Impact of Cognitive Learning Disorders on Accessing Online Resources

Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10279)

Abstract

The present document assesses the impact of learning cognitive disorders on accessing online resources. This paper relates to Human Factor and Systems Interaction since it covers the wider social concerns leading to improved access to computers and system by currently disadvantaged groups in this paper focuses on people with cognitive learning disorders. This is a thought exercise study and examines how technology, represented by online resources, is made available without discriminating against those with learning cognitive disorders. The learning impact has been assessed by the Human Factors based methods of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), Usability Engineering (UE) and Ontology Sketch Modelling (OSM). The major finding of the study is that whilst there are tools that make access to many resources more equitable, there is still limited understanding of how those with cognitive disorders assimilate information. In addressing this aspect, the present document has examined the wider role of semantic web technology that by introducing codification of context and pragmatics can improve the presentation of knowledge such that those with cognitive learning disorders can achieve non-discriminatory access to online resources. The aim of this paper is to consider how online resources are presented to ensure that irrespective of the level of cognitive impairment the semantic value of resources is conveyed equally to all users. From this study, a few key lessons were learned from examining the impact of learning cognitive disorder on accessing online resources. The impact can be minimal since guidelines and web standards if followed ensure sites and systems have adequate accessibility and usability design or built into the interfaces from the beginning. Also, it could be argued for greater built-in support to allow for less reliance on 3rd party aid tools since while that would give benefit to users with cognitive learning disorders it would also benefit all users since it is natural to take advantage of tools which can benefit the overall work process. Finally, a future study should cover a more in-depth assessment which could involve a blind test of tasks with a mixture of people with and without learning disabilities to ensure a more in-depth examination of the impact of learning cognitive disorders on accessing online resources.

Keywords

UX and usability User experience 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Blandford, A., Green, T.R.G.: OSM: an ontology-based approach to usability evaluation. In: Workshop on Representations, Queen Mary College London (1997)Google Scholar
  2. CENELEC: Accessibility week – Design for All. http://www.cencenelec.eu/news/brief_news/Pages/TN-2014-018.aspx Accessed 10 Apr 2016
  3. Checkland, P.: Systems Thinking, Systems Practice – Includes a 30-year Retrospective. Wiley, Chichester (2005)Google Scholar
  4. Dysgraphia.org.uk. http://dysgraphia.org.uk/. Accessed 01 Mar 2016
  5. Ernst, N.A., Storey, M.-A., Allen, P.: Cognitive support for ontology modelling. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 62, 553–577 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greenberg, J.: Advancing the semantic web via library functions. Cataloguing Classif. Q. 43(3–4), 203–225 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lytras, M., Sicilia, M.-A., Davies, J., Kashyap, V.: Digital libraries in the knowledge era – knowledge management and semantic web technologies. Library Manag. 26(4/5), 170–175 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Neumann, E., Prusak, L.: Knowledge networks in the age of the semantic web. Briefings Bioinform. 8(3), 141–149 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Preece, J., Sharp, H., Rogers, Y.: Interaction Design – Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 4th edn. Wiley, Glasgow (2015)Google Scholar
  11. European Commission: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of public sector bodies’ websites https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/proposal-directive-european-parliament-and-council-accessibility-public-sector-bodies-websites. Accessed 05 Mar 2016
  12. Semanticweb.org.edu: Main Page. http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Main_Page.html. Accessed 04 Mar 2016
  13. Skeja, E.: The impact of cognitive intervention program and music therapy in learning disabilities. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 159, 605–609 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomas, O., Fellmann, M.: Semantic process modelling – design and implementation of an ontology-based representation of business processes. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1, 438 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. United Nations: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml. Accessed 05 Mar 2016
  16. Wellness: Cognitive and Learning Disorder. http://www.wellness.com/reference/conditions/cognitive-and-learning-disorders. Accessed 01 Mar 2016
  17. W3: Usability – ISO 9241 Definition. https://www.w3.org/2002/Talks/0104-usabilityprocess/slide3-0.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.C3LSawbrideworthUK

Personalised recommendations