seville, Spain (2015b)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Badie, F.: Towards semantic analysis of mentoring-learning relationships within constructivist interactions. In: Emerging Technologies for Education. Springer International Publishing. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Proceedings of International Symposium on Emerging Technologies for Education, Rome, Italy (2017a)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    von Foerster, H.: Understanding Understanding. Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition. Springer, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peschl, M.F., Riegler, A.: Does Representation Need Reality? Rethinking Epistemological Issues in the Light of Recent Developments and Concepts in Cognitive Science, Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences. Springer US, pp. 9–17 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Webb, J.: Understanding Representation. SAGE Publications (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaitin, G.J.: Algorithmic Information Theory. Cambridge University Press (1987)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F., Zimny, S.: Sentence memory: a theoretical analysis. J. Memory Lang. Elsevier (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G.: Understanding motor events. a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res 91, 176–180 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    MacKay, D.: Information Theory. Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zwaan, R.A., Taylor, L.J.: Seeing, language comprehension. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 135(1), 1–11 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Uithol, Sebo, van Rooij, Iris, Bekkering, Harold, Haselager, Pim: Understanding motor resonance. Social Neurosci. Routledge 6(4), 388–397 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Uithol, Sebo, Paulus, Markus: What do infants understand of others’ action? A theoretical account of early social cognition. Psychol. Res. 78(5), 609–622 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grosholz, Emily: Herbert Breger. The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge, Springer Science and Business Media (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marzano, R.J.: Building Background Knowledge for Academic Achievement: Research on What Works in Schools, Alexandria, VA 22311-1714 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fisher, D., Frey, N.: Background Knowledge: The Missing Piece of the Comprehension Puzzle, Portsmouth. Heinemann, NH (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Säljö, R.: Learning in the Learner’s Perspective: Some Commonplace Misconceptions. Reports from the Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg (1979)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Rossum, E.J., Schenk, S. M.: The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. Brit. J. Educ. Psychol. (1984)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Van Rossum, E.J., Rebecca, H.: The Meaning of Learning and Knowing, Sense Publishers, The Netherlands (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boyd, G.M.: Conversation Theory. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2nd edn, pp. 179–197. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pask, G.: Developments in Conversation Theory (part 1), Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. Elsevier Publishers (1980)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Laurillard, D.M.: Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. Routledge, London (1993)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Laurillard, D.: Rethinking University Teaching, A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. Routledge, London (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hwang, G.J.: Definition, Framework and Research issues of Smart Learning Environments—A Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning Perspective. Smart Learn. Environ. Springer Open J. 1, 4 (2014)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Spector, J.M.: Smart Learn. Environ. Conceptualizing the Emerging Field of Smart Learning Environments, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pratt, D.D.: Conceptions of Teaching. Adult Educ. Q. 42(4), 203–220 (1992)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hans, Götzsche: Deviational Syntactic Structures. Bloomsbury Academic, London/New Delhi/ New York/ Sydney (2013)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Coccoli, M., Guercio, A., Maresca, P., Stanganelli, L.: Smarter Universities: a vision for the fast changing digital era. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25, 1003–1011 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bates, T., Spector, M., David Merrill, M. (eds.): Special issue: Effective, efficient and engaging (E3) learning in the digital age (2008)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Merrill, M.D.: First Principles of Instruction: Identifying and Designing Effective. Efficient and Engaging Instruction. Wiley, San Francisco, CA (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
    Biggs, John B., Collis, Kevin F.: Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chierchia, G.: Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar. University of Chicago Press (2009)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gabbay, D.M., Guenthner, F.: Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 15. Springer Science & Business Media (2010)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Larsson, S.: Formal Semantics for Perception. Workshop on Language, Action and Perception (APL), Center for Language Technology, Gothenburg, Link: http://clt.gu.se/dialogue-technology-lab/sltc2012-apl (2012)
  46. 46.
    Simpson, J.A., Weiner, E.S.C.: The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press (1989)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company, New York (1956)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Krathwohl David, R.: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview, Theory into Practice. Routledge Publishers (2002)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
  50. 50.
    Badie, F.: A conceptual mirror: towards a reflectional symmetrical relation between mentor and learner. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol.: IJIET 2017 7(3), 199–203. ISSN: 2010-3689 (Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education and Psychological Sciences (in 2016), Florence, Italy (2017b))Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Badie, F.: A semantic representation of adult learners’ developing conceptions of self realisation through learning process. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference, pp. 5348–5353. International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED), Valencia, Spain (2016b)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    von Glasersfeld, E.: A constructivist approach to teaching, in constructivism in education. In: Steffe, L.P., Gale, J., Hillsdale, N.J. (eds.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 3–15 (1995)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wasson, B.: Instructional Planning and contemporary theories of learning: is this a self-contradiction? In: Brna, P., Paiva, A, Self, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 23–30. Colibri, Lisbon (1996)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Fosnot, C.T.: Constructivism: A Psychological Theory of Learning. In: Fosnot, C.T. (ed.) Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives and Practice, pp. 8–33. Teachers College Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Boethel, M., Dimock, K.V.: Constructing Knowledge with Technology, Austin. Southwest Edu ca tional Development Laboratory, Texas (2000)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Fox, R.: Constructivism examined. Oxford Rev. Educ. 27(1), 23–35 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Maclellan, E., Soden, R.: The importance of epistemic cognition in student-centered learning. Instr. Sci. 32, 253–268 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yilmez, K.: Constructivism: its theoretical underpinnings, variations, and implications for classroom instruction. Educ. Horizons 83(3), 161–172 (2008)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Caswell, B., Bielaczyc, K.: Knowledge forum: altering the relationship between students and scientific knowledge. Educ. Commun. Inf. 1, 281–305 (2001)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Popper, K.R.: Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1972)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Järvelä, S. (eds.): Affective Learning Together: Social and Emotional Dimensions of Collaborative Learning. Routledge, London (2013)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Lamon, M.: The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In: McGilley, K. (ed.) Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, pp. 201–228. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1994)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M.: Theory building and the pursuit of understanding in history, social studies, and literature. In: Kirby, J.R., Lawson, M.J. (eds.) Enhancing the Quality of Learning: Dispositions, Instruction, and Learning Processes, pp. 160–177. Cambridge University Press, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C.: Knowledge building: theory, pedagogy, and technology. In: Sawyer, K. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 397–417. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sorensen, E.K.: Networked e-Learning and Collaborative Knowledge Building: Design and Facilitation. Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 4(4), 446–455 (2005)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., Messina, R.: Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. J. Learn. Sci. 18(1), 7–44 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Latour, B., Woolgar, S.: Laboratory life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA (1979)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): 21st Century Learning: Research, Innovation and Policy. OECD, Paris (2008)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bereiter, C.: Principled practical knowledge: not a bridge but a ladder. J. Learn. Sci. 23(1), 4–17 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Adamko, A., Kadek, T., Kosa, M.: Intelligent and adaptive services for a smart campus visions, concepts and applications. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, 5–7 Nov 2014, Vietri sul Mare, Italy. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Vygotsky, Lev S.: Interaction between learning and development. Read. Dev. Child. 23(3), 34–41 (1978)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes (1978)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vvol. 1: Problems of General Psychology (trans: Minick, N.). Plenum, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Scardamalia, M.: CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In: Kovalchick, A., Dawson, K. (eds.) Education and technology: An Encyclopedia, pp. 183–192. Santa Barbara, ABC-CLIO (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Linguistics, Department of CommunicationAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations