Brazilian Female Diplomats and the Struggle for Gender Equality

  • Rogério de Souza Farias
  • Gessica Fernanda do Carmo
Part of the Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations book series (SID)


This chapter presents a brief history of how Brazilian diplomacy tackled the issue of women in its workforce and appraises current application patterns, career paths and posting of men and women. It is based on extensive research in private and public archives and on a database with information on diplomats who entered the organisation from 1902 to 2010 and retired or stayed in the organisation until 2015. Formal legal barriers ended after decades of struggle, but the professional diplomatic ethos still has a gender bias. We believe the case shows how the end of formal barriers is just the first step in a greater quest for gender equality.


  1. A mulher no serviço. 1940. Correio da Manhã, June 7.Google Scholar
  2. Alencastro, Catarina. 2015. Diplomatas relatam casos de assédio dentro do Itamaraty. O Globo, December 1.Google Scholar
  3. Bandeira, Luísa Luga. 2011. “Expulsa” após casar, ex-diplomata tenta voltar ao Itamaraty. Folha de São Paulo, March 14.Google Scholar
  4. Bridgeman, Brent, and Charles Lewis. 1994. The Relationship of Essay and Multiple-choice Scores with Grades in College Courses. Journal of Educational Measurement 31 (1): 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruschini, Cristina. 2000. Gênero e trabalho no Brasil: novas conquistas ou persistência da discriminação? (Brasil, 1985/95). In Trabalho e gênero: mudanças, permanências e desafios, ed. Maria Isabel Baltar da Rocha, 13–58. São Paulo: Editora 34.Google Scholar
  6. Coles, Anne. 2008. Making Multiple Migrations: The Life of British Diplomatic Families Overseas. In Gender and Family Among Transnational Professionals, ed. Anne Coles and Anne-Meike Fechter, 125–147. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, James, and Vil Singh. 2006. Exploring Gendered Leadership. In Women in Leadership and Management, ed. Duncan Mctavish and Karen Miller, 11–31. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, Charles. 2014. Diplomatic Sexism: Does the Foreign Office Discriminate Against Female Diplomats? Accessed April 6, 2016.
  9. Educação e ensino. 1941. Jornal do Brasil. December 3.Google Scholar
  10. Favero, Linda Williams, and Renee Guarrielle Heath. 2012. Generational Perspectives in the Workplace Interpreting the Discourses that Constitute Women’s Struggle to Balance Work and Life. Journal of Business Communication 49 (4): 332–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. French, Kate. 1995. Men and Locations of Power: Why Move Over? In Gender, Culture and Organizational Change: Putting Theory into Practice, ed. Catherine Itzin and Janet Newman, 54–67. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallo, Mel Bleil. 2015. Abuso diplomático. Accessed December 4, 2015.
  13. Groysberg, Boris, and Robin, Abrahams. 2014. Manage Your Work, Manage Your Life. Harvard Business Review, March 2014.Google Scholar
  14. Hewlett, Sylvia Ann, and Ripa Rashid. 2011. The Battle for Female Talent in Brazil. New York: Center for Work-Life Policy.Google Scholar
  15. Hiss, William C., and Valerie W., Franks. 2014. Defining Promise: Optional Standardized Testing Policies in American College and University Admissions. Accessed December 30, 2015.
  16. Hyde, Janet Shibley, and Kristen C. Kling. 2001. Women, Motivation, and Achievement. Psychology of Women Quarterly 25 (4): 364–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ibarra, Herminia. 2012. To Close the Gender Gap, Focus on Assignments. Harvard Business Review, May 22.Google Scholar
  18. Letukas, Lynn. 2016. College Admissions Testing: Current Understanding and Future Implications. Sociology Compass 10 (1): 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Linn, Marcia C., Tina De Benedictis, et al. 1987. Gender Differences in National Assessment of Educational Progress Science Items: What does “I Don’t Know” Really Mean? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24 (3): 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moschkovich, Marília, and Ana Maria F. Almeida. 2015. Desigualdades de gênero na carreira acadêmica no Brasil. Dados 58 (3): 749–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MRE. 2014. Portaria N° 491. Diário Oficial da União, September 15.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2015. Nota de esclarecimento (N° 487). Accessed April 10, 2016.
  23. ———. 2016. Youtube Channel. Accessed September 25, 2016.
  24. Quintella, Thereza. 2002. Mulheres Diplomatas. O Globo, December 26.Google Scholar
  25. Ribeiro, Lilian Lopes, and Emerson Marinho. 2012. Time Poverty in Brazil: Measurement and Analysis of its Determinants. Estudos Econômicos 42 (2): 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, Daryl G. 2015. Diversity’s Promise for Higher Education: Making it Work. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Spektor, Matias. 2015. Mulheres diplomatas. Folha de São Paulo, November 12.Google Scholar
  28. Wainer, Howard, and Linda Steinberg. 1992. Sex Differences in Performance on the Mathematics Section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A Bidirectional Validity Study. Harvard Educational Review 62 (3): 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Williams, Joan C. 2014. Hacking Tech’s Diversity Problem. Harvard Business Review, October.Google Scholar
  30. Willingham, Warren W., and Nancy S. Cole. 2013. Gender and Fair Assessment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. World Bank. 2014. Gender at Work: A Companion to the World Development Report on Jobs. Accessed May 20, 2015.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rogério de Souza Farias
    • 1
  • Gessica Fernanda do Carmo
    • 2
  1. 1.National School of Public AdministrationBrasíliaBrazil
  2. 2.San Tiago Dantas Graduate ProgramSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations