Advertisement

Introduction: Conceptualizing Mainstreaming in Integration Governance

  • Peter Scholten
  • Ilona van Breugel
Chapter

Abstract

This book provides a critical analysis of mainstreaming as one of the major contemporary trends in immigrant integration governance in Europe. Bringing together unique empirical material and theoretical insights on mainstreaming, it examines how, why and to what effect immigrant integration is mainstreamed. Bringing together literature on gender and disability-mainstreaming, migration and policy literature, this chapter defines immigrant integration governance mainstreaming as the generic and inclusive adoption of immigrant integration priorities in generic policy domains, and decentralization and deconcentration of the coordination of integration policy responsibilities. This definition is leading in the analyses throughout the book.

References

  1. Alba, R.D. 2005. Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second-Generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (1): 20–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alba, R.D., and V.G. Nee. 2009. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, M. 2003. Local Policies toward Migrants as an Expression of Host-Stranger Relations: A Proposed Typology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 29 (3): 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aspinall, P.J. 2007. Approaches to Developing an Improved Cross-National Understanding of Concepts and Terms Relating to Ethnicity and Race. International Sociology 22 (1): 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes, C., and G. Mercer. 2005. Disability, Work, and Welfare Challenging the Social Exclusion of Disabled People. Work, Employment & Society 19 (3): 527–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bender, W.N., C.O. Vail, and K. Scott. 1995. Teachers Attitudes toward Increased Mainstreaming Implementing Effective Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities 28 (2): 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth, C., and C. Bennett. 2002. Gender Mainstreaming in the European Union Towards a New Conception and Practice of Equal Opportunities? European Journal of Women’s Studies 9 (4): 430–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouchard, G. 2011. What is Interculturalism? McGill Law Journal 56 (2): 435–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caglar, G. 2013. Gender Mainstreaming. Politics & Gender 9 (03): 336–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cantle, T. 2012. Interculturalism. The New Era of Cohesion and Diversity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caponio, T., and M. Borkert. 2010. Introduction. In The Local Dimension of Migration Policymaking, ed. T. Caponio and M. Borkert, 9–32. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crul, M. 2016. Super-Diversity vs. Assimilation: How Complex Diversity in Majority-Minority Cities Challenges the Assumption of Assimilation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (1): 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crul, M., and J. Schneider. 2010. Comparative Integration Context Theory: Participation and Belonging in New Diverse European Cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies 33 (7): 1249–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crul, M., J. Schneider, and F. Lelie. 2013. Superdiversity. A New Perspective on Integration. Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dalal-Clayton, D.B., and S. Bass. 2009. The Challenges of Environmental Mainstreaming: Experience of Integrating Environment into Development Institutions and Decisions (No. 1). London: IIED.Google Scholar
  16. De Zwart, F. 2005. The Dilemma of Recognition: Administrative Categories and Cultural Diversity. Theory and Society 34 (2): 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2012. Pitfalls of Top-Down Identity Designation: Ethno-Statistics in the Netherlands. Comparative European Politics 10 (3): 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eveline, J., and C. Bacchi. 2005. What are We Mainstreaming When We Mainstream Gender? International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (4): 496–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faist, T. 2009. Diversity—A New Mode of Incorporation? Ethnic and Racial Studies 32 (1): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Favell, A. 1998. Philosophies of Integration: Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in France and Britain. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Favell, A., and M. Martiniello. 1999. Multi-national, Multi-cultural and Multi-levelled Brussels: National and Ethnic Politics in the Capital of Europe. Transnational Communities, Online Working Paper Series. http://www.transcomm.ox.ac.uk/working%20papers/favell.pdf
  22. Freeman, G.P. 2004. Immigrant Incorporation in Western Democracies. International Migration Review 38 (3): 945–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grigolo, M., C. Hermanin, and M. Möschel. 2011. Introduction: How Does Race ‘Count’ in Fighting Discrimination in Europe? Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (10): 1635–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hollinger, D.A. 2000 [1995]. Postethnic America: Beyond Multiculturalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Ingram, H., A.L. Schneider, and P. DeLeon. 2007. Social Construction and Policy Design. Theories of the Policy Process 2: 93–126.Google Scholar
  26. Jeffers, C. 1967. Living Poor: A Participant Observer Study of Priorities and Choices. Ann Harbor: Ann Harbor Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, B.D., and F.R. Baumgartner. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Joppke, C. 2004. The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy. The British Journal of Sociology 55 (2): 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joppke, C., and E. Morawska, eds. 2003. Toward Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Kasinitz, P., J. Mollenkopf, and M.C. Waters. 2002. Becoming American/Becoming New Yorkers: Immigrant Incorporation in a Majority Minority City. International Migration Review 36 (4): 1020–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koopmans, R., and P. Statham. 2000. Migration and Ethnic Relations as a Field of Political Contention: An Opportunity Structure Approach. In Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics: Comparative European Perspective, ed. R. Koopmans and P. Statham, 13–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lombardo, E. 2005. Integrating or Setting the Agenda? Gender Mainstreaming in the European Constitution-Making Process. Social Politics 12 (3): 412–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lombardo, E., and P. Meier. 2006. Gender Mainstreaming in the EU Incorporating a Feminist Reading? European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (2): 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Madden, N.A., and R.E. Slavin. 1983. Mainstreaming Students with Mild Handicaps: Academic and Social Outcomes. Review of Educational Research 53 (4): 519–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marks, G. 1992. Structural Policy in the European Community. In Europolitics. Institutions and Policymaking in the “New” European Community, ed. A. Sbargia, 191–225. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  36. Meer, N., and T. Modood. 2012. How Does Interculturalism Contrast with Multiculturalism? Journal of Intercultural Studies 33 (2): 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meissner, F. 2015. Migration in Migration-Related Diversity? The Nexus between Superdiversity and Migration Studies. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 556–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Niessen, J., and Y. Schibel. 2007. Second Handbook on Integration. For Policy-makers and Practitioners. Italy: European Commission (Directorate General for Justice, Freedom and Security).Google Scholar
  39. Nunan, F., A. Campbell, and E. Foster. 2012. Environmental Mainstreaming: The Organisational Challenges of Policy Integration. Public Administration and Development 32 (3): 262–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Penninx, R., K. Kraal, M. Martiniello, and S. Vertovec. 2004. Introduction: European Cities and Their New Residents. In Citizenship in European Cities. Immigrants, Local Politics and Integration Policies, ed. Rinus Penninx, Karen Kraal, Marco Martiniello, and Stephen Vertovec, 3–17. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Petrovic, M., E. Collet, and P. Scholten. 2012. Mainstreaming Integration (Knowledge Exchange): Scoping Study. Brussels: MPI Europe.Google Scholar
  42. Phillimore, J. 2012. Implementing Integration in the UK: Lessons for Integration Theory, Policy and Practice. Policy & Politics 40 (4): 525–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poppelaars, C., and P. Scholten. 2008. Two Worlds Apart. The Divergence of National and Local Immigrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands. Administration & Society 40 (4): 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Priestley, M., and A. Roulstone. 2009. Targeting and Mainstreaming Disability in the 2008–2010 National Reform Programmes for Growth and Jobs. Academic Network of European Disability Experts, University of Leeds: 4–5.Google Scholar
  45. Rath, J. 1991. Minorisering, de sociale constructie van “etnische minderheden”. Amsterdam: SUA.Google Scholar
  46. Rhodes, R.A. 1997. From Marketization to Diplomacy: It’s the Mix that Matters. Public Policy and Administration 12 (2): 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rogers-Dillon, R. 1995. The Dynamics of Welfare Stigma. Qualitative Sociology 18 (4): 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sabbagh, D. 2011. The Paradox of De-categorization: De-institutionalizing Race Through Race-Based Affirmative Action in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (10): 1665–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schneider, A.L., and H. Ingram. 1993. Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy. The American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ———. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  51. Scholten, P. 2012. Beyond National Models of Integration? Rethinking Interconnectedness and Fragmentation in Dutch and French Integration Policies. In Beyond Fragmentation and Interconnectedness, ed. H.J.M. Fenger and V.J.J.M. Bekker, 44–58. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2013. Agenda Dynamics and the Multi-level Governance of Intractable Policy Controversies: The Case of Migrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences 46 (3): 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scholten, P., E. Collett and M. Petrovic. 2016. Mainstreaming Migrant Integration? A Critical Analysis of a New Trend in Integration Governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences. doi: 10.1177/0020852315612902.
  54. Semmel, M.I., J. Gottlieb, and N.M. Robinson. 1979. Mainstreaming: Perspectives on Educating Handicapped Children in the Public School. Review of Research in Education 7: 223–279.Google Scholar
  55. Sen, A. 1995. The Political Economy of Targeting. In Public Spending and The Poor, ed. D. van de Walle and K. Neads, 11–24. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Simon, P. 1998. Ghettos, Immigrants, and Integration the French Dilemma. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 13 (1): 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ———. 2005. The Measurement of Racial Discrimination: The Policy Use of Statistics. International Social Science Journal 57 (183): 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. ———. 2012. Collecting Ethnic Statistics in Europe: A Review. Ethnic and Racial Studies 35 (8): 1366–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simon, P., and V. Piché. 2012. Accounting for Ethnic and Racial Diversity: The Challenge of Enumeration. Ethnic and Racial Studies 35 (8): 1357–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stratigaki, M. 2005. Gender Mainstreaming vs Positive Action: An Ongoing Conflict in EU Gender Equality Policy. European Journal of Women’s Studies 12 (2): 65–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. United Nations. 1997. Report of the Economic and Social Council for 1997. A/52/3.18. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/docs/52/plenary/a52-3.htm
  62. Van Breugel, I., and P. Scholten. 2017. Mainstreaming in Response to Superdiversity? The Governance of Migration-Related Diversity in France, the UK and the Netherlands. Policy & Politics. doi: 10.1332/030557317X14849132401769.
  63. Verloo, M. 2005. Displacement and Empowerment: Reflections on the Concept and Practice of the Council of Europe Approach to Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12 (3): 344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vertovec, S. 2007. Super-diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6): 1024–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vertovec, S., and S. Wessendorf. 2010. Introduction: Assessing the Backlash Against Multiculturalism in Europe. In The Multiculturalism Backlash; European Discourses, Policies and Practices, ed. S. Vertovec and S. Wessendorf, 1–31. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Walby, S. 2005. Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12 (3): 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson, W.J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  68. Wood, P. 2009. Intercultural Cities: Towards a Model for Intercultural Integration. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  69. Yanow, D., and M. van der Haar. 2013. People out of Place: Allochthony and Autochthony in the Netherlands’ Identity Discourse, Metaphors and Categories in Action. Journal of International Relations and Development 16 (2): 227–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zapata-Barrero, R. 2013. The Three Strands of Intercultural Policies: A Comprehensive View; A Critical Review of Bouchard and Cantle Recent Books on Interculturalism. GRITIM Working Paper Series, No. 17, Summer 2013.Google Scholar
  71. ———., ed. 2015. Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Scholten
    • 1
  • Ilona van Breugel
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculteit der Sociale WetenschappenErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations