Advertisement

A Human-Centered Perspective on Software Quality: Acceptance Criteria for Work 4.0

  • Holger FischerEmail author
  • Michael Engler
  • Stefan Sauer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10288)

Abstract

The digitization of industrial manufacturing workflows results in an interconnection between employees, between employees and machines as well as between machines. Lots of information and data about past, current or even predicted states of products and machines arise. Workflows as well as work organization will change due to topics such as big data analytics, machine learning, predictive maintenance, or new work concepts. The direct and indirect interaction between digitization and all new processes of work design and work organization is subject of the research area Work 4.0. Digital assistance systems are able to support the employees in gathering, interpretation and communication with data, machines and colleagues.

Despite all efforts, todays software products still lack of quality in respect of inadequate functionality and usability. Thus, current software engineering methods seems to be insufficient and software quality models seem to be only focused on technological acceptance instead of human-centered and business-centered acceptance.

This paper presents a human-centered acceptance quality model and acceptance criteria for digital assistance systems with a focus on the industrial manufacturing context. The aim is to enrich the communication and integration of human-centered activities in software engineering methods supporting a common language and understanding of quality goals as well as of metrics for the evaluation of improvements due to the use of digital assistance systems.

Keywords

Acceptance Digital assistance systems Human-centered design Software quality ISO/IEC 25010 Work 4.0 

References

  1. 1.
    Maslow, A.H.: A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50(4), 370–396 (1943)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zeiner, K.M., Laib, M., Schippert, K., Burmester, M.: Identifying experience categories to design for positive experience with technology at work. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3013–3020. ACM, NY (2016). doi: 10.1145/2851581.2892548
  3. 3.
    German Federal Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs (BMAS): Re-Imagining Work - Green Paper Work 4.0 (2015). http://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF-Publikationen/arbeiten-4-0-green-paper.pdf. Accessed Apr 2016
  4. 4.
    Morgan, J.: The Future of Work Attract New Talent, Build Better Leaders, and Create a Competitive Organization. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs, Energy (BMWi): Monitoring Report Digital Economy (2014). http://www.bmwi.de/EN/Service/publications,did=686950.html. Accessed Feb 2017
  6. 6.
    Johnson, J.: CHAOS 2014. The Standish Group (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sage Software GmbH: Independent Study on IT investments (2014). http://goo.gl/qy0eM0. Accessed Feb 2017
  8. 8.
    ISO/IEC 25010: Systems and software engineering - Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and software quality models (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bevan, N., Carter, J., Earthy, J., Geis, T., Harker, S.: New ISO standards for usability, usability reports and usability measures. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9731, pp. 268–278. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-39510-4_25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bischoff, J.: Open up the potential of the application of Industry 4.0 with SME (translated from German). Study on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) (2015). https://www.agiplan.de/fileadmin/pdf_dokumente/Studie_Industrie_40_BMWi_gesamt.pdf. Accessed Feb 2017
  11. 11.
    Iben, H., Baumann, H., Ruthenbeck, C., Klug, T.: Visual based picking supported by context awareness. In: Proceedings of ICMI-MLMI 2009, pp. 281–288. ACM, NY (2009). doi: 10.1145/1647314.1647374
  12. 12.
    Funk, M., Shirazi, A.S., Mayer, S., Lischke, L., Schmidt, A.: Pick from here! - an interactive mobile cart using in-situ projection for order picking. In: Proceedings of UbiComp 2015, pp. 601–609. ACM, NY (2015). doi: 10.1145/2750858.2804268
  13. 13.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, NY (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO 9241–11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ISO 9241–210: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shewhart, W.A.: Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. Van Nostrand Company Inc., NY (1931)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K., Walters, G.F.: Factors in Software Quality. Vols. I–III. Rome Air Development Centre, Griffiss Air Force Base, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Kaspar, H., Lipow, M., McLeod, G., Merrit, M.: Characteristics of Software Quality. North Holland Publishing, Amsterdam (1978)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grady, R.B.: Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1992)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seffah, A., Gulliksen, J., Desmarais, M.C.: An introduction to human-centered software engineering - integrating usability in the development process. In: Seffah, A., Gulliksen, J., Desmarais, M.C. (eds.) Human-Centered Software Engineering Integrating Usability in the Software Development Lifecycle, pp. 3–14. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ISO 9241–110: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    ISO/DIS 9241–220: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 110: Dialogue principles (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SICPPaderborn UniversityPaderbornGermany
  2. 2.Michael Engler IT-ConsultingEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations