Advertisement

Designing with Data for Urban Resilience

  • Nano LangenheimEmail author
  • Marcus White
  • Jack Barton
  • Serryn Eagleson
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

The growing availability of spatial data heralds extensive opportunities for urban planning and design. Planning for resilience and enabling positive design outcomes requires transliterate methods of working with data and instigation of systems which can be quickly and iteratively adapted to complex multiple criteria and across multiple geographies. As such, planning support systems are critical to assist decision-makers navigate increasingly large repositories of (big) data, and develop evidence-based, replicable methodologies and easily communicated scenarios that can inform both the planning process and increase community buy-in for behavioural augmentation. To do this, we need to bring together data and information sets in a dynamic way, from disparate and vastly divergent disciplines and sources. This chapter will present a series of exemplars for environmental analysis, predictive modelling and planning support systems, particularly, the Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network (AURIN): a federated data platform supporting urban research, design and policy formulation.

Keywords

Interdisciplinary Agent based pedestrian modeling Community consultation Data access 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The PedCatch tool has been built on prior work funded by the Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network (AURIN) and The Australian National Data Service (ANDS). The current project is a University of Melbourne Disability Research Initiative funded by Melbourne Networked Society Institute (MNSI) and Melbourne Social Equity Institute (MSEI).

The Elwood project was developed through PhD candidature in the Department of Architecture, Monash University and forms part of the wider research into Elwood and its catchment undertaken by the Co-operative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities’ D5.1 program.

References

  1. Andersen, J., & Landex, A. (2009). GIS-based approaches to catchment area analyses of mass transit. In ESRI Users Group Conference (pp. 1–13). ESRI.Google Scholar
  2. Badland, H., White, M., MacAulay, G., Eagleson, S., Mavoa, S., Pettit, C., et al. (2013). Using simple agent-based modeling to inform and enhance neighborhood walkability. International Journal of Health Geographics, 12(1), 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batty, M. (2016). Urban resilience: How cities need to adapt to unanticipated and sudden change. In E. Pate-Cornell, W. B. Rouse, C. M. Vest (Eds.), Perspectives on complex global challenges: Education, energy, healthcare, security and resilience (pp. 169–171). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, A., Garrard, J., & Swinburn, B. (2005). Active transport to work in Australia: Is it all downhill from here? Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health/Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health, 18(1), 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BOM. (2013). 2013 shaping up to be one of Australia’s hottest years on record. Bureau of Meteorology. Accessed July 11, 2016 from http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/updates/articles/a003-2013-temperature.shtml#july-update
  6. Boon, H. J. (2014). Disaster resilience in a flood-impacted rural Australian town. Natural Hazards, 71(1), 683–701.Google Scholar
  7. Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Derobertis, M., Eells, J., Kott, J., & Lee, R. W. (2014). Changing the paradigm of traffic impact studies: How typical traffic studies inhibit sustainable transportation. ITE Journal, 84(5), 30.Google Scholar
  9. Dobbs, C., Kendal, D., & Nitschke, C. (2013). The effects of land tenure and land use on the urban forest structure and composition of Melbourne. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12, 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dobbs, C., Kendal, D., & Nitschke, C. R. (2014). Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecological Indicators, 43, 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eamus, D. (2006). Ecohydrology: Vegetation function, water and resource management. Melbourne : CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Fletcher, T., Andrieu, H., & Hamel, P. (2013). Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the art. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geertman, S., Toppen, F., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.). (2013). Planning support systems for sustainable urban development. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: Imprint: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Giles-Corti, B., Wood, G., Pikora, T., Learnihan, V., Bulsara, M., Van Niel, K., et al. (2011). School site and the potential to walk to school: The impact of street connectivity and traffic exposure in school neighborhoods. Health & place, 17(2), 545–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gleeson, B. (2008). Critical commentary. Waking from the dream: An Australian perspective on urban resilience. Urban Studies, 45(13), 2653–2668.Google Scholar
  16. Gray, M. (1993). Flora of Melbourne. Hyland House.Google Scholar
  17. Holliday, I., & Watton, G. (1980). A gardener’s guide to eucalypts (pp. 94–95). Rigby Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Jarrett, J., Woodcock, J., Griffiths, U. K., Chalabi, Z., Edwards, P., Roberts, I., et al. (2012). Effect of increasing active travel in urban England and Wales on costs to the National Health Service. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2198–2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirkpatrick, J., Davison, A., & Daniels, G. (2012). Resident attitudes towards trees influence the planting and removal of different types of trees in eastern Australian cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(2), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kitchin, R., & Lauriault, T. P. (2015). Small data in the era of big data. GeoJournal, 80(4), 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leichenko, R. (2011). Climate change and urban resilience. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 164–168.Google Scholar
  23. McCormack, G. R., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2008). The relationship between destination proximity, destination mix and physical activity behaviors. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 33–40.Google Scholar
  24. McDonald, N. C., Steiner, R. L., Palmer, W. M., Bullock, A. N., Sisiopiku, V. P., & Lytle, B. F. (2016). Costs of school transportation: quantifying the fiscal impacts of encouraging walking and bicycling for school travel. Transportation, 43(1), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Melbourne Water. (2012). Planning for sea level rise—Guidelines. Melbourne: Melbourne Water.Google Scholar
  26. Melbourne Water. (2013). Stormwater strategy: A Melbourne Water strategy for managing rural and urban runoff. Melbourne: Melbourne Water.Google Scholar
  27. Mitchell, P. J., O’Grady, A. P., Hayes, K. R., & Pinkard, E. A. (2014). Exposure of trees to drought-induced die-off is defined by a common climatic threshold across different vegetation types. Ecology and Evolution, 4(7), 1088–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. NACTO. (2013). Urban street design guide. Washington, DC : Island Press/Center for Resource Economics : Imprint: Island Press.Google Scholar
  29. Newman, P., Beatley, T., & Boyer, H. (2009). Resilient cities: Responding to peak oil and climate change. Island Press.Google Scholar
  30. Olds, T. S., Tomkinson, G. R., Ferrar, K. E., & Maher, C. A. (2010). Trends in the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity in Australia between 1985 and 2008. International Journal of Obesity, 34(1), 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Owen, N., Cerin, E., Leslie, E., Coffee, N., Frank, L. D., Bauman, A. E., et al. (2007). Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(5), 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Owen, N., Humpel, N., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2004). Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(1), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parmehr, E. G., Amati, M., Taylor, E. J., & Livesley, S. J. (2016). Original article: Estimation of urban tree canopy cover using random point sampling and remote sensing methods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 20, 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pettit, C.J., Barton, J., Goldie, X., Sinnott, R., Stimson, R., & Kvan, T. (2015). The Australian urban intelligence network supporting smart cities. In S. Geertman, J. Stillwell, J. Ferreira, J. Goodspeed (Eds.), Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities (pp. 243–259). Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Pikora, T., Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. (2001). How far will people walk to facilities in their local neighbourhoods? In Australia: Walking the 21st Century, International Conference, 2001, Perth, Western Australia (Vol. 3).Google Scholar
  36. Presland, G. (2008). The place for a village: How nature has shaped the city of Melbourne. Melbourne: Museum Victoria Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Rockefeller Foundation. (2016). The role of foundations: Rockefeller Foundation. Public Health Reviews, 37(1), 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogers, B., Bertram, N., Gunn, A., Löwe, R., Murphy, C., Pasman, R., et al. (2016). An interdisciplinary approach to identify adaptation strategies that enhance flood resilience and urban liveability. In IWA World Water Congress & Exhibition.Google Scholar
  39. Sander, H., Ghosh, D., van Riper, D., & Manson, S. M. (2010). How do you measure distance in spatial models? An example using open-space valuation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(5), 874–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sarkar, C., Webster, C., Pryor, M., Tang, D., Melbourne, S., Zhang X., & Jianzheng, L. (2015). Exploring associations between urban green, street design and walking: Results from the greater London boroughs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 143, 112–125.Google Scholar
  41. Schlossberg, M., Greene, J., Phillips, P. P., Johnson, B., & Parker, B. (2006). School trips: effects of urban form and distance on travel mode. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(3), 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shears, I. (2009). City of Melbourne: An urban greening perspective. In Proceedings of Conference on The 10th National Street Tree Symposium, TreeNet, Adelaide, Australia (pp. 55–61).Google Scholar
  43. Sinnott, R. O. C., Bayliss, A., Bromage, G., Galang, G., Grazioli, P., Greenwood, G., et al. (2014). The Australia urban research gateway. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 27(2), 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steiniger, S., & Hunter, A. J. (2013). A user manual to perform home range analysis and estimation with OpenJUMP HoRAE.Google Scholar
  45. Threlfall, C. G., Williams, N. S., Hahs, A. K., & Livesley, S. J. (2016). Approaches to urban vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ulmer, J. M., Wolf, K. L., Backman, D. R., Tretheway, R. L., Blain, C. J. A., O’Neil-Dunne, J. P. M., & Frank L. D. (2016). Multiple health benefits of urban tree canopy: The mounting evidence for a green prescription. Health & Place, 42, 54–62.Google Scholar
  47. United Nations. (2006). UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Department of Public Information. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
  48. Van der Ploeg, H. P., Merom, D., Corpuz, G., & Bauman, A. E. (2008). Trends in Australian children traveling to school 1971–2003: Burning petrol or carbohydrates? Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White, M. (2007). The plan is an inadequate tool for planning: Enhancing the urban design process through the use of 3D+ digital tools directed towards sustainability. In Forum on the Application of Sustainable Theory to Urban Development Practice Proceedings.Google Scholar
  50. White, M., & Kimm, G. (2016). PedCatch. http://www.pedcatch.com
  51. White, M., & Langenheim, N. (2014). Impact assessment of street trees in the City of Melbourne using temporal high polygon 3D canopy modelling. In 7th International Urban Design Conference Designing Productive Cities. Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  52. Wilkinson, M. D., et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3.Google Scholar
  53. Wilson, W. H. (1993). The city beautiful movement. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Yang, Y., & Diez-Roux, A. V. (2013). Using an agent-based model to simulate children’s active travel to school. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10(10.1186), 1479–5868.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nano Langenheim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marcus White
    • 2
  • Jack Barton
    • 2
  • Serryn Eagleson
    • 2
  1. 1.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations