Advertisement

The Use of Drama in Socio-Scientific Inquiry-Based Learning

  • Roald P. Verhoeff
Chapter
Part of the Contributions from Science Education Research book series (CFSE, volume 3)

Abstract

Drama is relatively unexplored in academic science education. This chapter addresses in what way drama may allow science students to explore socio-scientific issues on neuro-technologies. We connect to the educational framework, socio-scientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL), which integrates inquiry-based science education, socio-scientific issues and citizenship education. We explore the use of drama to enhance reflexivity in embracing and critiquing socio-scientific issues on emerging technologies. So far, only few empirical studies have been published concerning the effectiveness of drama in science education. In most papers describing the use of drama, students are typically involved as spectators. In our case, 22 students from various science disciplines were involved in a drama experiment, performing multiple roles as authors, actors, reviewers and audience. Qualitative data was collected on the educational process and student performance during the course and the performed one-act play. The drama experiment showed to be an effective SSIBL approach in activating students to open up a future lifeworld which they could relate to. It allowed them to acquire insights in social and ethical implications of neuro-technologies and created awareness of different viewpoints, primarily in everyday life settings. The results presented in this chapter underline the potential of the SSIBL approach in stimulating students to take a reflexive position on the socio-scientific particularities of science and technology. However, they also illustrate some difficulties in combining drama and science education. Using drama faces the challenge of learners perceiving the design and performance of a play to be less effective as opposed to more traditional ways of learning.

Keywords

Drama in education Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning Neuro-technology Qualitative research 

References

  1. Bolton, G. M. (1984). Drama as education: An argument for placing drama at the centre of the curriculum. London: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Bolton, G. M. (1985). Changes in thinking about drama in education. Theory into Practice, 24(3), 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braund, M. (2015). Drama and learning science: An empty space? British Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 102–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colucci-Gray, L., Camino, E., Barbiero, G., & Gray, D. (2006). From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education. Science Education, 90(2), 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorion, K. R. (2009). Science through drama: A multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities used in secondary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2247–2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fels, L., & Meyer, K. (1997). On the edge of chaos: Co-evolving worlds of drama and science. Teaching Education, 9(1), 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heathcote, D., & Bolton, G. (1995). Drama for learning. Dorothy Heathcote’s mantle of the expert approach to education. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Kottler, J. A. (1994). Advanced group leadership. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  9. Knippels, M. C. P., Severiens, S. E., & Klop, T. (2009). Education through fiction: Acquiring opinion-forming skills in the context of genomics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2057–2083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levinson, R., and The PARRISE Consortium (2014). The SSIBL framework, D1.2 PARRISE, co-funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme, Utrecht/Institute of Education, London.Google Scholar
  11. McSharry, G., & Jones, S. (2000). Role-play in science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 82(298), 73–82.Google Scholar
  12. Ødegaard, M. (2003). Dramatic science. A critical review of drama in science education. Studies in Science Education, 39, 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Neill, C. (1985). Imagined worlds in theatre and drama. Theory into Practice, 24(3), 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Neill, C. (1995). Drama worlds: A framework for process drama. Portsmouth: Heinemann Drama.Google Scholar
  15. Savulescu, J., ter Meulen, R., & Kahane, G. (Eds.). (2011). Enhancing human capacities. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Shepherd-Barr, K. (2006). Science on stage: From Doctor Faustus to Copenhagen. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Toonders, W., Verhoeff, R. P., & Zwart, H. (2016). Performing the future. On the use of drama in philosophy courses for science students. Science & Education. doi: 10.1007/s11191-016-9853-3.
  18. Wieringa, N. F., Swart, J. A., Maples, T., Witmondt, L., Tobi, H., & van der Windt, H. J. (2011). Science Theatre at School: Providing a context to learn about socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1(1), 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zwart, H. (2014). Limitless as a neuro-pharmaceutical experiment and as a Daseinsanalyse: On the use of fiction in preparatory debates on cognitive enhancement. Medicine, Health Care & Philosophy: A European Journal, 17(1), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations