A Reflection on IT Implementation Challenges in State Institution: A Case Study on Development Projects at Indonesian Judiciary

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 504)

Abstract

There are two major challenges in implementing technological solutions as part of institutional reform in development project: the alignment issues with bigger – nationwide – agenda and addressing the resistance in – usually – corrupt environment. This paper aim to provide some reflections on the implementation of information technology to reform the Indonesian judiciaries. Lessons learned from past experiences are provided, as well as a proposal to modify the classic IT-business alignment model and the use of agent based approach to determine the information technology implementation roadmap.

Keywords

IT alignment Strategic alignment Resistance Corruption Rational choice Judiciary reform 

References

  1. 1.
    Akerlof, G.A.: The market for ‘Lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 84(3), 488–500 (1970). The MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alkostar, A., Fathony, H.Z., Mulyana, F.: Start simple: using technology to improve governance, transparency and accountability - an Indonesian court experience. In: Paper and Presentation for the 4th Asia Pacific Judicial Reform Forum, Beijing (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ayuba, B., Aliyu, I.A.: The role of information communication technology (ICT) in combating corrupt business activities in Nigeria. IOSR J. Bus. Manage. 16(7), 7–14 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker, G.S.: The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1976)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bockova, K.H., Slavikova, G., Gabrhel, J.: Game theory as tool of project management. In: Proceeding at 20th International Scientific Conference Economics and Management, (ICEM-2015) (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dzutsati, V.: An Agent-Based Model of Corruption: Micro Approach The ODD Protocol of a Replication of Ross Hammond’s Corruption Model, Open Agent Based Model (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Epstein, B.: Agent-based modeling and the fallacies of individualism. In: Humphreys, P., Imbert, C. (eds.) Models, Simulations, and Representations, pp. 115–144. Routledge, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fathony, H.Z.: Assessing corruption risks in the judiciary: what role for the community? In: Presentation for the 16th International Anti-Corruption Conference, Putrajaya, Malaysia (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fathony, H.Z.: Developing relevant judicial capabilities: efforts to regain the confidence – the Indonesia experience. In: Presentation for the 5th Asia Pacific Judical Reform Forum, Singapore (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fathony, H.Z.: Knowledge management for legal education: expanding the use of supreme court judgement directory. In: Presentation for the International Conference Southeast Asia Legal Education: Preparing Lawyers for Tomorrow’s Society and Profession, A Joint Conference Between University of Washington Law School and Faculty of Law Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hammond, R.: Endogenous transition dynamics in corruption: an agent-based computer model, Center on Social and Economic Dynamics Working Paper No. 19 (2000) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic Alignment-A Model for Organizational Transformation Through Information Technology, pp. 97–117. Oxford University Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment—leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 4–16 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grönlund A., Heacock, R., Sasaki, D., Hellström, J., Al-Saqaf, W.: Increasing transparency and fighting corruption through ICT empowering people and communities, SPIDER ICT4D Series No. 3 (2010) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ionescu, L.: The role of technology in combating corruption. Econ. Manage. Finan. Markets 8(3), 101–106 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luftman, J.N.: Managing the Information Technology Resource: Leadership in the Information Age. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luftman, J., Kempaiah, R.: An update on business-IT alignment: a line has been drawn. MIS Q. Executive 6(3), 165–177 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nash, J.: Non-cooperative games. Ann. Math. 54(2), 286–295 (1951)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neumann, J.V., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1953)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prasad, A., Shivarajan, S.: Understanding the role of technology in reducing corruption: a transaction cost approach. J. Public Aff. 15(1), 22–39 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reiling, D.: Technology for Justice. Leiden University Press, Leiden (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Situngkir, H., Khanafiah, D.: Theorizing corruption through agent-based modeling. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems Research (2006) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Suyudi, A., Fathony, H.Z., Putra, H.A., Eisenhart, D., dan Rodja, S.M.: Pemetaan Implementasi Teknologi Informasi di Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Voinea, C.F.: Briberyscape: an artificial society-based simulation model of corruption’s emergence and growth. Eur. Q. Polit. Attitudes Mentalities 2(1), 27–54 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wickberg, S.: Technological innovations to identify and reduce corruption. U4 and Transparency International, March 2013Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reynolds, P., Yetton, P.: Aligning business and IT strategies in multi-business organizations. J. Inf. Technol. 30(2), 101–118 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jasper, M.A.: Using reflective writing within research. J. Res. Nurs. 10(3), 247–260 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer ScienceUniversity of IndonesiaDepokIndonesia

Personalised recommendations