Empathic Avatars in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Co-designed mHealth Artifact for Stroke Survivors

  • Hussain M. Aljaroodi
  • Marc T. P. Adam
  • Raymond Chiong
  • David J. Cornforth
  • Mario Minichiello
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10243)

Abstract

Stroke is the second highest cause of death and disability worldwide. While rehabilitation programs are intended to support stroke survivors, and promote recovery after they leave the hospital, current rehabilitation programs typically provide only static written instructions and lack the ability to keep them engaged with the program. In this design science research paper, we present an mHealth artifact that builds on behavior change theory to increase stroke survivors’ engagement in rehabilitation programs. We employed a co-design methodology to identify design requirements for the stroke rehabilitation mHealth artifact, addressing stroke survivors’ needs and incorporating expertise of healthcare providers. Guided by these requirements, we developed design principles for the artifact pertaining to visual assets that are essential in immersing users in the design. We carried out a two-stage development process by having workshops and interviews with experts. Following this, a prototype was developed and evaluated in a series of workshops with multiple stakeholders.

Keywords

Co-design Empathic avatars mHealth Stroke rehabilitation 

References

  1. 1.
    WHF: Stroke. World Heart Federation (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    RACGP: Smoking, Nutrition, Alcohol and Physical Activity (SNAP): A Population Health Guide to Behavioural Risk Factors in General Practice. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP), Melbourne (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jelinek, H.F., August, K., Khandoker, A., Issam, H.M., Koenig, A., Riener, R.: Heart rate asymmetry and emotional response to robot-assist task challenges in post-stroke. In: Proceedings of Computing in Cardiology Conference, pp. 521–524 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M., West, R.: The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 6, 1–11 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Noorbergen, T., Adam, M.T.P., Attia, J.R., Cornforth, D.J., Minichiello, M.: Using mobile heart rate measurements for health promotion: an integrative theoretical framework. In: Chiong, R., Cornforth, D., Bao, Y. (eds.) Applied Informatics and Technology Innovation, pp. 1–22. Springer (in press)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mladovsky, P., Srivastava, D., Cylus, J., Karanikolos, M., Evetovits, T., Thomson, S., McKee, M.: Health policy responses to the financial crisis in Europe. World Health Organization (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Linder, S.M., Rosenfeldt, A.B., Reiss, A., Buchanan, S., Sahu, K., Bay, C.R., Wolf, S.L., Alberts, J.L.: The home stroke rehabilitation and monitoring system trial: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Stroke 8, 46–53 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iuga, A.O., McGuire, M.J.: Adherence and health care costs. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 7, 35–44 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Free, C., Phillips, G., Galli, L., Watson, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., Patel, V., Haines, A.: The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 10, 1–45 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    NIH: Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. National Institutes of Health (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Jongh, T., Gurol-Urganci, I., Vodopivec-Jamsek, V., Car, J., Atun, R.: Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses (review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 12, 1–50 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cornforth, D.J., Koenig, A., Riener, R., August, K., Khandoker, A.H., Karmakar, C., Palaniswami, M., Jelinek, H.F.: The role of serious games in robot exoskeleton-assisted rehabilitation of stroke patients. In: Loh, C.S., Sheng, Y., Ifenthaler, D. (eds.) Serious Games Analytics. AGL, pp. 233–254. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05834-4_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riedl, R., Davis, F.D., Hevner, A.R.: Towards a NeuroIS research methodology: intensifying the discussion on methods, tools, and measurement. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15, i–xxxv (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Samhan, B., Dadgar, M., Joshi, K.D.: Mobile health information technology and patient care: methods, themes, and research gaps. In: Transactions of the International Conference on Health Information Technology Advancement, pp. 18–29 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanders, E.B.N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 5–18 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Donetto, S., Tsianakas, V., Robert, G.: Using Experience-Based Co-design to Improve the Quality of Healthcare: Mapping Where We are Now and Establishing Future Directions. King’s College London, London (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suh, K., Kim, H., Suh, E.K.: What if your avatar looks like you? Dual-congruity perspectives for avatar use. MIS Q. 35, 711–729 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yee, N., Bailenson, J.N.: The Proteus effect: the effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Hum. Commun. Res. 33, 271–290 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wrzesien, M., Rodríguez, A., Rey, B., Alcañiz, M., Baños, R.M., Vara, M.D.: How the physical similarity of avatars can influence the learning of emotion regulation strategies in teenagers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 101–111 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luppicini, R.: Handbook of Research on Technoself: Identity in a Technological Society. IGI Global, Hershey (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davis, M.: Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Westview Press, Boulder (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parks, P., Cruz, R., Ahn, S.J.G.: Don’t hurt my avatar: the use and potential of digital self-representation in risk communication. Int. J. Robots Educ. Art 4, 10–20 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laurel, B.: Design Research: Methods and Perspectives. The MIT Press, London (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Minichiello, M.A., Anelli, L., Kelly, D.: Drawing to aid recovery and survival. In: Tracey Special Issue, STEAM, pp. 1–15 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen, G.D., Lee, J.H., Wang, C.Y., Chao, P.Y., Li, L.Y., Lee, T.Y.: An empathic avatar in a computer-aided learning program to encourage and persuade learners. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15, 62–72 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim, H.-K., Kim, S.-H.: Understanding emotional bond between the creator and the avatar: change in behavioral intentions to engage in alcohol-related traffic risk behaviors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 186–200 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eslinger, P.J., Parkinson, K., Shamay, S.G.: Empathy and social-emotional factors in recovery from stroke. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 15, 91–97 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Merz, B., Tuch, A.N., Opwis, K.: Perceived user experience of animated transitions in mobile user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Santa Clara, California, USA, pp. 3152–3158 (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Horain, P., Soares, J.M., Rai, P.K., Bideau, A.: Virtually enhancing the perception of user actions. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Augmented Tele-existence, Christchurch, NZ, pp. 245–246 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dodds, T.J., Mohler, B.J., Bülthoff, H.H.: Talk to the virtual hands: self-animated avatars improve communication in head-mounted display virtual environments. PLoS ONE 6, 1–12 (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cruz-Cunha, M.M.: Encyclopedia of e-Health and Telemedicine. IGI Global, Hershey (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stephenson, S., Wiles, R.: Advantages and disadvantages of the home setting for therapy: views of patients and therapists. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 63, 59–64 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hong, G.R.S., Song, J.A.: Relationship between familiar environment and wandering behaviour among Korean elders with dementia. J. Clin. Nurs. 18, 1365–1373 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nordin, Å., Sunnerhagen, K.S., Axelsson, Å.B.: Patients’ expectations of coming home with very early supported discharge and home rehabilitation after stroke - an interview study. BMC Neurol. 15, 1–9 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wottrich, A.W., Von Koch, L., Tham, K.: The meaning of rehabilitation in the home environment after acute stroke from the perspective of a multiprofessional team. Phys. Ther. 87, 778–788 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Um, E., Plass, J.L., Hayward, E.O., Homer, B.D.: Emotional design in multimedia learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 104, 485–498 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Plass, J.L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E.O., Homer, B.D., Um, E.: Emotional design in multi-media learning: effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learn. Instr. 29, 128–140 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mori, M., MacDorman, K.F., Kageki, N.: The uncanny valley. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19, 98–100 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Riedl, R., Mohr, P.N.C., Kenning, P.H., Davis, F.D., Heekeren, H.R.: Trusting humans and avatars: a brain imaging study based on evolution theory. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 30, 83–114 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Birren, F.: Color Psychology and Color Therapy: A Factual Study of the Influence of Color on Human Life. Pickle Partners Publishing, Chicago (2016)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    MacKay, D.G., Ahmetzanov, M.V.: Emotion, memory, and attention in the taboo stroop paradigm an experimental analogue of flashbulb memories. Psychol. Sci. 16, 25–32 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jalil, N.A., Yunus, R.M., Said, N.S.: Environmental colour impact upon human behaviour: a review. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 35, 1–21 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Valdez, P., Mehrabian, A.: Effects of color on emotions. J. Exp. Psychol. 123, 394–409 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Greene, T.C., Bell, P.A., Boyer, W.N.: Coloring the environment: hue, arousal, and boredom. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 21, 253–254 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Burke, L.E., Ma, J., Azar, K.M., Bennett, G.G., Peterson, E.D., Zheng, Y., Riley, W., Stephens, J., Shah, S.H., Suffoletto, B., Turan, T.N.: Current science on consumer use of mobile health for cardiovascular disease prevention. Circulation 132, 1157–1213 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Marrero, S.L., Bloom, D.E., Adashi, E.Y.: Noncommunicable diseases: a global health crisis in a new world order. JAMA 307, 2037–2038 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wei, X., Zhu, Z., Yin, L., Ji, Q.: A real time face tracking and animation system. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, pp. 1–8 (2004)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Staiano, A.E., Calvert, S.L.: The promise of exergames as tools to measure physical health. Entertain. Comput. 2, 17–21 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yoon, G., Vargas, P.T.: Know thy avatar: the unintended effect of virtual-self representation on behavior. Psychol. Sci. 25, 1043–1045 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A.K., Ryan, R.M.: Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 35, 1315–1329 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cyr, D.: Modeling web site design across cultures: relationships to trust, satisfaction, and e-loyalty. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 47–72 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Laver, K.E., George, S., Thomas, S., Deutsch, J.E., Crotty, M.: Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 1–107 (2015)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Silver, B.: Virtual reality versus reality in post-stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 15, 996–997 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Piran, P., Thomas, J., Kunnakkat, S., Pandey, A., Tanner, T.G., Burton, D., Balucani, C., Jensen, A., Levine, S.R.: A systematic review of commercially available medical mobile applications for stroke survivors and caregivers. In: Proceedings of International Stroke Conference (2015)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Javor, A., Riedl, R., Kirchmayr, M., Reichenberger, M., Ransmayr, G.: Trust behavior in Parkinson’s disease: results of a trust game experiment. BMC Neurol. 15, 126 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Javor, A., Ransmayr, G., Struhal, W., Riedl, R.: Parkinson patients’ initial trust in avatars: theory and evidence. PLoS ONE 11, 1–21 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hussain M. Aljaroodi
    • 1
  • Marc T. P. Adam
    • 1
  • Raymond Chiong
    • 1
  • David J. Cornforth
    • 1
  • Mario Minichiello
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations