Levels of Trace Data for Social and Behavioural Science Research
The explosion of data available from online systems such as social media is creating a wealth of trace data, that is, data that record evidence of human activity. The volume of data available offers great potential to advance social and behavioural science research. However, the data are of a very different kind than more conventional social and behavioural science data, posing challenges to use. This paper adopts a data framework from Earth observation science and applies it to trace data to identify possible issues in analysing trace data. Application of the framework also reveals issues for sharing and reusing data.
KeywordsData design Data capture Secondary data analysis Behavioral data Human data
- Crowston, K., Wei, K., Li, Q., Howison, J. (2006). Core and periphery in free/libre and open source software team communications. In Proceedings of Hawai’i International Conference on System System (HICSS-39). Kaua’i.Google Scholar
- Crowston, K., Wiggins, A., Howison, J. (2010). Analyzing leadership dynamics in distributed group communication. In Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-43). Lihue. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.62.
- Edwards, A., Housley, W., Williams, M., Sloan, L., & Williams, M. (2013). Digital social research, social media and the sociological imagination: Surrogacy, augmentation and re-orientation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13645579.2013.774185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hemphill, L., & Roback, A. J. (2014). Tweet acts: How constituents lobby congress via Twitter. In Proceedings of ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1200–1210). Baltimore.Google Scholar
- Howison, J., Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). Validity issues in the use of social network analysis for the study of online communities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 323–346.Google Scholar
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A. L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721–723. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McClelland, C. A. (1967). Event interaction analysis in the setting of quantitative international relations research. Los Angeles: Department of Political Science, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
- Panciera, K., Priedhorsky, R., Erickson, T., Terveen, L. (2010). Lurking? Cyclopaths? A quantitative lifecyle analysis of user behavior in a geowiki. In Proceedings of ACM conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI). Atlanta.Google Scholar
- Parkinson, C. L., Ward, A., & King, M. D. (Eds.). (2006). Earth science reference handbook: A guide to NASA’s earth science program and earth observing satellite missions. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Available from: http://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/2006ReferenceHandbook.pdf.Google Scholar
- Veen, T. (2008). Event data: A method for analysing political behaviour in the EU. In Proceedings of prepared for the fourth Pan-European conference on EU Politics, Riga, Latvia. Available from: http://www.jhubc.it/ecpr-riga/virtualpaperroom/002.pdf.