Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Peter Scholten
  • Ilona van Breugel
Chapter

Abstract

By bringing together unique empirical research on mainstreaming in the UK, Spain, France, the Netherlands, Poland and the EU, and theoretical reflections from various perspectives on the notion of mainstreaming, including gender and disability mainstreaming, migration- and policy literature, this book aims to contribute to the empirical and theoretical understanding of mainstreaming. In the conclusions to this book we reflect on some of the main empirical findings, such as the notion of incomplete mainstreaming, the differences between mainstreaming on the local and national level and the use of proxy policies. Bringing these findings together we reflect on the expectations that were formulated at the beginning of this book on inter alia mainstreaming in a superdiverse context and mainstreaming’s answer to the dilemma of recognition.

References

  1. Aspinall, P.J. 2007. Approaches to Developing an Improved Cross-National Understanding of Concepts and Terms Relating to Ethnicity and Race. International Sociology 22 (1): 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouchard, G. 2011. What is Interculturalism? McGill Law Journal 56 (2): 435–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caglar, G. 2013. Gender Mainstreaming. Politics & Gender 9 (03): 336–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crul, M. 2016. Super-Diversity vs. Assimilation: How Complex Diversity in Majority-Minority Cities Challenges the Assumption of Assimilation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (1): 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Zwart, F. 2005. The Dilemma of Recognition: Administrative Categories and Cultural Diversity. Theory and Society 34 (2): 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lombardo, E., and P. Meier. 2006. Gender Mainstreaming in the EU Incorporating a Feminist Reading? European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (2): 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schneider, A.L., and H. Ingram. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  8. Simon, P., and V. Piché. 2012. Accounting for Ethnic and Racial Diversity: The Challenge of Enumeration. Ethnic and Racial Studies 35 (8): 1357–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vertovec, S. 2007. Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6): 1024–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yanow, D., and M. van der Haar. 2013. People Out of Place: Allochthony and Autochthony in the Netherlands’ Identity Discourse, Metaphors and Categories in Action. Journal of International Relations and Development 16 (2): 227–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zapata-Barrero, R., ed. 2015. Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Scholten
    • 1
  • Ilona van Breugel
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculteit der Sociale WetenschappenErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations