Semi-automatic Methods in Video Forgery Detection Based on Multi-view Dimension

  • Omar Ismael Al-Sanjary
  • Nurulhuda Ghazali
  • Ahmed Abdullah Ahmed
  • Ghazali Sulong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 5)

Abstract

The availability of powerful editing software sophisticated digital cameras, and region duplication is becoming more and more popular in video manipulation where parts of video frames is pasted to another location to conceal undesirable objects. Most existing techniques to detect such tampering are mainly at the cost of higher computational complexity. Multi-view video contains locating a moving object (or multiple objects) over time and several frames representing different views of the same scene of the true width and height of an object in the front view are placed in the sequences of frames plane. In this paper, a new technique for video forgery detection using semi-automatic methods can be used for the three types of video forgery detection: (1) Copy-Move, (2) Splicing, and (3) Swapping-Frames based on a new dimension of multi-view frames. Thus, this idea is proposing new video views based on slices of video frames in Top-View and Side-View in doctored video. Experiment results show that our proposed schemes for new video views enable easy detection of visual inspection is used for the evaluation.

Keywords

Video forgery detection Copy-move Splicing Swapping frames Top-view Side-view 

References

  1. 1.
    Suhail, M.A., Obaidat, M.S.: Digital watermarking-based DCT and JPEG model. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 52, 1640–1647 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Di Martino, F., Sessa, S.: Fragile watermarking tamper detection with images compressed by fuzzy transform. Inf. Sci. 195, 62–90 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ram, S., Bischof, H., Birchbauer, J.: Active fingerprint ridge orientation models. In: International Conference on Biometrics, pp. 534–543. Springer (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boice, C.E., Hall, B.A., Ngai, A.Y., Westermann, E.F.: Method of precise buffer management for MPEG video splicing. Google Patents (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liao, S.-Y., Huang, T.-Q.: Video copy-move forgery detection and localization based on Tamura texture features. In: IEEE 2013 6th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), pp. 864–868. IEEE Press (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al-Sanjary, O.I., Ahmed, A.A., Sulong, G.: Development of a video tampering dataset for forensic investigation. Forensic Sci. Int. 266, 565–572 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bestagini, P., Milani, S., Tagliasacchi, M., Tubaro, S.: Local tampering detection in video sequences. In: 2013 IEEE 15th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), pp. 488–493. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahmood, T., Nawaz, T., Irtaza, A., Ashraf, R., Shah, M., Mahmood, M.T.: Copy-move forgery detection technique for forensic analysis in digital images. Math. Probl. Eng. 2016, 1–13 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsu, C.-C., Hung, T.-Y., Lin, C.-W., Hsu, C.-T.: Video forgery detection using correlation of noise residue. In: 2008 IEEE 10th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pp. 170–174. IEEE Press (2008) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, G.-S., Chang, J.-F., Chuang, C.-H.: Detecting frame duplication based on spatial and temporal analyses. In: 2011 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE), pp. 1396–1399. IEEE Press (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D’Amiano, L., Cozzolino, D., Poggi, G., Verdoliva, L.: Video forgery detection and localization based on 3D patchmatch. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW), pp. 1–6. IEEE Press (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin, C.-S., Tsay, J.-J.: A passive approach for effective detection and localization of region-level video forgery with spatio-temporal coherence analysis. Digit. Invest. 11, 120–140 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kobayashi, M., Okabe, T., Sato, Y.: Detecting forgery from static-scene video based on inconsistency in noise level functions. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 5, 883–892 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parveen, S.S., Palanikkumar, D.: A novel approach for inter frame copy move forgery detection. Int. J. Appl. Inf. Commun. Eng. 1, 60–62 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Subramanyam, A., Emmanuel, S.: Video forgery detection using HOG features and compression properties. In: IEEE 14th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), pp. 89–94. IEEE Press (2012) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Qadir, G., Yahaya, S., Ho, A.T.: Surrey University Library for Forensic Analysis (SULFA) of video content. In: IET Conference on Image Processing (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omar Ismael Al-Sanjary
    • 1
  • Nurulhuda Ghazali
    • 2
  • Ahmed Abdullah Ahmed
    • 3
  • Ghazali Sulong
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Center of Scientific Research and DevelopmentNawroz University - Kurdistan RegionDuhokIraq
  2. 2.Fakulti Sains Komputer dan MatematikUniversiti Teknologi MARAMelakaMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceKurdistan Technical InstituteSulaymaniyah/Kurdistan RegionIraq
  4. 4.Faculty of ComputingUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaSkudaiMalaysia
  5. 5.School of Informatics and Applied MathematicsUniversiti Malaysia TerengganuKuala NerusMalaysia

Personalised recommendations