Advertisement

Context and Natural Language in Formal Concept Analysis

  • Tim Wray
  • Peter Eklund
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10257)

Abstract

CollectionWeb is a framework that uses Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) to link contextually related objects within museum collections. These connections are used to drive a number of user interactions that are intended to promote exploration and discovery. The idea is based on museological perspectives that emphasise the importance of the human, social and cultural contexts that are associated with objects. This paper presents an application of these museological concepts as related to the principles of Formal Concept Analysis along with a description of how the CollectionWeb framework generates narratives based on conceptual pathways. The framework has been applied to a number of user facing applications and provides insights on how FCA and natural language pipelines can be used to provide contextual, linked navigation within museum collections.

Keywords

Formal Concept Analysis Museums Context 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, G.: Reinventing the Museum: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift. Rowman Altamira, Lanham (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carpineto, C., Romano, G.: Concept Data Analysis: Theory and Applications. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eklund, P., Goodall, P., Wray, T.: Cluster-based navigation for a virtual museum. In: 9th RIAO Conference - Adaptivity, Personalization and Fusion - of Heterogeneous Information. ACM Press, Paris, April 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finkel, J., Grenager, T., Manning, C.: Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2005), pp. 363–370 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hooper-Greenhill, E.: Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge. Routledge, Abingdon (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pearce, S.: Thinking about things. In: Pearce, S. (ed.) Interpreting Objects and Collections. Routledge, London (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ross, M.: Interpreting the new museology. Mus. Soc. 2(2), 84–103 (2004)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roth, D., Zelenko, D.: Part of speech tagging using a network of linear separators. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1136–1142 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saquer, J., Deogun, J.: Concept aproximations based on rough sets and similarity measures. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 11, 655–674 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schweibenz, W.: The “Virtual Museum”: new perspectives for museums to present objects and information using the internet as a knowledge base and communication system. In: Zimmermann, H., Schramm, B. (eds.) Knowledge Management und Kommunikationssysteme, Workflow Management, Multimedia, Knowledge Transfer. Proceedings des 6. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 1998), pp. 3–7 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skov, M.: The reinvented museum: exploring information seeking behaviour in a digital museum context. Ph.D. thesis, Royal School of Library and Information Science (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Styliani, S., Fotis, L., Kostas, K., Petros, P.: Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration. J. Cult. Herit. 10(4), 520–528 (2009). http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1296207409000880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wille, R.: Formal concept analysis as mathematical theory of concepts and concept hierarchies. In: Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.) Formal Concept Analysis. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3626, pp. 1–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi: 10.1007/11528784_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wille, R., Ganter, B.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Berlin (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wray, T., Eklund, P.: Concepts and collections: a case study using objects from the brooklyn museum. In: Predoiu, L., Hennicke, S., Nurnberger, A., Mitschick, A., Ross, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives, pp. 109–120 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wray, T., Eklund, P., Kautz, K.: Pathways through information landscapes: alternative design criteria for digital art collections. In: ICIS 2013 Proceedings, Milan, Italy (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IT University of CopenhagenCopenhagen S.Denmark

Personalised recommendations