Sociologically Reframing Le Corbusier: Settler Colonialism, Modern Architecture and UNESCO

  • Eric M. NayEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 3)


In my current research I focus specifically on how Le Corbusier, the figure, was forged over the past century through architectural pedagogy as an institution and how Le Corbusier, almost inconceivably, still dominates the central narrative in how modern architecture is conceived, taught and reproduced. It is still Le Corbusier who shapes architectural discourse, structures historiography and is mimicked through performance as a performative norm. Le Corbusier’s figuration has also resulted in postmodern global practices that continue to devalue all non-compliant ideologies and pre-modern or anti-modern epistemologies - all the while quashing any alternative ways of being, or building, in the world that vary form the late modernist norm - specifically in relationship to ways of seeing and being in the Land. By subjecting this system of figuration (specifically within architectural education) to a number of useful, but unfamiliar lenses borrowed from the social sciences, I am interrogate how the scholarship of architecture, the framing of architectural heritage and the spatial realities of the built environment have eschewed any and all non-conforming frameworks through the canonization of Le Corbusier as an embodied institution. I draw specifically in my work from scholars working in critical race theory and settler colonialism who use architectural space and narratives as a methodology. The driving thesis behind my work questions how the pedagogy of architecture is able to remain geographically and ideologically grounded by this one dominant figure, Le Corbusier, and what types of knowledge production must be introduced to remedy this debilitating condition.


Le Corbusier UNESCO Architecture World Heritage Settler-colonialism Indigeneity 


  1. 1.
    The architectural work of Le Corbusier, an outstanding contribution to the modern movement (2016). UNESCO, Paris, France. Accessed 15 Jan 2017
  2. 2.
    Hall M (2011) Towards World heritage: international origins of the preservation movement, 1870–1930. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Said E (1979) Orientalism. Vintage, New York, p 96Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg DT (2006) Deva-stating disasters: race in the shadow(s) of New Orleans. Du Bois Rev.: Soc. Sci. Res. Race 3(01):83–95. doi: 10.1017/s1742058x06060061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Razack S (2014) It happened more than once: freezing deaths in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Women Law 26(1):51–80. doi: 10.3138/cjwl.26.1.51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roediger DR (1991) The wages of whiteness: race and the making of the American working class. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gramsci A, Boothman D (1995) Antonio gramsci further selections from the prison notebooks. Lawrence and Wishart, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Latour B, Porter C (1993) We have never been modern. Harvard, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hitchcock H, Johnson P (1966) The international style. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Butler J (1990) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davies B (2006) Subjectification: the relevance of Butler’s analysis for education. Br. J. Sociol. Educ. 27(4):425–438. doi: 10.1080/01425690600802907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kovach M (2009) Indigenous methodologies: characteristics, conversations and contexts. University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Land C (2015) Decolonizing solidarity: dilemmas and directions for supporters of indigenous struggles. Zed, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith LT (1998) Decolonising methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Zed, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boyer EL, Mitgang LD (1996) Building community: a new future for architecture education and practice. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilson M (2012) Negro building: Black Americans in the world of fairs and museums. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nay E (2014) Sustainable architecture is localized architecture. Altern. J., Waterloo. Accessed 15 Jan 2017
  19. 19.
    Behse A, Grohnert S (2015) Ever the land. a people, their place. their building (Motion Picture). Monsoon Pictures International, New ZealandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Justice Education, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Ontario College of Art and DesignUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations