Advertisement

Everyday Life Interactions of Women 60+ with ICTs: Creations of Meaning and Negotiations of Identity

  • Barbara RatzenböckEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10297)

Abstract

How do women 60+ use and ascribe meaning to “new” and “old” information and communication technologies such as cell phones, the Internet, computers, TV, and radio? To investigate this question, life-graph discussions, walking interviews in small domestic spaces, and semi-structured interviews with Austrian women aged 60–70 have been conducted. The analysis of the material collected has shown that both generation-specific experiences of media usage and individual biographical backgrounds influence the use of and ascription of meaning to ICTs. However, ICT usage does not only reflect collective generational experiences and individual biographical circumstances. ICTs are also actively used by women 60+ to creatively shape their identities as women and older adults. Thus, this paper discusses processes and strategies of identity negotiations of women 60+ in the context of ICTs, and explores how everyday life interactions with ICTs can be interpreted as a means of resistance against normative assumptions such as ageist stereotypes.

Keywords

Women 60+ ICT experiences Everyday life Identity Generations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funds from the Österreichische Nationalbank (Österreichische Nationalbank, Anniversary Fund, project number: 15849). In addition, this work was also supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to the Ageing, Communication, Technologies project 895-2013-1018 (actproject.ca).

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    European Commission: The European eGovernment Action Plan 2011–2015. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0743:FIN:EN:PDF
  4. 4.
    Richardson, M., Weaver, C.K., Zorn, T.: ‘Getting on’: older New Zealanders’. Percept. Comput. New Media Soc. 7, 219–245 (2005). doi: 10.1177/1444805050763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loos, E., Haddon, L., Mante-Meijer, E.: Introduction. In: Loos, E., Haddon, L., Mante-Meijer, E. (eds.) Generational Use of New Media, pp. 1–9. Ashgate, Farnham (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ratzenböck, B.: Examining the experienced of older women with ICTs. Interrelations of generation-specific media practices and individual media biographies. Nordicom Rev. 37, 57–70 (2016). doi: 10.1515/nor-2016-0023 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bude, H.: Generation im Kontext. Von der Kriegs-zu den Wohlfahrtsstaatsgenerationen. [Generation Contextualized. From the War Generations to the Generations of the Welfare State] In: Jureit, J., Wildt, M. (eds.) Generationen. Zur Relevanz eines wissenschaftlichen Grundbegriffs [Generations. On the Relevance of a Basic Concept in Science], Hamburg, Hamburger edn., pp. 28–44 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schäffer, B.: Mediengenerationen, Medienkohorten und generationsspezifische Medienpraxiskulturen. Zum Generationenansatz in der Medienforschung. [Media Generations, Media Cohorts and Generation-specific Media Practice Cultures. On the Generational Approach in Media Studies] In: Schorb, B., Hartung, A., Reißmann, W. (eds.) Medien und höheres Lebensalter. Theorie – Forschung – Praxis [Media and Old(er) Age. Theory – Research – Practice], pp. 31–50. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bolin, G., Westlund, O.: Mobile generations: the role of mobile technology in the shaping of Swedish media generations. Int. J. Commun. 3, 108–124 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buse, C.E.: E-scaping the aging body? Computer technologies and embodiment in later life. Aging Soc. 30, 987–1009 (2010). doi: 10.1017/S0144686X10000164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nascimento Ordonez, T., Sanches Yassuda, M., Cachioni, M.: Elderly online: effects of a digital inclusion program in cognitive performance. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 53, 216–219 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cattan, M.: The use of telephone befriending in low level support for socially isolated older people – an evaluation. Health Soc. Care Commun. 19(2), 198–206 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lelkes, O.: Happier and less isolated: internet use in old age. J. Poverty Soc. Justice 21(1), 33–46 (2013). doi: 10.1332/175982713X664047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buse, C.E.: When you retire, does everything become leisure? Information and communication technology use and the work/leisure boundary in retirement. New Media Soc. 11(7), 1143–1161 (2009). doi: 10.1177/1461444809342052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sawchuk, K., Crow, B.: I’m G-mom on the phone. Remote grandmothering, cell phones and inter-generational dis/connections. Feminist Media Stud. 12(4), 496–505 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crow, B., Sawchuk, K.: New and old, young and old. Aging the mobile imaginary. In: Herman, A., Hadlaw, J., Swiss, T. (eds.) Theories of the Mobile Internet: Materialities and Imaginaries, pp. 187–199. Routledge, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ivan, L., Hebblethwaite, S.: Grannies on the net: grandmothers’ experiences of facebook in family communication. Rom. J. Commun. Public Relat. 18(1), 11–25 (2016). doi: 10.21018/rjcpr.2016.1.199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosales, A., Fernández-Ardèvol, M.: Beyond WhatsApp: older people and smartphones. Rom. J. Commun. Public Relat. 18(1), 27–47 (2016). doi: 10.21018/rjcpr.2016.1.199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vincent, J.A., Phillipson, C., Downs, M.: Part 1. The future of the life course. In: Vincent, J.A., Phillipson, C., Downs, M. (eds.) The Futures of Old Age, pp. 9–11. Sage, London (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alwin, D.F.: Who’s talking about my generation? In: Silverstein, M., Giarrusso, R. (eds.) Kinship and Cohort in an Aging Society, pp. 134–158. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mannheim, K.: The Problem of generations. In: Kecskemeti, P. (ed.) Mannheim: Essays, pp. 276–322. Routledge, London (1952 [1927/28])Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sackmann, R., Winkler, O.: Technology generations revisited: the internet generation. Gerontechnology 11(4), 493–503 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Lancaster University: Transitions in practice: climate change and everyday life: the shower-bath path. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/shove/exhibits/showerv2.pdf
  25. 25.
    Ratzenböck, B.: “Let’s take a look together”: walking interviews in domestic spaces as a means to examine ICT experiences of women 60+. Rom. J. Commun. Public Relat. 18(1), 49–64 (2016). doi: 10.21018/rjcpr.2016.1.201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fernández-Ardèvol, M.: Older people and mobile communication (2014). (Pers. E-Mail from Fernández-Ardèvol to Ratzenböck, B.) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kuckartz, U.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung [Qualitative Content Analysis. Methods, Practice, Computer Support]. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Grounded Theory. Grundlagen Qualitativer Sozialforschung [Grounded Theory. Basics in Qualitative Social Research]. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim (1990)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Maierhofer, R.: Desperately seeking the self: gender, age, and identity in Tillie Olsen’s “Tell Me a Riddle” and Michelle Herman’s “Missing”. Educ. Gerontol. 25(2), 129–141 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maierhofer, R.: Third pregnancy: women, ageing and identity in American culture. An anocritical approach. In: Jansohn, C. (ed.) Old Age and Ageing in British and American Culture and Literature, pp. 155–171. LIT, Vienna (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maierhofer, R.: The old woman as the prototypical American – an anocritical approach to gender, age, and identity. In: Hölbling, W., Rieser, K. (eds.) What is American? New Identities in U.S. Culture, pp. 319–336. LIT, Vienna (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Östlund, B.: Design paradigms and misunderstood technology: the case of older users. In: Jæger, B. (ed.) Young Technologies in Old Hands: An International View on Senior Citizen’s Utilization, pp. 25–39. DJØF Forlag, Copenhagen (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lucius-Hoene, G.: Narrative Identitätsarbeit im Interview. [Narrative Identity Work in Interviews] In: Griese, B. (ed.) Subjekt – Identität – Person. Reflexionen zur Biographieforschung [Subject – Identity – Person. Reflections on Biography Research], pp. 149–170. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hill, R., Beynon-Davies, P., Williams, M.D.: Older people and internet engagement. Acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use. Inf. Technol. People 21(3), 244–266 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Suopajärvi, T.: Past experiences, current practices and future design. Ethnographic study of aging adults’ everyday ICT practices – and how it could benefit public ubiquitous computing design. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 93, 112–123 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Loos, E.F.: Senior citizens: digital immigrants in their own country? Observatorio (OBS*) J. 6(1), 1–23 (2012)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cruikshank, M.: Learning to Be Old: Gender, Culture, and Aging. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham (2013)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J., Madden, L.: Older adults’ use of information and communication technology in everyday life. Ageing Soc. 23(5), 561–582 (2003). doi: 10.1017/S0144686X03001302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Colombo, F., Carlo, S.: Access and use of ICTs among the Italian young elderly: a field study. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9193, pp. 166–176. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20892-3_17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Loe, M.: Doing it my way: old women, technology and wellbeing. Sociol. Health Illn. 32(2), 319–334 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wilińska, M.: An older person and new media in public discourses: impossible encounters? In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9193, pp. 405–413. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20892-3_40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nakao, C.: Käufliches Alter. Konstruktionen subjektiven Alterserlebens in der Marketingkommunikation. [Purchasable Age. Constructions of Subjective Experiences of Age in Marketing Communication]. Springer, Wiesbaden (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Inter-American StudiesUniversity of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations