Integrating Participatory and Interaction Design of an Authoring Tool for Learning Objects Involving a Multidisciplinary Team

  • André Luiz de Brandão Damasceno
  • Carlos de Salles Soares Neto
  • Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10288)

Abstract

Traditional computer use in educational environments does not ensure learning improvement. Consequently, there is a global effort to make and provide more effective and efficient use of new multimedia resources and learning environments. Learning Objects (LOs) are entities, digital or not, which can be used or referenced during teaching. However, multimedia authoring of LOs is still complex and time consuming. In this paper we present a novel process integrating participatory and interaction design which we adopted in the development of an authoring tool involving a multidisciplinary team. As result, this methodology is used in the development of Cacuriá, a multimedia authoring tool for teachers with little or no programming skills to create LOs.

Keywords

Authoring tool Mental-model Navigation/search design Participatory Design Interaction Design Learning Objects 

References

  1. 1.
    IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC): Draft standard for learning object metadata. IEEE Standard 1484.12.1 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wiley, D.A.: Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In: Wiley, D.A. (ed.) The Instructional Use of Learning Objects (2000). http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc
  3. 3.
    Miller, L., Soh, L., Samal, A., Nugent, G., Kupzyk, K., Masmaliyeva, L.: Evaluating the use of learning objects in CS1. In: Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2011), pp. 57–62 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paternò, F.: End user development: survey of an emerging field for empowering people. ISRN Softw. Eng. 2013, 532659 (2013). Hindawi Publishing CorporationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martikainen, S., Ikävalko, P., Korpela, M.: Participatory interaction design in user requirements specification in healthcare. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 160, 304–308 (2010). MEDINFO 2010Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO standard 9241Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simonsen, J., Robertson, T.: Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Preece, J.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simonsen, J., Hertzum, M.: Sustained participatory design: extending the iterative approach. Des. Issues 25(3), 10–21 (2012). MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Damasceno, A.L.B., Soares Neto, C.S., Barbosa, S.D.J.: Lessons learned from evaluating an authoring tool for learning objects. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction HCII 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nielsen, J.: Card Sorting: How Many Users to Test (2004). http://www.nngroup.com/articles/card-sorting-how-many-users-to-test/
  13. 13.
    Snyder, C.: Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy Way to Design and Refine User Interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann, San Diego (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J., Booch, G.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Sousa Neto, F., Bezerra, E., Dias, D.: ITV-Learning: a prototype for construction of learning objects for interactive digital television. In: Proceedings of International Conference of the Future of Education, pp. 486–490 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    HotPotatoes. http://hotpot.uvic.ca
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Sousa, F., Bezerra, P., Soares, I.: MARKER: a tool for building interactive applications for T-learning. In: Proceedings of 19th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia 2013), pp. 281–284 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Advanced Distributed Learning. Sharable Content Object Reference Model, 4th edn. (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meixner, B., Siegel, B., Hölbling, G., Lehner, F., Kosch, H.: SIVA suite: authoring system and player for interactive non-linear videos. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM 2010), pp. 1563–1566 (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Summerfield, M., Blanchette, J.: C++ GUI Programming with Qt 4. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soares, L.F.G., Moreno, M., Neto, C.S.S., Moreno, M.: Ginga-NCL: declarative middleware for multimedia IPTV services. IEEE Communications Magazine 48(6), 74–81 (2010). IEEECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Luiz de Brandão Damasceno
    • 1
  • Carlos de Salles Soares Neto
    • 2
  • Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa
    • 1
  1. 1.Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Federal University of MaranhãoSão LuísBrazil

Personalised recommendations