The Walkability Planning Support System: An Evidence-Based Tool to Design Healthy Communities
A major challenge for all cities is to reconcile growth with cultural, social and environmental considerations, along with connecting urban design with opportunities for health and wellbeing. Planning Support Systems (PSSs) can facilitate future planning and foster collaboration between researchers and urban planners in promoting healthy built environments. The Walkability PSS was developed specially for that purpose. This chapter presents an evaluation of the Walkability PSS, a PSS for building planning scenarios and assessing their impacts on walking behaviours. The evaluation was conducted in collaboration with a group of local urban planners. The study results show that the Walkability PSS could support planners in several situations including testing and comparing planning scenarios for greenfield and brownfield areas, conducting consultation and/or workshops with various stakeholders and making decisions about the provision of new infrastructure.
KeywordsPlanning Support System Walkability Healthy cities Participatory planning Co-design
- Arciniegas, G., Geertman, S., & de Kroes, J. (2013). Using MapTable® to learn about sustainable urban development. In S. Geertman, F. Toppen, & J. Stillwell (Eds.). Planning support systems for sustainable urban development Heodelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 167–186. Google Scholar
- Christian, H., Bull, F., Middleton, N., Knuiman, M., Divitini, M., Hooper, P., Amarasinghe, A., & Giles-Corti, B. (2011). How important is the land use mix measure in understanding walking behaviour? Results from the RESIDE study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(55), doi:10.1186/1479-5868-1188-1155.
- Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Chapman, J. E., Saelens, B. E., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health: Associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (2004). Planning support systems: An inventory of current practice. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28(4), 291–310.Google Scholar
- State Government Victoria (2014). Plan Melbourne. Metropolitan planning strategy 2014. Melbourne: State Government Victoria.Google Scholar
- Ulmer, J. M., Chapman, J. E., Kershaw, S. E., Campbell, M., & Frank, L. D. (2015). Application of an evidence-based tool to evaluate health impacts of changes to the built environment. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 106(1 Suppl 1), eS26–34, doi:10.17269/cjph.106.4338.Google Scholar
- Wong, F., Stevens, D., O’Connor-Duffany, K., Siegel, K., & Gao, Y. (2011). Community health environment scan survey (CHESS): A novel tool that captures the impact of the built environment on lifestyle factors. Global Health Action, 4, doi:10.3402/gha.v4i0.5276.
- World Health Organization. (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion: First international conference on health promotion, Ottawa, 21 November 1986 (International Conference on Health Promotion). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. (2010). Hidden cities: Unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar