Glycerol pp 93-103 | Cite as

Glycerol Conversion in the Biorefinery Context

  • Claudio J. A. Mota
  • Bianca Peres Pinto
  • Ana Lúcia de Lima
Chapter

Abstract

This last chapter discusses the opportunities and challenges of converting glycerol into different chemicals, within the biorefinery context. As most of the biodiesel plants in the world are of low to medium capacity, the surplus of glycerol is somewhat spread and available in small quantities in some regions. Therefore, logistic problems, related to the transportation, storage and purification of the glycerol must be taken into account to choose the best opportunity of investment. Specialty and fine chemicals can overcome these problems, because of the high-added value of the final products. Glycerol derivatives that are used as fuel additives may be the best choice for biodiesel producers, as they can be used in the biofuel to improve its properties. In addition, the process conditions and installations are similar to those used in the manufacture of the biodiesel itself. Finally, the use of glycerol as raw material for the production of commodities may be more suitable to traditional chemical companies. They are usually integrated companies, producing the monomers and the polymers to be used in the automotive, textile, painting and other large sectors. In addition, these companies are used to work with processes in continuous flow at high temperatures and pressures.

Keywords

Glycerol Biorefinery Commodities Specialty Fine chemicals 

References

  1. 1.
    Pico MP, Romero A, Rodríguez S, Santos A (2012) Etherification of glycerol by tert-butyl alcohol: kinetic model. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:9500–9509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinto BP, Lyra JT, Nascimento JAC, Mota CJA (2016) Ethers of glycerol and ethanol as bioadditives for biodiesel. Fuel 68:76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wessendorf R (1995) Glycerinderivate als kraftstoffkomponenten. Erdoel Kohle Erdgas Petrochemie 48(3):13Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nanda MR, Yuan Z, Qin W, Ghaziaskar HS, Poirier MR, Xu CC (2014) Catalytic conversion of glycerol to oxygenated fuel additive in a continuous flow reactor: process optimization. Fuel 128:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shirani M, Ghaziaskar HS, Xu CC (2014) Optimization of glycerol ketalization to produce solketal as biodiesel additive in a continuous reactor with subcritical acetone using Purolite® PD206 as catalyst. Fuel Process Technol 124:206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oliveira PA, de Souza ROMA, Mota CJA (2016) Atmospheric pressure continuous production of solketal from the acid-catalyzed reaction of glycerol with acetone. J Braz Chem Soc 6:1832–1837Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mota CJA, da Silva CXA, Rosenbach N Jr, Costa J, da Silva F (2010) Glycerin derivatives as fuel additives: the addition of glycerol/acetone ketal (solketal) in gasolines. Energy Fuel 24:2733–2736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    García E, Laca M, Pérez E, Garrido A, Peinado J (2008) New class of acetal derived from glycerin as a biodiesel fuel component. Energy Fuel 22:4274–4280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ndaba B, Chiyanzu I, Marx S (2015) N-butanol derived from biochemical and chemical routes: a review. Biotechnol Rep 8:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silva PH, Gonçalves VLC, Mota CJA (2010) Glycerol acetals as anti-freezing additives for biodiesel. Bioresour Technol 101:6225–6229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Honda M, Kuno S, Sonehara S, Fujimoto K, Suzuki K, Nakagawa Y, Tomishige K (2011) Tandem carboxylation-hydration reaction system from methanol, CO2 and benzonitrile to dimethyl carbonate and benzamide catalyzed by CeO2. ChemCatChem 3:365–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tomishige K, Kunimori K (2002) Catalytic and direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate starting from carbon dioxide using CeO2-ZrO2 solid solution heterogeneous catalyst: effect of H2O removal from the reaction system. Appl Catal A 237:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eta V, Mäki-Arvela P, Wärna J, Salmi T, Mikkola JP, Murzin D (2011) Kinetics of dimethyl carbonate synthesis from methanol and carbon dioxide over ZrO2–MgO catalyst in the presence of butylene oxide as additive. Appl Catal A 404:39–46Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marciniak A, Mota CJA (2017) Methyl trihaloacetic esters as efficient and sustainable water suppressors in the synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from CO2. Chem Select 2:1808–1811Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu ZC, Zheng YG, Shen YC (2011) Use of glycerol for producing 1,3-dihydroxyacetone by Gluconobacter oxydans in an airlift bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 102:7177–7182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ma L, Lu W, Xia Z, Wen J (2010) Enhancement of dihydroxyacetone production by a mutant of Gluconobacter oxydans. Biochem Eng J 49:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hekmat D, Bauer R, Fricke J (2003) Optimization of the microbial synthesis of dihydroxyacetone from glycerol with Gluconobacter oxydans. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 26:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mota CJA, Gonçalves VLC, Fadigas JC, Gambetta R (2009) Preparation of heterogeneous catalysts used in selective hydrogenation of glycerin to propene, and a process for the selective hydrogenation of glycerin to propene. WO2009155674A1Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mota CJA, Gonçalves VLC, Fadigas JC, Gambetta R (2011) Preparation of heterogeneous catalysts used in selective hydrogenation of glycerin to propene, and a process for the selective hydrogenation of glycerin to propene. US20110184216A1Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mota CJA, Gonçalves VLC, Mellizo JE, Rocco AM, Fadigas JC, Gambetta R (2016) Green propene through the selective hydrogenolysis of glycerol over supported iron-molybdenum catalyst: the original history. J Mol Catal A 422:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilkee T (2014) Methionine production – a critical review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:9893–9914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fremy G, Barre P, Kim S-Y, Son SK, Lee SM (2013) Patent to Arkema France-CJ Cheil Jedang China: preparation process of L-methionine. WO2013/029690(A1)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio J. A. Mota
    • 1
  • Bianca Peres Pinto
    • 2
  • Ana Lúcia de Lima
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Chemistry, School of Chemistry, INCT of Energy and EnvironmentFederal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of ChemistryFederal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations