Advertisement

User’s Perception of Beach Characteristics and Management in Summer and Autumn Seasons: The Case of Gran Canaria Island (Spain)

  • Carolina Peña-Alonso
  • Eduard Ariza
  • Luis Hernández-Calvento
Chapter
Part of the Coastal Research Library book series (COASTALRL, volume 24)

Abstract

The beaches located in warm regions (with mild and stable climate) are spaces with a potentially continuous arrival of visitors throughout the year. That is a main difference with respect to temperate zones, where the increased demand for activities on the beaches and their surroundings are concentrated in the summer season. In warm regions, like the Canary Islands (Spain), there are differences in the annual flow of visitors in relation to the intensity of their arrival and their origin (local, national and international). In this environment, with insular character and limited resources, the management of beaches as a natural and economic resource, is especially important, as well as meeting the needs of users who visit them. Therefore, the knowledge of the user’s profile and public perception is an essential tool for establishing management measures.

The main objective of this research is to analyze the feedback from users of 12 beaches (four urban beaches, four semi-urban beaches and four natural beaches) located on Gran Canaria island (Spain). In particular the importance of the characteristics of the beaches (cleanliness, landscape, comfort, guarding and safety, recreational offer, quietness, access and parking areas, proximity, services, nature) and their perception of the impacts and the positive bio-physical, economical, and social aspects. The study is based on 1175 user surveys conducted in summer and autumn of 2013. The results indicate that, in both seasons, cleanliness of the beach is the most important characteristic, while recreational offer is the least. Although the prioritization of characteristics is similar between seasons, differences among groups of characteristics are identified, and also in the user’s profile and their preferences. Also, some opinions of users indicate that the characteristics evaluated as most important are perceived as the most problematic aspects. The differences found between summer and autumn could help the beach managers in the Canary Islands to adapt some recreational preferences of minority groups.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This is a contribution of CSO2010-18150, CSO2013-43256-R and CSO2016-79673-R projects of the Spanish National Plan for R+D+i (innovation), co-financed with ERDF funds. It has been developed through the program of support for research of the Canary Islands Government, also co-financed with ERDF funds. The first author was supported by a Postdoctoral fellow from the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria - The second author was supported by a Beatriu de Pinós grant (2011 BP_B 0007) from the Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris and a Ramón y Cajal contract (RYC-2013-13392) from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España).

References

  1. Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol Soc 9(1):18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Areizaga J, Sano M, Medina R, Juanes J (2012) Improving public engagement in ICZM: a practical approach. J Environ Manag 109:123–135. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ariza E, Sardá R, Jiménez JA, Mora J, Ávila C (2008) Beyond performance assessment measurements for beach management: application to Spanish Mediterranean beaches. Coast Manag 36(1):47–66. doi:10.1080/08920750701682023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ariza E, Jiménez JA, Sarda R, Villares M, Pinto J, Fraguell R, Roca E, Martí C, Valdermoro H, Ballester R, Fluvia M (2010) Proposal for an integral quality index for urban and urbanized beaches. Environ Manag 45(5):998–1013. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9472-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ariza E, Ballester R, Rigall-I-Torrent R, Saló A, Roca E, Villares M, Jiménez A, Sardá R (2012) On the relationship between quality, users’ perception and economic valuation in NW Mediterranean beaches. Ocean Coast Manag 63:55–66. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botero C, Anfuso G, Williams AT, Zielinski S, Da Silva CP, Cervantes O, Silva L, Cabrera JA (2013a) Reasons for beach choice: European and Caribbean perspectives. J Coast Res 65(sp1):880–885. doi:10.2112/SI65-149.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botero C, Anfuso G, Williams AT, Palacios A (2013b) Perception of coastal scenery along the Caribbean littoral of Colombia. J Coast Res 65(sp2):1733–1738. doi:10.2112/SI65-293.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breton F, Clapés J, Marquès A, Priestley GK (1996) The recreational use of beaches and consequences for the development of new trends in management: the case of the beaches of the metropolitan region of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Ocean Coast Manag 32(3):153–180. doi:10.1016/S0964-5691(96)00032-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curtin R, Prellezo R (2010) Understanding marine ecosystem based management: a literature review. Mar Policy 34(5):821–830. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2010.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danilova NA (1974) A recreational evaluation of the climate of the Black Sea Coast. Meteorological translations. Atmospheric environment service, Canada, Department of the Environment, Toronto, 25, 17–31Google Scholar
  11. De Freitas CR, Scott D, McBoyle G (2008) A second generation climate index for tourism (CIT): specification and verification. Int J Biometeorol 52(5):399–407. doi:10.1007/s00484-007-0134-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Defeo O, Mclachlan A, Schoeman DS, Schlacher TA, Dugan J, Jones A, Lastra M, Scapini F (2009) Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81(1):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernández-Palacios JM, Vera A, Brito A (2001) Los ecosistemas. In: Fernández-Palacios JM, Martín J (eds) Naturaleza de las Islas Canarias. Ecología y Conservación, Editorial Turquesa, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, pp 157–166Google Scholar
  14. Folke C, Pritchard F, Berkes J, Colding L, Svedin U (2007) The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecol Soc 12(1):30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galloway G (2002) Psychographic segmentation of park visitor markets: evidence for the utility of sensation seeking. Tour Manag 23:581–596. doi:10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00025-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garnåsjordet PA, Aslaksen I, Giampietro M, Funtowicz S, Ericson T (2012) Sustainable development indicators: from statistics to policy. Environ Pol Gov 22(5):322–336. doi:10.1002/eet.1597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guerra TR, Pérez GT (2008) Canarias: entre el desarrollo turístico y la protección al medio. Études Caribéennes. Le tourisme dans les îles et littoraux tropicaux et subtropicaux, vols 9–10Google Scholar
  18. Hernández-Sampieri R, Fernández-Collado C, Baptista-Lucio P (2010) Metodología de la investigación. Editorial Mc Graw Hill, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  19. Instituto Canario De Estadística (ISTAC) (2014) Tourists who have visited the Canary Islands as place of residence. http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/istac/jaxi-istac/tabla.do?uripx=urn:uuid:ebe0aec5-0ab9-4f09-a13a 609b742e1560&uripub=urn:uuid:6b42b90e-b71f-41a5-b2e6-363e854bfdc9. Accessed 16 Jun 2014
  20. Janssen MA, Anderies JM, Ostrom E (2007) Robustness of social-ecological systems to spatial and temporal variability. Soc Nat Resour 20(4):307–322. doi:10.1080/08941920601161320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones A, Phillips M (2011) Disappearing destinations: climate change and future challenges for coastal tourism. CABI, Wallingford/OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lozoya JP, Sardá R, Jiménez JA (2014) Users expectations and the need for differential beach management frameworks along the costa Brava: urban vs. natural protected beaches. Land Use Policy 38:397–414. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martín JF (2001) Geografía de Canarias: Sociedad y Medio Natural. Cabildo de Gran Canaria. Las Palmas de Gran CanariaGoogle Scholar
  24. Marin V, Palmisani F, Ivaldi R, Dursi R, Fabiano M (2009) Users’ perception analysis for sustainable beach management in Italy. Ocean Coast Manag 52(5):268–277. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mayumi K, Giampietro M (2006) The epistemological challenge of self-modifying systems: governance and sustainability in the post-normal science era. Ecol Econ 57(3):382–399. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Micallef A, Williams AT (2003) Application of a novel bathing area evaluation (BARE) system–a pilot study of selected areas of the Dalmatian coast. Report commis sioned by the World Wildlife Fund, MedPO, Rome, ITGoogle Scholar
  27. Morgan R (1999) Preferences and priorities of recreational beach users in Wales, UK. J Coast Res 15(3):653–667Google Scholar
  28. Morgan R, Gatell E, Junyent R, Micallef A, Özhan E, Williams AT (2000) An improved user-based beach climate index. J Coast Conserv 6(1):41–50. doi:10.1007/BF02730466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Hoffman A, Giovannini E (2005) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Paper. OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson C, Morgan R, Williams AT, Wood J (2000) Beach awards and management. Ocean Coast Manag 43(1):87–98. doi:10.1016/S0964-5691(99)00068-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ostrom E, Cox M (2010) Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environ Conserv 37(04):451–463. doi:10.1017/S0376892910000834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ostrom E, Janssen MA, Anderies JM (2007) Going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(39):15176–15178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peña-Alonso C (2015) Diseño y aplicación de indicadores de vulnerabilidad y calidad para playas y dunas de Canarias: una propuesta metodológica. Ph.D. thesis. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, UnpublishedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pendleton L, Martin N, Websner DG (2001) Public perceptions of environmental quality: a survey study of beach use and perceptions in Los Angeles County. Mar Pollut Bull 42(11):1155–1160. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00131-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roca E, Villares M (2008) Public perceptions for evaluating beach quality in urban and semi-natural environments. Ocean Coast Manag 51(4):314–329. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2007.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roca E, Villares M, Ortego MI (2009) Assessing public perceptions on beach quality according to beach users’ profile: a case study in the costa Brava (Spain). Tour Manag 30(4):598–607. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rutty M, Scott D (2015) Bioclimatic comfort and the thermal perceptions and preferences of beach tourists. Int J Biometeorol 59(1):37–45. doi:10.1007/s00484-014-0820-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tunstall SM, Penning-Rowsell EC (1998) The English Beach: experiences and values. Geogr J 164(3):319–332. doi:10.2307/3060620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vaz B, Williams AT, Silva CPD, Phillips M (2009) The importance of user’s perception for beach management. J Coast Res 56:1164–1168Google Scholar
  40. Williams AT, Gardner W, Jones TC, Morgan R, Ozhan E (1993) A psychological approach to attitudes and perceptions of beach users: implications for coastal zone management. In The first international conference on the Mediterranean coastal environment, MEDCOAST (Vol. 93)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolina Peña-Alonso
    • 1
  • Eduard Ariza
    • 2
  • Luis Hernández-Calvento
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Oceanografía y Cambio GlobalUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas PalmasSpain
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain

Personalised recommendations