Advertisement

Efficient Treatment of Synthetic Wastewater Contaminated with Emerging Pollutants by Anaerobic Purple Phototrophic Bacteria

  • I. de las Heras
  • B. Padrino
  • R. Molina
  • Y. Segura
  • J. A. Melero
  • A. F. Mohedano
  • F. Martínez
  • D. Puyol
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 4)

Abstract

This work investigates the biological treatment of synthetic wastewater contaminated with emerging pollutants (EPs) by anaerobic purple phototrophic bacteria (PPB) in a continuous photo-anaerobic membrane bioreactor. The effect of the hydraulic retention time (HRT) on the reactor performance has been analysed. Results indicate that the reactor performance is stable and the PPB can settle inside the reactor. A COD removal efficiency higher than 90% is achieved at a HRT of 24 h. Lowering the HRT to 12 h caused an initial drop of the COD efficiency that was subsequently recovered along the curse of the experiment. Biomass showed a high activity (close to 1 g COD/g COD d) and good settling characteristics when the attached growth was avoided, indicating a good link to downstream processes. Anaerobic digestion of PPB biomass was performed by dedicated BMP tests. Results indicate that lowering the HRT considerably improves the biogenic methane potential, presumably due to accumulation of organic compounds. A further analysis of EPs balances is being carried out and will show the fate of these compounds within the reactor.

Keywords

Anoxygenic purple phototrophic bacteria Emerging pollutants Novel wastewater treatment concept 

References

  1. Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, Borzacconi L, Campos JL, Guwy AJ, Kalyuzhnyi S, Jenicek P, Van Lier JB (2009) Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol 59(5):927–934Google Scholar
  2. Batstone DJ, Hülsen T, Mehta CM, Keller J (2015) Platforms for energy and nutrient recovery from domestic wastewater: a review. Chemosphere 140:2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batstone DJ, Pind PF, Angelidaki I (2003) Kinetics of thermophilic, anaerobic oxidation of straight and branched chain butyrate and valerate. Biotechnol Bioeng 84(2):195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chitapornpan S, Chiemchaisri C, Chiemchaisri W, Honda R, Yamamoto K (2012) Photosynthetic bacteria production from food processing wastewater in sequencing batch and membrane photo-bioreactors. Water Sci Technol 65(3):504–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deblonde T, Cossu-Leguille C, Hartemann P (2011) Emerging pollutants in wastewater: a review of the literature. Int J Hyg Environ Health 214(6):442–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hülsen T, Barry EM, Lu Y, Puyol D, Keller J, Batstone DJ (2016a) Domestic wastewater treatment with purple phototrophic bacteria using a novel continuous photo anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Water Res 100:486–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hülsen T, Barry EM, Lu Y, Puyol D, Batstone DJ (2016b) Low temperature treatment of domestic wastewater by purple phototrophic bacteria: Performance, activity, and community. Water Res 100:537–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Puyol D, Batstone D, Hülsen T, Astals S, Peces M, Krömer J (2017) Resource recovery from wastewater by biological technologies: opportunities, challenges and prospects. Front Microbiol 7(2106) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. de las Heras
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Padrino
    • 1
  • R. Molina
    • 1
  • Y. Segura
    • 1
  • J. A. Melero
    • 1
  • A. F. Mohedano
    • 2
  • F. Martínez
    • 1
  • D. Puyol
    • 1
  1. 1.Group of Chemical and Environmental EngineeringUniversity Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain
  2. 2.Chemical Engineering SectionUniversity Autonoma of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations