Attribute Reduction in a Dispersed Decision-Making System with Negotiations

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 716)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to apply rough set attribute reduction in a dispersed decision-making system. The system that was used was proposed by the author in a previous work. In this system, a global decision is taken based on the classifications that are by the base classifiers. In the process of decision-making, elements of conflict analysis and negotiations have been applied. Reduction of the set of conditional attributes in local decision tables was used in the paper. The aim of the study was to analyze and compare the results that were obtained after the reduction with the results that were obtained for the full set of attributes.

Keywords

Decision-making system Dispersed knowledge Conflict analysis Attribute reduction 

References

  1. 1.
    Bregar, A.: Towards a framework for the measurement and reduction of user-perceivable complexity of group decision-making methods. IJDSST 6(2), 21–45 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Pedrycz, W.: A method based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 230(3), 624–633 (2013)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Demri, S., Orlowska, E.: Incomplete Information: Structure, Inference. Complexity. Monographs in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gatnar, E.: Multiple-model approach to classification and regression. PWN, Warsaw (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuncheva, L.I.: Combining Pattern Classifiers Methods and Algorithms. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11, 341–356 (1982)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pawlak, Z.: On conflicts. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 21(2), 127–134 (1984)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pawlak, Z.: An inquiry into anatomy of conflicts. Inf. Sci. 109(1–4), 65–78 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Polikar, R.: Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits Syst. Mag. 6(3), 21–45 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Przybyła-Kasperek, M., Wakulicz-Deja, A.: Application of reduction of the set of conditional attributes in the process of global decision-making. Fundam. Inform. 122(4), 327–355 (2013)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Przybyła-Kasperek, M., Wakulicz-Deja, A.: A dispersed decision-making system - the use of negotiations during the dynamic generation of a system’s structure. Inf. Sci. 288, 194–219 (2014)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Przybyła-Kasperek, M., Wakulicz-Deja, A.: Global decision-making system with dynamically generated clusters. Inf. Sci. 270, 172–191 (2014)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Przybyła-Kasperek, M.: Decision making system with dynamically generated disjoint clusters. Stud. Informatica 34(2A), 275–294 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Przybyła-Kasperek, M.: Global decisions taking process, including the stage of negotiation, on the basis of dispersed medical data. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B., Kostrzewa, D. (eds.) BDAS 2014. CCIS, vol. 424, pp. 290–299. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06932-6_28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Przybyla-Kasperek, M., Wakulicz-Deja, A.: Global decision-making in multi-agent decision-making system with dynamically generated disjoint clusters. Appl. Soft Comput. 40, 603–615 (2016)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schneeweiss, C.: Distributed decision making-a unified approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 150(2), 237–252 (2003)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Skowron, A.: Rough Set Exploration System. http://logic.mimuw.edu.pl/~rses/. Accessed 03 Nov 2016
  18. 18.
    Skowron, A.: Rough sets and vague concepts. Fundam. Inform. 64(1–4), 417–431 (2005)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Skowron, A., Wang, H., Wojna, A., Bazan, J.G.: Multimodal Classification: Case Studies, Transactions on Rough Sets V. LNCS, vol. 4100, pp. 224–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Susmaga, R., Slowinski, R.: Generation of rough sets reducts and constructs based on inter-class and intra-class information. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 274, 124–142 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wakulicz-Deja, A., Przybyła-Kasperek, M.: Multi-agent decision system & comparision of methods. Stud. Informatica 31(2A), 173–188 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of SilesiaSosnowiecPoland

Personalised recommendations